| Literature DB >> 31366359 |
Chiyu Wang1, Wen Zhang1, Yuying Wang1, Heng Wan1, Yi Chen1, Fangzhen Xia1, Kun Zhang1, Ningjian Wang2, Yingli Lu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Associations between sex hormones and vascular remodeling have been extensively studied, but the results vary widely among different races and sex. We aimed to investigate whether total testosterone (TT), estrogen (E2), and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) associate with macrovascular complications and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) among community-dwelling patients with diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: Dehydroepiandrosterone; Diabetic kidney disease; Diabetic macrovascular complications; Estradiol; Testosterone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31366359 PMCID: PMC6668151 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-019-0901-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Fig. 1Flowchart of the inclusion and exclusion of participants
General characteristics among participants with and without CVD
| Men | Postmenopausal women | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without CVD | With CVD | Without CVD | With CVD | |
| N | 1375 | 772 | 1455 | 954 |
| Demographic parameter | ||||
| Age, years | 65.99 ± 8.77 | 70.19 ± 7.94* | 66.24 ± 7.43 | 69.78 ± 7.61* |
| Duration of diabetes, years | 9.6 ± 7.68 | 11.2 ± 8.05* | 9.22 ± 7.64 | 11.66 ± 8.52* |
| HbA1c, % | 7.56 ± 1.41 | 7.62 ± 1.41 | 7.38 ± 1.37 | 7.45 ± 1.3 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.84 ± 3.41 | 25.28 ± 3.14* | 24.61 ± 3.82 | 25.28 ± 3.72* |
| Smoking, % | 39.7 | 29.3* | 2.6 | 2.2 |
| Hypertension, % | 73.5 | 86.3* | 75.5 | 87.2* |
| Dyslipidemia, % | 59.9 | 70.5* | 57.6 | 65.8* |
| Sex hormone level | ||||
| TT, nmol/L | 15 ± 5.86 | 14.5 ± 6 | 0.59 ± 0.43 | 0.65 ± 0.64* |
| E2, pmol/L | 114 (89.62, 138.9) | 121.15 (95.47, 144.4)* | 29.38 (9.18, 50.15) | 31.67 (9.18, 53.21) |
| DHEA, pg/mL | 202.39 ± 103.71 | 167.88 ± 89.1* | 132.98 ± 67.91 | 124.76 ± 67.77* |
| FSH, IU/L | 12 ± 9.94 | 13.53 ± 12.42* | 55.28 ± 23.02 | 55.84 ± 24.35 |
| LH, IU/L | 8.27 ± 5.03 | 8.99 ± 6.43* | 26.05 ± 11.42 | 26.38 ± 12.62 |
| Carotid artery ultrasound | ||||
| CCA plaque, % | 63.5 | 77.3* | 42 | 52.7* |
| CCA diameter, mm | 7.77 ± 0.88 | 7.92 ± 0.88* | 7.48 ± 0.79 | 7.68 ± 0.78* |
| cIMT, mm | 0.87 ± 0.15 | 0.89 ± 0.15* | 0.81 ± 0.13 | 0.84 ± 0.14* |
Normally distributed variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, non-normal variables are expressed as median (P25, P75) and categorical variables are expressed as percentage (%). The Student’s t test was used to compare the continuous variables of the normal distribution, the Mann–Whitney U test was used for the comparison of the non-normal distribution continuous variables, and the Pearson χ2 test was used for the comparison between the categorical variables
* P < 0.05, compared with those without CVD
Fig. 2Association of sex hormone level quartiles with diabetic macrovascular complications in men and postmenopausal women. Linear (CCA diameter) and binary logistic (CVD and CCA plaque) regression analyses were used
General characteristics among participants with and without DKD
| Men | Postmenopausal women | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without DKD | With DKD | Without DKD | With DKD | |
| N | 1528 | 592 | 1705 | 678 |
| Demographic parameter | ||||
| Age, years | 66.75 ± 8.26 | 69.47 ± 9.34* | 66.94 ± 7.23 | 69.61 ± 8.54* |
| Duration of diabetes, years | 9.36 ± 7.41 | 12.35 ± 8.47* | 9.51 ± 7.88 | 11.94 ± 8.37* |
| HbA1c, % | 7.41 ± 1.27 | 8.02 ± 1.6* | 7.29 ± 1.26 | 7.71 ± 1.46* |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.77 ± 3.24 | 25.54 ± 3.41* | 24.54 ± 3.71 | 25.75 ± 3.89* |
| Smoking, % | 34.9 | 38.7 | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| Hypertension, % | 73.7 | 89.9* | 76.1 | 90.7* |
| Dyslipidemia, % | 61.5 | 68.4* | 59 | 64.5* |
| Sex hormone levels | ||||
| TT, nmol/L | 15.13 ± 5.89 | 13.99 ± 5.89* | 0.61 ± 0.55 | 0.63 ± 0.46 |
| E2, pmol/L | 122.3 (173.9, 243.63) | 110.98 (172.65, 242.88) | 79.35 (117.7, 163.85) | 77.78 (121.6, 171.4)* |
| DHEA, pg/mL | 190.73 ± 96.65 | 192.03 ± 109.8 | 128.5 ± 66.62 | 131.72 ± 71.56 |
| FSH, IU/L | 11.77 ± 9.33 | 14.55 ± 13.97* | 54.35 ± 22.12 | 58.39 ± 26.78* |
| LH, IU/L | 7.87 ± 4.4 | 10.24 ± 7.6* | 25.49 ± 10.63 | 27.99 ± 14.53* |
| Renal function index | ||||
| lnACR | 2.19 ± 0.63 | 4.46 ± 1.26* | 2.32 ± 0.64 | 4.27 ± 1.12* |
| High ACR, % | 0 | 92.6* | 0 | 91.8* |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 93.51 ± 12.65 | 81.84 ± 23.75* | 94.71 ± 12.15 | 84.98 ± 22.72* |
Normally distributed variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, non-normal variables are expressed as median (P25, P75) and categorical variables are expressed as percentage (%). The Student’s t test was used to compare the continuous variables of the normal distribution, the Mann–Whitney U test was used for the comparison of the non-normal distribution continuous variables, and the Pearson χ2 test was used for the comparison between the categorical variables
* P < 0.05, compared with those without DKD
Fig. 3Association of sex hormone level quartiles with DKD in men and postmenopausal women. Linear (lnACR) and binary logistic (HighACR and DKD) regression analyses were used