Literature DB >> 15611490

Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease.

Andrew D Rule1, Timothy S Larson, Erik J Bergstralh, Jeff M Slezak, Steven J Jacobsen, Fernando G Cosio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Kidney Foundation has advocated the use of the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from serum creatinine measurements in clinical laboratories. However, healthy persons were not included in the development of the MDRD equation.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of the MDRD equation in patients with chronic kidney disease compared with healthy persons and to develop a new equation that uses both patients with chronic kidney disease and healthy persons.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: The Mayo Clinic, a tertiary-care medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients (n = 320) who had an iothalamate clearance test specifically for chronic kidney disease evaluation and consecutive healthy persons (n = 580) who had an iothalamate clearance test specifically for kidney donor evaluation. MEASUREMENTS: Serum creatinine levels, GFR, demographic characteristics, and clinical characteristics were abstracted from the medical record.
RESULTS: The MDRD equation underestimated GFR by 6.2% in patients with chronic kidney disease and by 29% in healthy persons. Re-estimated coefficients for serum creatinine and sex were similar to the original MDRD equation in the chronic kidney disease series but not in the healthy series. At the same serum creatinine level, age, and sex, GFR was on average 26% higher in healthy persons than in patients with chronic kidney disease (P < 0.001). A quadratic GFR equation was developed to estimate logarithmic GFR from the following covariates: 1/SCr, 1/SCr2, age, and sex (where SCr = serum creatinine). LIMITATIONS: The new equation was not developed in a general population sample. Elderly and African-American persons were underrepresented.
CONCLUSION: The MDRD equation systematically underestimates GFR in healthy persons. A new equation developed with patients who have chronic kidney disease and healthy persons may be a step toward accurately estimating GFR when the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease is unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15611490     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  309 in total

1.  Kidney function and risk triage in adults: threshold values and hierarchical importance.

Authors:  Robert N Foley; Changchun Wang; Jon J Snyder; Andrew D Rule; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Heritability of measures of kidney disease among Zuni Indians: the Zuni Kidney Project.

Authors:  Jean W MacCluer; Marina Scavini; Vallabh O Shah; Shelley A Cole; Sandra L Laston; V Saroja Voruganti; Susan S Paine; Alfred J Eaton; Anthony G Comuzzie; Francesca Tentori; Dorothy R Pathak; Arlene Bobelu; Jeanette Bobelu; Donica Ghahate; Mildred Waikaniwa; Philip G Zager
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Measurement of renal function in a kidney donor: a comparison of creatinine-based and volume-based GFRs.

Authors:  Don Kyoung Choi; See Min Choi; Bong Hee Park; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han-Yong Choi; Hwang Gyun Jeon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Performance of the Japanese GFR equation in potential kidney donors.

Authors:  Masaru Horio; Yoshinari Yasuda; Jyunya Kaimori; Naotsugu Ichimaru; Yoshitaka Isaka; Shiro Takahara; Shinichi Nishi; Kazuharu Uchida; Asami Takeda; Ryohei Hattori; Hidehisa Kitada; Kazuhiko Tsuruya; Enyu Imai; Kota Takahashi; Tsuyoshi Watanabe; Seiichi Matsuo
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.801

5.  For estimating creatinine clearance measuring muscle mass gives better results than those based on demographics.

Authors:  Andrew D Rule; Kent R Bailey; Gary L Schwartz; Sundeep Khosla; John C Lieske; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  The costs and benefits of automatic estimated glomerular filtration rate reporting.

Authors:  Julia R den Hartog; Peter P Reese; Borut Cizman; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Predominant effect of kidney disease on mortality in Pima Indians with or without type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Meda E Pavkov; Peter H Bennett; Maurice L Sievers; Jonathan Krakoff; Desmond E Williams; William C Knowler; Robert G Nelson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Prevalence of CKD in the United States: a sensitivity analysis using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2004.

Authors:  Jon J Snyder; Robert N Foley; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 9.  Screening for chronic kidney disease in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  Michelle M Estrella; Derek M Fine
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.620

Review 10.  Early detection of diabetic kidney disease: Present limitations and future perspectives.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Lin; Yi-Cheng Chang; Lee-Ming Chuang
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2016-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.