| Literature DB >> 26631737 |
Alexander Teumer1, Adrienne Tin2, Rossella Sorice3, Mathias Gorski4, Nan Cher Yeo5, Audrey Y Chu6, Man Li2, Yong Li7, Vladan Mijatovic8, Yi-An Ko9, Daniel Taliun10, Alessandro Luciani11, Ming-Huei Chen12, Qiong Yang13, Meredith C Foster14, Matthias Olden15, Linda T Hiraki16, Bamidele O Tayo17, Christian Fuchsberger10, Aida Karina Dieffenbach18, Alan R Shuldiner19, Albert V Smith20, Allison M Zappa21, Antonio Lupo22, Barbara Kollerits23, Belen Ponte24, Bénédicte Stengel25, Bernhard K Krämer26, Bernhard Paulweber27, Braxton D Mitchell19, Caroline Hayward28, Catherine Helmer29, Christa Meisinger30, Christian Gieger31, Christian M Shaffer32, Christian Müller33, Claudia Langenberg34, Daniel Ackermann35, David Siscovick36, Eric Boerwinkle37, Florian Kronenberg23, Georg B Ehret38, Georg Homuth39, Gerard Waeber40, Gerjan Navis41, Giovanni Gambaro42, Giovanni Malerba8, Gudny Eiriksdottir43, Guo Li36, H Erich Wichmann44, Harald Grallert45, Henri Wallaschofski46, Henry Völzke47, Herrmann Brenner48, Holly Kramer17, I Mateo Leach49, Igor Rudan50, Hans L Hillege51, Jacques S Beckmann52, Jean Charles Lambert53, Jian'an Luan34, Jing Hua Zhao34, John Chalmers54, Josef Coresh55, Joshua C Denny32, Katja Butterbach48, Lenore J Launer56, Luigi Ferrucci57, Lyudmyla Kedenko27, Margot Haun23, Marie Metzger25, Mark Woodward58, Matthew J Hoffman5, Matthias Nauck59, Melanie Waldenberger30, Menno Pruijm60, Murielle Bochud61, Myriam Rheinberger62, Niek Verweij49, Nicholas J Wareham34, Nicole Endlich63, Nicole Soranzo64, Ozren Polasek65, Pim van der Harst51, Peter Paul Pramstaller10, Peter Vollenweider40, Philipp S Wild66, Ron T Gansevoort51, Rainer Rettig67, Reiner Biffar68, Robert J Carroll32, Ronit Katz69, Ruth J F Loos70, Shih-Jen Hwang71, Stefan Coassin23, Sven Bergmann72, Sylvia E Rosas73, Sylvia Stracke74, Tamara B Harris56, Tanguy Corre72, Tanja Zeller33, Thomas Illig75, Thor Aspelund20, Toshiko Tanaka57, Uwe Lendeckel76, Uwe Völker77, Vilmundur Gudnason20, Vincent Chouraki53, Wolfgang Koenig78, Zoltan Kutalik79, Jeffrey R O'Connell19, Afshin Parsa19, Iris M Heid80, Andrew D Paterson81, Ian H de Boer69, Olivier Devuyst11, Jozef Lazar82, Karlhans Endlich63, Katalin Susztak9, Johanne Tremblay83, Pavel Hamet83, Howard J Jacob5, Carsten A Böger62, Caroline S Fox84, Cristian Pattaro85, Anna Köttgen86.
Abstract
Elevated concentrations of albumin in the urine, albuminuria, are a hallmark of diabetic kidney disease and are associated with an increased risk for end-stage renal disease and cardiovascular events. To gain insight into the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying albuminuria, we conducted meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies and independent replication in up to 5,825 individuals of European ancestry with diabetes and up to 46,061 without diabetes, followed by functional studies. Known associations of variants in CUBN, encoding cubilin, with the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) were confirmed in the overall sample (P = 2.4 × 10(-10)). Gene-by-diabetes interactions were detected and confirmed for variants in HS6ST1 and near RAB38/CTSC. Single nucleotide polymorphisms at these loci demonstrated a genetic effect on UACR in individuals with but not without diabetes. The change in the average UACR per minor allele was 21% for HS6ST1 (P = 6.3 × 10(-7)) and 13% for RAB38/CTSC (P = 5.8 × 10(-7)). Experiments using streptozotocin-induced diabetic Rab38 knockout and control rats showed higher urinary albumin concentrations and reduced amounts of megalin and cubilin at the proximal tubule cell surface in Rab38 knockout versus control rats. Relative expression of RAB38 was higher in tubuli of patients with diabetic kidney disease compared with control subjects. The loci identified here confirm known pathways and highlight novel pathways influencing albuminuria.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26631737 PMCID: PMC4764151 DOI: 10.2337/db15-1313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes ISSN: 0012-1797 Impact factor: 9.461
Replicated SNP associations with UACR in individuals with diabetes
| Sample size ( | Effect on log(UACR) mg/g | SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs649529, | |||||
| Discovery | 5,825 | −0.15 | 0.03 | 9.3 × 10−6 | 0 |
| Replication | 1,962 | −0.12 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0 |
| Combined | 7,787 | −0.14 | 0.03 | 5.8 × 10−7 | 0 |
| rs13427836, | |||||
| Discovery | 5,509 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 6.1 × 10−6 | 10 |
| Replication | 1,890 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 58 |
| Combined | 7,399 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 6.3 × 10−7 | 30 |
For both variants, the effect of each additional copy of the minor allele (T) on UACR was modeled in an additive fashion. I2 is provided as a measure of heterogeneity across studies. Imputation quality ranged from 0.41 to 1.0 for rs649529 and from 0.44 to 1.0 for rs13427836. The variants were directly genotyped in four of the replication studies, with a call rate ranging from 0.98 to 1.0 for rs649529 and from 0.99 to 1.0 for rs13427836. The estimated proportion of explained variance in UACR among those with diabetes is 0.6% for rs649529 and 0.5% for rs13427836, using the formula 2 × MAF × (1-MAF) × effect2/var(log[UACR]), based on the combined effect estimates from Table 1 and the phenotypic variance in the large population-based ARIC Study.
Figure 1Overview of associated genomic loci at RAB38/CTSC and HS6ST1 and consistent association with albuminuria in diabetes across the contributing studies. A: Regional association plot of the RAB38/CTSC locus on chromosome 11. B: The T allele at rs649529 is associated with lower UACR across discovery and replication studies. C: Regional association plot of the HS6ST1 locus on chromosome 10. D: The T allele of intronic rs13427836 is associated with higher UACR across discovery and replication studies. The solid squares indicate the mean difference and are proportional to the weights used in the meta-analysis. The solid vertical line indicates no effect. The diamond indicates the weighted mean difference, and the lateral tips of the diamond indicate the associated CIs. The horizontal lines represent the 95% CI.
Replicated SNP associations with additional kidney function and diabetes-related traits
| Trait | Effect (OR) | SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs649529, | |||||
| UACR, diabetes; log(mg/g) | 7,787 | −0.14 | 0.03 | 5.8 × 10−7 | 6.9 × 10−6 |
| UACR, no diabetes; log(mg/g) | 45,094 | −0.004 | 0.008 | 0.64 | |
| eGFRcrea, diabetes; log(mL/min/1.73 m2) | 11,527 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.46 | 2.8 × 10−1 |
| eGFRcrea, no diabetes; log(mL/min/1.73 m2) | 118,427 | −0.001 | 0.001 | 0.59 | |
| CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) | 118,114 | (1.01) | 0.02 | 0.57 | |
| Type 2 diabetes | 63,390 | (1.02) | 0.02 | 0.32 | |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 46,186 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.65 | |
| HbA1c (%) | 46,368 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.31 | |
| rs13427836, | |||||
| UACR, diabetes; log(mg/g) | 7,399 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 6.3 × 10−7 | 1.7 × 10−5 |
| UACR, no diabetes; log(mg/g) | 34,830 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.38 | |
| eGFRcrea, diabetes; log(mL/min/1.73 m2) | 11,092 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.13 | 1.3 × 10−1 |
| eGFRcrea, no diabetes; log(mL/min/1.73 m2) | 114,247 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.94 | |
| CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2) | 113,612 | (0.97) | 0.02 | 0.23 | |
| Type 2 diabetes | 63,390 | (1.00) | 0.03 | 0.94 | |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 46,186 | −0.005 | 0.004 | 0.22 | |
| HbA1c (%) | 46,368 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.61 | |
| rs10795433, | |||||
| UACR, diabetes; log(mg/g) | 5,825 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 2.0 × 10−5 | 8.2 × 10−4 |
| UACR, no diabetes; log(mg/g) | 46,061 | 0.045 | 0.01 | 8.7 × 10−6 | |
| eGFRcrea, diabetes; log(mL/min/1.73 m2) | 11,522 | 0.007 | 0.005 | 0.18 | 1.9 × 10−1 |
| eGFRcrea, no diabetes; log(mL/min/1.73 m2) | 118,299 | 0.0007 | 0.001 | 0.61 | |
| CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) | 118,121 | (1.04) | 0.02 | 0.08 | |
| Type 2 diabetes | 63,390 | (1.00) | 0.03 | 0.88 | |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 46,186 | −0.003 | 0.005 | 0.52 | |
| HbA1c (%) | 46,368 | −0.002 | 0.005 | 0.73 | |
DM, diabetes mellitus; eGFRcrea, GFR estimated by serum creatinine levels; OR, odds ratio.
Effects represent the change in trait associated with each additional copy of the minor allele for each of the SNPs. For continuous traits, units are provided; the effect for binary outcomes, shown in parentheses, represents the OR. Except for UACR in diabetes, estimates refer to the discovery samples of the respective trait and to the published resources for the glycemic traits. Fasting glucose and HbA1c were evaluated among individuals free of diabetes. For the kidney traits, P values and SEs are corrected using genomic control.
*P value for difference from a two-sample t test: t = (effectDM − effectnonDM)/(SEDM2 + SEnonDM2)0.5 which, for large sample sizes is distributed as a normal (0,1). The correlation between effectDM and effectnonDM is assumed to be 0.
Associations with type 2 diabetes were tested using the publicly available summary statistics dataset from the DIAGRAM (DIAbetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis) Consortium (12,171 case subjects and 56,862 control subjects) (40). Associations with fasting glucose and plasma hemoglobin A1c concentrations were evaluated using the publicly available results from the MAGIC Consortium (www.magicinvestigators.org) (41,42).
†UACR effect estimates for UACR in diabetes for CUBN are provided from the discovery stage.
Figure 2RAB38 and HS6ST1 expression across kidney tissues. A: Comparison of RAB38 and HS6ST1 expression (microarray) in tubuli and glomeruli of patients with DKD and control subjects shows significantly higher RAB38 expression in tubuli of DKD patients than in tubuli of control subjects (significance threshold 0.05/6 = 8.3 × 10−3 for investigating RAB38, CTSC, and HS6ST1 in tubuli and glomeruli). CTSC expression was not significantly different between DKD case subjects and control subjects in tubuli (P = 0.11) or glomeruli (P = 0.03). Expression levels are shown as robust multiarray average–processed gene intensity values. B: RAB38 and HS6ST1 transcript abundance quantified from RNA sequencing (RNAseq) is detected at high levels in human tubuli but also in glomerular cells. Transcripts were quantified by reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped (RPKM). The error bars in A and B correspond to the SEM.
Figure 3Comparison of Rab38 congenic, transgenic, and KO rats after induction of diabetes. A: Experimental setup and timeline. BP, blood pressure measurement via radio telemetry; MC, metabolic cage. B: Comparison of blood glucose concentrations. C: Comparison of mean arterial pressure. D: Comparison of urinary albumin concentrations. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 KO vs. transgenic, ##P < 0.01 KO vs. congenic. E: Expression of endocytic markers. Immunofluorescence staining for megalin (green, top panel) and cubilin (red, bottom panel) in kidneys from all three rat strains. Nuclei counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. The results for blood pressure measurement, urinary albumin excretion, and blood glucose were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey post hoc test.