Literature DB >> 21810492

Variation in childhood skeletal robustness is an important determinant of cortical area in young adults.

Siddharth Bhola1, Julia Chen, Joseph Fusco, G Felipe Duarte, Nelly Andarawis-Puri, Richard Ghillani, Karl J Jepsen.   

Abstract

A better understanding of bone growth will benefit efforts to reduce fracture incidence, because variation in elderly bone traits is determined primarily by adulthood. The natural variation in robustness was used as a model to understand how variable growth patterns define adult bone morphology. Longitudinally acquired hand radiographs of 29 boys and 30 girls were obtained from the Bolton-Brush study for 6 time points spanning 8 to 18 years of age. Segregating individuals into tertiles based on robustness revealed that the biological activity underlying bone growth varied significantly with the natural variation in robustness. For boys, slender metacarpals used an osteoblast-dependent growth pattern to establish function, whereas robust metacarpals used an osteoclast-dependent growth pattern. In contrast, differences in biological activity between girls with slender and robust metacarpals were largely based on the age at which the marrow surface changed from expansion to infilling. Importantly, cortical area for slender metacarpals was as much as 19.7% and 32.2% lower than robust metacarpals for boys and girls, respectively, indicating that robustness was a major determinant of adult cortical area. Finally, after accounting for robustness and body weight effects, we found that the inter-individual variation in cortical area was established as early as 8 years of age. While variation in the amount of bone acquired during growth has primarily been attributed to factors like nutrition, exercise, and genetic background, we showed that the natural variation in robustness was also a major determinant of cortical area, which is an important determinant of bone mass. This predictable relationship between robustness and cortical area should be incorporated into clinical diagnostic measures and experimental studies.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21810492      PMCID: PMC3167032          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  40 in total

1.  Construction of the femoral neck during growth determines its strength in old age.

Authors:  Roger M D Zebaze; Anthony Jones; Mark Knackstedt; Ghassan Maalouf; Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Familial resemblance for bone mineral mass is expressed before puberty.

Authors:  S Ferrari; R Rizzoli; D Slosman; J P Bonjour
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Quantitative genetics of cortical bone mass in healthy 10-year-old children from the Fels Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Dana L Duren; Richard J Sherwood; Audrey C Choh; Stefan A Czerwinski; Wm Cameron Chumlea; Miryoung Lee; Shumei S Sun; Ellen W Demerath; Roger M Siervogel; Bradford Towne
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Varying contributions of growth and ageing to racial and sex differences in femoral neck structure and strength in old age.

Authors:  Xiao-Fang Wang; Yunbo Duan; Thomas J Beck; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Tracking of bone mass and density during childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Heidi J Kalkwarf; Vicente Gilsanz; Joan M Lappe; Sharon Oberfield; John A Shepherd; Thomas N Hangartner; Xangke Huang; Margaret M Frederick; Karen K Winer; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Bone mineral content in children with fractures.

Authors:  L Landin; B E Nilsson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A genome wide linkage scan of metacarpal size and geometry in the Framingham Study.

Authors:  David Karasik; Nicole A Shimabuku; Yanhua Zhou; Yuqing Zhang; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel; Serkalem Demissie
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.937

8.  Section modulus is the optimum geometric predictor for stress fractures and medial tibial stress syndrome in both male and female athletes.

Authors:  Melanie Franklyn; Barry Oakes; Bruce Field; Peter Wells; David Morgan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  The area moment of inertia of the tibia: a risk factor for stress fractures.

Authors:  C Milgrom; M Giladi; A Simkin; N Rand; R Kedem; H Kashtan; M Stein; M Gomori
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Fernando Rivadeneira; M Carola Zillikens; Chris Edh De Laet; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Thomas J Beck; Huibert Ap Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  8 in total

1.  Femoral Neck External Size but not aBMD Predicts Structural and Mass Changes for Women Transitioning Through Menopause.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Andrew Kozminski; Erin Mr Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; Robert W Goulet; Sioban D Harlow; Jane A Cauley; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  External bone size identifies different strength-decline trajectories for the male human femora.

Authors:  Morgan W Bolger; Genevieve E Romanowicz; Erin M R Bigelow; Ferrous S Ward; Antonio Ciarelli; Karl J Jepsen; David H Kohn
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Mapping the natural variation in whole bone stiffness and strength across skeletal sites.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Erin M R Bigelow; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Are we taking full advantage of the growing number of pharmacological treatment options for osteoporosis?

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Stephen H Schlecht; Kenneth M Kozloff
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.547

5.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, epigenetics, and skeletal system dysfunction: exploration of links using bisphenol A as a model system.

Authors:  Frances Xin; Lauren M Smith; Martha Susiarjo; Marisa S Bartolomei; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Environ Epigenet       Date:  2018-04-26

6.  Differential changes in bone strength of two inbred mouse strains following administration of a sclerostin-neutralizing antibody during growth.

Authors:  Noah J Mathis; Emily N Adaniya; Lauren M Smith; Alexander G Robling; Karl J Jepsen; Stephen H Schlecht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sex and External Size Specific Limitations in Assessing Bone Health From Adult Hand Radiographs.

Authors:  Erin M R Bigelow; Robert W Goulet; Antonio Ciarelli; Stephen H Schlecht; David H Kohn; Todd L Bredbenner; Sioban D Harlow; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-06-29

8.  Differential Adaptive Response of Growing Bones From Two Female Inbred Mouse Strains to Voluntary Cage-Wheel Running.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Melissa A Ramcharan; Yueqin Yang; Lauren M Smith; Erin Mr Bigelow; Bonnie T Nolan; Drew E Moss; Maureen J Devlin; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2018-02-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.