Literature DB >> 27773708

The impact of an IUD and implant intervention on dual method use among young women: Results from a cluster randomized trial.

Alison M El Ayadi1, Corinne H Rocca2, Julia E Kohn3, Denisse Velazquez4, Maya Blum2, Sara J Newmann2, Cynthia C Harper2.   

Abstract

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are highly effective at preventing pregnancy but do not protect against sexually transmitted infection (STI). Recent efforts to improve access to intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants have raised concerns about STI prevention and reduced condom use, particularly among teenagers and young women. We evaluated whether a provider-targeted intervention to increase LARC access negatively impacted dual method use and STI incidence among an at-risk patient population. We conducted a cluster randomized trial in 40 reproductive health centers across the United States from May 2011 to May 2013. After training providers at 20 intervention sites, we recruited 1500 sexually-active women aged 18-25years who did not desire pregnancy and followed them for one year. We assessed intervention effects on dual method use, condom use and STI incidence, modeling dual method use with generalized estimating equations and STI incidence with Cox proportional hazard regression models, accounting for clustering. We found no differences between intervention and control groups in dual method use (14.3% vs. 14.4%, aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.74-1.44) or condom use (30% vs. 31%, aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.79-1.35) at last sex at one year. STI incidence was 16.5 per 100 person-years and did not differ between intervention and control groups (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 0.88-1.64). A provider training intervention to increase LARC access neither compromised condom use nor increased STI incidence among young women. Dual method use was very low overall, highlighting the need to bolster STI prevention efforts among adolescents and young women.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Condoms; Etonogestrel; Female adolescents; Female contraceptive devices; Intrauterine contraceptive devices; Sexually transmitted diseases

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27773708      PMCID: PMC6373723          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  29 in total

1.  Condom practices of urban teens using Norplant contraceptive implants, oral contraceptives, and condoms for contraception.

Authors:  P D Darney; L S Callegari; A Swift; E S Atkinson; A M Robert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Condoms for dual protection: patterns of use with highly effective contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Michael R Kramer; Carol J Hogue
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.

Authors:  J Power; R French; F Cowan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

4.  Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2006-2010 national survey of family growth.

Authors:  Gladys Martinez; Casey E Copen; Joyce C Abma
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2011-10

Review 5.  Effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  King K Holmes; Ruth Levine; Marcia Weaver
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 6.  Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.

Authors:  R French; H Van Vliet; F Cowan; D Mansour; S Morris; D Hughes; A Robinson; T Proctor; C Summerbell; S Logan; F Helmerhorst; J Guillebaud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

Review 7.  Copper-containing, framed intrauterine devices for contraception: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Paul A O'Brien; Regina Kulier; Frans M Helmerhorst; Margaret Usher-Patel; Catherine d'Arcangues
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 8.  Copper containing, framed intra-uterine devices for contraception.

Authors:  R Kulier; P A O'Brien; F M Helmerhorst; M Usher-Patel; C D'Arcangues
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

Review 9.  Through the looking glass: understanding non-inferiority.

Authors:  Jennifer Schumi; Janet T Wittes
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Correlates of dual-method contraceptive use: an analysis of the National Survey Of Family Growth (2006-2008).

Authors:  David L Eisenberg; Jenifer E Allsworth; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02-14
View more
  6 in total

1.  Condom use and incident sexually transmitted infection after initiation of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Colleen P McNicholas; Jessica B Klugman; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception, Condom Use, and Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Riley J Steiner; Sanjana Pampati; Katherine M Kortsmit; Nicole Liddon; Andrea Swartzendruber; Karen Pazol
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.604

3.  Intrauterine Devices and Sexually Transmitted Infection among Older Adolescents and Young Adults in a Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Alison M El Ayadi; Corinne H Rocca; Sarah H Averbach; Suzan Goodman; Philip D Darney; Ashlesha Patel; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.046

4.  Implementation science: Scaling a training intervention to include IUDs and implants in contraceptive services in primary care.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Alison B Comfort; Maya Blum; Corinne H Rocca; Charles E McCulloch; Lavanya Rao; Nishant Shah; Helen Oquendo Del Toro; Suzan Goodman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.637

5.  Improving Capacity at School-based Health Centers to Offer Adolescents Counseling and Access to Comprehensive Contraceptive Services.

Authors:  Alison B Comfort; Lavanya Rao; Suzan Goodman; Angela Barney; Angela Glymph; Rosalyn Schroeder; Charles McCulloch; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 1.814

6.  Positive deviance for dual-method promotion among women in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hodaka Kosugi; Akira Shibanuma; Junko Kiriya; Ken Ing Cherng Ong; Stephen Mucunguzi; Conrad Muzoora; Masamine Jimba
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.