Literature DB >> 33079610

The Relation of Articulatory and Vocal Auditory-Motor Control in Typical Speakers.

Rosemary A Lester-Smith1, Ayoub Daliri1, Nicole Enos2,3, Defne Abur1, Ashling A Lupiani1, Sophia Letcher4, Cara E Stepp1,2,5.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between feedback and feedforward control of articulation and voice by measuring reflexive and adaptive responses to first formant (F 1) and fundamental frequency (f o) perturbations. In addition, perception of F 1 and f o perturbation was estimated using passive (listening) and active (speaking) just noticeable difference paradigms to assess the relation of auditory acuity to reflexive and adaptive responses. Method Twenty healthy women produced single words and sustained vowels while the F 1 or f o of their auditory feedback was suddenly and unpredictably perturbed to assess reflexive responses or gradually and predictably perturbed to assess adaptive responses. Results Typical speakers' reflexive responses to sudden perturbation of F 1 were related to their adaptive responses to gradual perturbation of F 1. Specifically, speakers with larger reflexive responses to sudden perturbation of F 1 had larger adaptive responses to gradual perturbation of F 1. Furthermore, their reflexive responses to sudden perturbation of F 1 were associated with their passive auditory acuity to F 1 such that speakers with better auditory acuity to F 1 produced larger reflexive responses to sudden perturbations of F 1. Typical speakers' adaptive responses to gradual perturbation of F 1 were not associated with their auditory acuity to F 1. Speakers' reflexive and adaptive responses to perturbation of f o were not related, nor were their responses related to either measure of auditory acuity to f o. Conclusion These findings indicate that there may be disparate feedback and feedforward control mechanisms for articulatory and vocal error correction based on auditory feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33079610     DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  12 in total

1.  Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Tiffany Voon; Monique Tardif; Dante Cilento; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  LaDIVA: A neurocomputational model providing laryngeal motor control for speech acquisition and production.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Gabriel A Alzamendi; Gabriel J Cler; Frank H Guenther; Cara E Stepp; Matías Zañartu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  The Effects of Masked and Delayed Auditory Feedback on Fundamental Frequency Modulation in Vocal Vibrato.

Authors:  Rosemary A Lester-Smith; Allison Hilger; Kylie E Dunne-Platero; Jason H Kim; Chun Liang Chan; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Drifting pitch awareness after exposure to altered auditory feedback.

Authors:  Matthias K Franken; Robert J Hartsuiker; Petter Johansson; Lars Hall; Andreas Lind
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Feedback and Feedforward Auditory-Motor Processes for Voice and Articulation in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Defne Abur; Austeja Subaciute; Ayoub Daliri; Rosemary A Lester-Smith; Ashling A Lupiani; Dante Cilento; Nicole M Enos; Hasini R Weerathunge; Monique C Tardif; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  Triangular body-cover model of the vocal folds with coordinated activation of the five intrinsic laryngeal muscles.

Authors:  Gabriel A Alzamendi; Sean D Peterson; Byron D Erath; Robert E Hillman; Matías Zañartu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Assessing Ecologically Valid Methods of Auditory Feedback Measurement in Individuals With Typical Speech.

Authors:  Nicole E Tomassi; Hasini R Weerathunge; Megan R Cushman; Jason W Bohland; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.674

8.  Speech compensation responses and sensorimotor adaptation to formant feedback perturbations.

Authors:  Inez Raharjo; Hardik Kothare; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Impaired auditory discrimination and auditory-motor integration in hyperfunctional voice disorders.

Authors:  Defne Abur; Austeja Subaciute; Mara Kapsner-Smith; Roxanne K Segina; Lauren F Tracy; J Pieter Noordzij; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  A Computational Model for Estimating the Speech Motor System's Sensitivity to Auditory Prediction Errors.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.