Literature DB >> 35088392

Drifting pitch awareness after exposure to altered auditory feedback.

Matthias K Franken1,2, Robert J Hartsuiker3, Petter Johansson4, Lars Hall4, Andreas Lind4.   

Abstract

Various studies have claimed that the sense of agency is based on a comparison between an internal estimate of an action's outcome and sensory feedback. With respect to speech, this presumes that speakers have a stable prearticulatory representation of their own speech. However, recent research suggests that the sense of agency is flexible and thus in some contexts we may feel like we produced speech that was not actually produced by us. The current study tested whether the estimated pitch of one's articulation (termed pitch awareness) is affected by manipulated auditory feedback. In four experiments, 56 participants produced isolated vowels while being exposed to pitch-shifted auditory feedback. After every vocalization, participants indicated whether they thought the feedback was higher or lower than their actual production. After exposure to a block of high-pitched auditory feedback (+500 cents pitch shift), participants were more likely to label subsequent auditory feedback as "lower than my actual production," suggesting that prolonged exposure to high-pitched auditory feedback led to a drift in participants' pitch awareness. The opposite pattern was found after exposure to a constant -500 cents pitch shift. This suggests that pitch awareness is not solely based on a prearticulatory representation of intended speech or on a sensory prediction, but also on sensory feedback. We propose that this drift in pitch awareness could be indicative of a sense of agency over the pitch-shifted auditory feedback in the exposure block. If so, this suggests that the sense of agency over vocal output is flexible.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor control; Speech perception; Speech production

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35088392     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02441-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.157


  25 in total

1.  Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex.

Authors:  T C Hain; T A Burnett; S Kiran; C R Larson; S Singh; M K Kenney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Abnormalities in the awareness of action.

Authors:  Sarah Jayne Blakemore; Daniel M. Wolpert; Christopher D. Frith
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  The self in action: lessons from delusions of control.

Authors:  Chris Frith
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2005-08-10

5.  Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback.

Authors:  T A Burnett; M B Freedland; C R Larson; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Speaking with an alien voice: Flexible sense of agency during vocal production.

Authors:  Matthias K Franken; Robert J Hartsuiker; Petter Johansson; Lars Hall; Andreas Lind
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Sense of agency in the human brain.

Authors:  Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Does passive sound attenuation affect responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback?

Authors:  Matthias K Franken; Robert J Hartsuiker; Petter Johansson; Lars Hall; Tijmen Wartenberg; Andreas Lind
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Embodiment in a virtual body that speaks produces agency over the speaking but does not necessarily influence subsequent real speaking.

Authors:  Domna Banakou; Mel Slater
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.