Literature DB >> 33074101

Quantitative dissection of transcription in development yields evidence for transcription-factor-driven chromatin accessibility.

Elizabeth Eck1, Jonathan Liu2, Maryam Kazemzadeh-Atoufi3, Sydney Ghoreishi4, Shelby A Blythe5, Hernan G Garcia1,2,4,6.   

Abstract

Thermodynamic models of gene regulation can predict transcriptional regulation in bacteria, but in eukaryotes, chromatin accessibility and energy expenditure may call for a different framework. Here, we systematically tested the predictive power of models of DNA accessibility based on the Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) model of allostery, which posits that chromatin fluctuates between accessible and inaccessible states. We dissected the regulatory dynamics of hunchback by the activator Bicoid and the pioneer-like transcription factor Zelda in living Drosophila embryos and showed that no thermodynamic or non-equilibrium MWC model can recapitulate hunchback transcription. Therefore, we explored a model where DNA accessibility is not the result of thermal fluctuations but is catalyzed by Bicoid and Zelda, possibly through histone acetylation, and found that this model can predict hunchback dynamics. Thus, our theory-experiment dialogue uncovered potential molecular mechanisms of transcriptional regulatory dynamics, a key step toward reaching a predictive understanding of developmental decision-making.
© 2020, Eck et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D. melanogaster; bicoid; chromatin; hunchback; live imaging; physics of living systems; thermodynamic models; zelda

Year:  2020        PMID: 33074101      PMCID: PMC7738189          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.56429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  113 in total

1.  Identifying DNA and protein patterns with statistically significant alignments of multiple sequences.

Authors:  G Z Hertz; G D Stormo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Dynamical analysis of regulatory interactions in the gap gene system of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Johannes Jaeger; Maxim Blagov; David Kosman; Konstantin N Kozlov; Ekaterina Myasnikova; Svetlana Surkova; Carlos E Vanario-Alonso; Maria Samsonova; David H Sharp; John Reinitz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Progression of the cell cycle through mitosis leads to abortion of nascent transcripts.

Authors:  A W Shermoen; P H O'Farrell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-10-18       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The nonequilibrium mechanism for ultrasensitivity in a biological switch: sensing by Maxwell's demons.

Authors:  Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Parameters controlling transcriptional activation during early Drosophila development.

Authors:  B A Edgar; G Schubiger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-03-28       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Decision making at a subcellular level determines the outcome of bacteriophage infection.

Authors:  Lanying Zeng; Samuel O Skinner; Chenghang Zong; Jean Sippy; Michael Feiss; Ido Golding
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Dynamic multifactor hubs interact transiently with sites of active transcription in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Mustafa Mir; Michael R Stadler; Stephan A Ortiz; Colleen E Hannon; Melissa M Harrison; Xavier Darzacq; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Interplay between positive and negative activities that influence the role of Bicoid in transcription.

Authors:  Dechen Fu; Jun Ma
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Combining protein and mRNA quantification to decipher transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Heng Xu; Leonardo A Sepúlveda; Lauren Figard; Anna Marie Sokac; Ido Golding
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Precision of Readout at the hunchback Gene: Analyzing Short Transcription Time Traces in Living Fly Embryos.

Authors:  Jonathan Desponds; Huy Tran; Teresa Ferraro; Tanguy Lucas; Carmina Perez Romero; Aurelien Guillou; Cecile Fradin; Mathieu Coppey; Nathalie Dostatni; Aleksandra M Walczak
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantitative dissection of transcription in development yields evidence for transcription-factor-driven chromatin accessibility.

Authors:  Elizabeth Eck; Jonathan Liu; Maryam Kazemzadeh-Atoufi; Sydney Ghoreishi; Shelby A Blythe; Hernan G Garcia
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Notch-dependent and -independent transcription are modulated by tissue movements at gastrulation.

Authors:  Julia Falo-Sanjuan; Sarah Bray
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Differential regulation of alternative promoters emerges from unified kinetics of enhancer-promoter interaction.

Authors:  Jingyao Wang; Shihe Zhang; Hongfang Lu; Heng Xu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Synthetic reconstruction of the hunchback promoter specifies the role of Bicoid, Zelda and Hunchback in the dynamics of its transcription.

Authors:  Gonçalo Fernandes; Huy Tran; Maxime Andrieu; Youssoupha Diaw; Carmina Perez Romero; Cécile Fradin; Mathieu Coppey; Aleksandra M Walczak; Nathalie Dostatni
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 5.  Gene Regulation and Cellular Metabolism: An Essential Partnership.

Authors:  Richard W Carthew
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 6.  Logic and lineage impacts on functional transcription factor deployment for T-cell fate commitment.

Authors:  Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.699

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.