Literature DB >> 33068398

Longitudinal plasma p-tau217 is increased in early stages of Alzheimer's disease.

Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren1,2,3, Shorena Janelidze1, Sebastian Palmqvist1,4, Nicholas Cullen1,3, Anna L Svenningsson1,4, Olof Strandberg1, David Mengel5, Dominic M Walsh5, Erik Stomrud1,4, Jeffrey L Dage6, Oskar Hansson1,4.   

Abstract

Plasma levels of tau phosphorylated at threonine-217 (p-tau217) is a candidate tool to monitor Alzheimer's disease. We studied 150 cognitively unimpaired participants and 100 patients with mild cognitive impairment in the Swedish BioFINDER study. P-tau217 was measured repeatedly for up to 6 years (median three samples per person, median time from first to last sample, 4.3 years). Preclinical (amyloid-β-positive cognitively unimpaired, n = 62) and prodromal (amyloid-β-positive mild cognitive impairment, n = 49) Alzheimer's disease had accelerated p-tau217 compared to amyloid-β-negative cognitively unimpaired (β  =  0.56, P < 0.001, using linear mixed effects models) and amyloid-β-negative mild cognitive impairment patients (β  =  0.67, P < 0.001), respectively. Mild cognitive impairment patients who later converted to Alzheimer's disease dementia (n = 40) had accelerated p-tau217 compared to other mild cognitive impairment patients (β  =  0.79, P < 0.001). P-tau217 did not change in amyloid-β-negative participants, or in patients with mild cognitive impairment who did not convert to Alzheimer's disease dementia. For 80% power, 109 participants per arm were required to observe a slope reduction in amyloid-β-positive cognitively unimpaired (71 participants per arm in amyloid-β-positive mild cognitive impairment). Longitudinal increases in p-tau217 correlated with longitudinal worsening of cognition and brain atrophy. In summary, plasma p-tau217 increases during early Alzheimer's disease and can be used to monitor disease progression.
© The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; biomarker; p-tau; p-tau217; plasma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33068398      PMCID: PMC7719022          DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


See Teunissen

Introduction

Minimally invasive blood-based biomarkers have the potential to improve clinical management of Alzheimer’s disease and design of clinical trials. Promising results have been reported for blood-based biomarkers for core features of Alzheimer’s disease, including amyloid-β peptides (Palmqvist ; Schindler ), neurodegeneration biomarkers (including neurofilament light, NfL) (Mattsson , 2019), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) (Mielke , Janelidze ; Thijssen ). Plasma p-tau measures have been validated against CSF p-tau, and PET measurements of tau. Multiple tau phosphorylation epitopes exist, of which p-tau181 and p-tau217 have been studied as biomarkers (Barthélemy ). In CSF, p-tau217 performs better than p-tau181, both for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, and for correlations with tau PET (Janelidze ). We have recently found similar results for plasma p-tau217 when compared to p-tau181 (Palmqvist ), but data are lacking on longitudinal plasma p-tau217, and its use for monitoring disease progression. We therefore measured plasma p-tau217 over time in cognitively unimpaired individuals, and in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We tested if p-tau217 increased over time at the preclinical (amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired) and prodromal stages (amyloid-β+ MCI) of Alzheimer’s disease, and if the trajectories differed between Alzheimer’s disease and other causes of cognitive impairment. For comparison, we included a non-specific marker of neurodegeneration (plasma NfL). We also tested if changes in p-tau217 correlated with changes in cognition or atrophy.

Materials and methods

Participants

Participants were recruited in the prospective Swedish BioFINDER study (www.biofinder.se), including cognitively unimpaired individuals (cognitively healthy controls or individuals with subjective cognitive decline, SCD), and patients with MCI. Details on recruitment, exclusion and inclusion criteria have been presented previously (Mattsson ; Ossenkoppele ). All subjects underwent lumbar puncture at baseline for CSF sampling. Plasma samples were taken at baseline and every second year for up to 6 years. Clinical assessments for determination of conversion to dementia were done annually (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographics

Amyloid-β− CUAmyloid-β+ CUAmyloid-β− MCIAmyloid-β+ MCI
n = 88 n = 62 n = 51 n = 49
Clinical diagnosis (healthy controls/SCD/MCI)49/39/046/16/00/0/510/0/49
Age, years70.7 (4.9)72.7 (5.2)69.5 (5.8)71.0 (5.2)
Sex, M/F35/5323/3938/1326/23
Education, years12.2 (3.0)12.2 (3.7)11.2 (3.4)12.1 (3.5)
APOE ε4, −/+67/2126/3638/1311/38
Baseline p-tau217, ng/l1.18 (1.64)1.71 (1.49)1.80 (1.74)4.56 (3.11)
Time from first to last p-tau217 sample, years5.2 (1.5)4.5 (1.2)2.7 (1.9)4.0 (2.0)
Number of plasma p-tau217 measures, 1/2/3/44/4/44/361/12/39/1012/22/16/17/14/18/10
Baseline NfL, ng/l12.3 (5.0)13.9 (5.8)17.6 (8.5)16.7 (7.1)
Number of plasma NfL measures, 0/1/2/3/40/4/5/44/356/2/9/39/62/13/20/15/17/8/9/15/10
MMSE at baseline, points29.1 (1.2)28.9 (1.1)27.5 (2.0)26.9 (1.7)
MMSE change/year, points−0.05 (0.32)−0.35 (0.65)−1.00 (1.18)−1.55 (1.12)
mPACC at baseline, points0.22 (0.63)−0.17 (0.81)−1.21 (0.71)−1.51 (0.62)
mPACC change/year, points−0.03 (0.13)−0.13 (0.25)−0.24 (0.29)−0.34 (0.30)
Number of cognitive assessments, 0/1/2/3/41/4/3/22/57/10/1/1/37/232/12/16/12/8/10/7/4/11/19/8
Time from first to last cognitive test, years5.2 (1.1)4.5 (1.0)3.5 (1.4)4.7 (1.3)
Conversion to dementia, none/non-AD dementiaa/AD dementia80/8/052/2/812/35/3b1/11/37
Time-at-risk for dementia, years5.9 (1.4)5.1 (1.5)3.2 (1.8)3.0 (1.6)
Temporal cortical thickness at baseline, mm2.59 (0.16)2.52 (0.20)2.47 (0.22)2.45 (0.17)
Temporal cortical thickness change/year, points−0.013 (0.015)−0.028 (0.021)−0.039 (0.042)−0.065 (0.030)
Hippocampal volume at baseline, mm33363 (447)3250 (410)3297 (503)2899 (413)
Hippocampal volume change/year, points−38 (28)−57 (39)−77 (58)−94 (34)
Number of MRI scans, 0/1/2/3/410/ 2/15/36/256/2/12/34/815/5/17/12/28/4/9/19/9
Time from first to last scan, years4.5 (1.6)4.2 (1.5)3.0 (1.8)3.9 (1.8)

Continuous data are mean (SD). Time-at-risk for dementia was the overall clinical follow-up, or the time until a dementia diagnosis. The distribution of APOE ε4 was balanced between males (53% APOE ε4−, 47% APOE ε4+) and females (60% APOE ε4−, 40% APOE ε4+, P = 0.33) (chi-square test). AD = Alzheimer’s disease; CU = cognitively unimpaired; SCD = subjective cognitive decline.

Amyloid-β− CU: six vascular dementia, one Parkinson’s disease dementia/Lewy body dementia, one frontotemporal lobe dementia; Amyloid-β+ CU: one Parkinson’s disease dementia/Lewy body dementia, one frontotemporal lobe dementia; Amyloid-β− MCI: 18 vascular dementia, 10 Parkinson’s disease dementia/dementia with Lewy bodies, seven frontotemporal lobe dementia, one other dementia; Amyloid-β+ MCI: three vascular dementia, seven Parkinson’s disease dementia/Lewy body dementia, one frontotemporal lobe dementia.

Data were missing on dementia conversion in one amyloid-β− MCI patient.

Demographics Continuous data are mean (SD). Time-at-risk for dementia was the overall clinical follow-up, or the time until a dementia diagnosis. The distribution of APOE ε4 was balanced between males (53% APOE ε4−, 47% APOE ε4+) and females (60% APOE ε4−, 40% APOE ε4+, P = 0.33) (chi-square test). AD = Alzheimer’s disease; CU = cognitively unimpaired; SCD = subjective cognitive decline. Amyloid-β− CU: six vascular dementia, one Parkinson’s disease dementia/Lewy body dementia, one frontotemporal lobe dementia; Amyloid-β+ CU: one Parkinson’s disease dementia/Lewy body dementia, one frontotemporal lobe dementia; Amyloid-β− MCI: 18 vascular dementia, 10 Parkinson’s disease dementia/dementia with Lewy bodies, seven frontotemporal lobe dementia, one other dementia; Amyloid-β+ MCI: three vascular dementia, seven Parkinson’s disease dementia/Lewy body dementia, one frontotemporal lobe dementia. Data were missing on dementia conversion in one amyloid-β− MCI patient.

Fluid biomarkers

Plasma p-tau217 was measured using immunoassays at Lilly Research Laboratories (Palmqvist ). Plasma NfL was measured using the Quanterix NfL Advantage kit as described before (Mengel ). A few outliers were removed for NfL [concentrations > mean + 3 standard deviations (SD), n = 8 of 668 data-points]. CSF amyloid-β42 and amyloid-β40 were measured using Meso Scale Discovery immunoassays (MSD). The CSF amyloid-β42/amyloid-β40 ratio (pathological if <0.091) was used to determine amyloid-β-positivity (Janelidze ).

Cognitive measures

We used the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Folstein ) and a cognitive composite (modified Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite, mPACC) (Donohue ). The mPACC was calculated as the average of five z-scores, for tests of memory [the delayed recall test from the cognitive subscale from the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog), counted twice in order to preserve the weight on memory from the original PACC (Donohue )], verbal ability (animal fluency), executive function (Trail Making Test B) (Delis ), and global cognition (MMSE). Animal fluency was included since category fluency tests may improve detection of early cognitive decline related to amyloid-β pathology (Papp ). We restricted the cognitive test data to assessments done within 1 year of plasma sampling.

MRI measures

Anatomical T1-weighted imaging was performed on a 3 T magnetic resonance scanner (Siemens Tim Trio 3T) producing MP-RAGE images (repetition time = 1.950 ms, echo time = 3.4 ms, 1 mm isotropic voxels, 178 slices) used in the anatomical segmentation and cortical thickness calculations. These were performed using the Freesurfer image analysis pipeline v6.0 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/), where each time points’ scan was first processed separately. After brain extraction and intensity homogeneity correction, grey and white matter segmentation using intensity gradient and voxel connectivity, cortical modelling allowed parcellation of cerebral cortex into subunits of gyral and sulcal structure. Cortical thickness was measured as the distance from the grey–white matter boundary to corresponding pial surface. Reliable thickness and volume measures were then extracted by entering each subject’s processed scans at various time points into FreeSurfer’s longitudinal stream (Reuter ), creating an unbiased within-subject template over all time points, then used to improve robustness of several processing steps and increase reliability of final results. For the analyses in this paper, we used cortical thickness (adjusted for surface area) from a temporal meta-region of interest (consisting of bilateral entorhinal, fusiform, inferior temporal and middle temporal cortex) and hippocampal volume (averaged between the hemispheres). We restricted the MRI data to scans done within 1 year of plasma sampling.

Statistical analysis

First, we tested longitudinal p-tau217 changes in linear mixed effects (LME) models. We tested the interaction between time and amyloid-β status as a predictor in both cognitively unimpaired and MCI. We also tested the interaction between time and conversion to Alzheimer’s disease dementia as a predictor in MCI. Similar models were fitted for NfL. The LME models were adjusted for age and sex and included random intercepts and slopes. Risk for conversion to Alzheimer’s disease dementia was also tested in a Cox survival analysis. Second, a power analysis (n = 500 bootstrap trials) was performed for p-tau217 in amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired and MCI groups, with trial duration assumed to be 48 months for cognitively unimpaired and 18 months for MCI, while follow-up was assumed to occur every 3 months. Third, associations were tested between longitudinal change in p-tau217 and longitudinal measures of cognition and brain structure, in LME models with the interaction between time and plasma p-tau217 slopes as the independent variable, adjusted for age, sex and (for cognitive measures) years of education or (for hippocampal volume) intracranial volume. Statistical analysis was done using R version 4.0.0. Significance was determined at P < 0.05 (two-tailed).

Data availability

Anonymized data will be shared by request from a qualified academic investigator for the sole purpose of replicating procedures and results presented in the article and as long as data transfer is in agreement with EU legislation on the general data protection regulation and decisions by the Ethical Review Board of Sweden and Region Skåne, which should be regulated in a material transfer agreement.

Results

Longitudinal plasma p-tau217 in different diagnostic groups

See Table 1 for demographics. During the clinical follow-up of all cases, 145 did not develop dementia, 48 developed Alzheimer’s disease dementia, and 56 developed other dementias (Table 1). Longitudinal p-tau217 data are shown in Fig. 1. In the cognitively unimpaired, p-tau217 had a trend towards higher levels in amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired compared to amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired at baseline [β  =  0.50 (meaning 0.50 ng/l higher levels in amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired), P = 0.053], remained stable over time in amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired (β  =  0.11, P = 0.30), and increased significantly over time in amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired compared to amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired (Fig. 1A) [time × amyloid-β-interaction: β  =  0.56 (meaning an acceleration in amyloid-β+ of 0.56 ng/l per year, compared to the rate in amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired), P < 0.001; the increased rate corresponds to 32.7% change per year from baseline in amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired].
Figure 1

Longitudinal plasma p-tau217 and NfL. Subject-specific biomarker data are shown together with main effects from linear mixed effects models, adjusted for age and sex, for p-tau217 in (A) amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired (CU) versus amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (B) amyloid-β− MCI versus amyloid-β+ MCI, and (C) MCI to Alzheimer’s disease dementia converters versus the remaining MCI population (i.e. stable MCI or MCI to other dementia converters), and for NfL in (D) amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired versus amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (E) amyloid-β− MCI versus amyloid-β+ MCI, and (F) MCI to Alzheimer’s disease dementia converters versus the remaining MCI population. Aβ = amyloid-β; AD = Alzheimer’s disease; y = years.

Longitudinal plasma p-tau217 and NfL. Subject-specific biomarker data are shown together with main effects from linear mixed effects models, adjusted for age and sex, for p-tau217 in (A) amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired (CU) versus amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (B) amyloid-β− MCI versus amyloid-β+ MCI, and (C) MCI to Alzheimer’s disease dementia converters versus the remaining MCI population (i.e. stable MCI or MCI to other dementia converters), and for NfL in (D) amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired versus amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (E) amyloid-β− MCI versus amyloid-β+ MCI, and (F) MCI to Alzheimer’s disease dementia converters versus the remaining MCI population. Aβ = amyloid-β; AD = Alzheimer’s disease; y = years. In MCI, p-tau217 was significantly higher in amyloid-β+ MCI at baseline (β  =  2.65, P < 0.001). Phosphorylated-tau217 levels remained stable over time in the amyloid-β− MCI group (β  =  0.12, P = 0.39), whereas it increased in amyloid-β+ MCI (Fig. 1B) (time × amyloid-β-interaction: β  =  0.67, P = 0.00032; the increased rate corresponds to 14.7% change per year from baseline in amyloid-β+ MCI). P-tau217 was also higher at baseline in MCI patients who subsequently developed Alzheimer’s disease dementia (this included three amyloid-β− MCI patients, as the Alzheimer’s disease dementia diagnosis was blinded to biomarker results) compared to the remaining MCI group (including both stable MCI and MCI who converted to other dementias) (β  =  2.25, P < 0.001). P-tau217 remained stable over time in MCI patients who did not develop Alzheimer’s disease dementia (β  =  0.053, P = 0.68), but increased significantly over time in MCI to Alzheimer’s disease dementia converters (Fig. 1C) (time × conversion interaction: β  =  0.79, P < 0.0001). These results for conversion to Alzheimer’s disease dementia were corroborated in a Cox survival analysis [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.25 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.11–1.40), P < 0.001]. Similar results were obtained when stable MCI patients were excluded and the comparison was limited to MCI to Alzheimer’s disease dementia converters versus those with MCI who converted to other dementias (baseline difference: β  =  1.91, P = 0.002; stable over time in non-Alzheimer’s disease MCI: β  =  0.020, P = 0.92; acceleration in MCI to Alzheimer’s disease dementia converters; time × conversion interaction: β  =  0.82, P = 0.00054).

Longitudinal plasma neurofilament light in different diagnostic groups

Results for plasma NfL are shown in the lower part of Fig. 1. Among the cognitively unimpaired (Fig. 1D), there was no effect of amyloid-β status at baseline NfL (P = 0.38). There was a slight increase over time in NfL in the cognitively unimpaired independent of amyloid-β status (main effect of time in amyloid-β cognitively unimpaired, β  =  0.60, P < 0.001; no difference depending on amyloid-β status, P = 0.79). The findings were similar in MCI (Fig. 1E), with no effect of amyloid-β status at baseline (P = 0.57) and a slight increase over time (main effect of time in amyloid-β MCI, β  =  1.47, P < 0.001; no difference depending on amyloid-β status, P = 0.45). MCI patients who did not convert to Alzheimer’s disease dementia had higher baseline plasma NfL compared with patients with MCI that converted to Alzheimer’s disease dementia (Fig. 1F, β  =  4.62, P = 0.0095), but there was no difference over time depending on whether they converted to Alzheimer’s disease dementia or not (P = 0.78). The total number of observations available for plasma NfL was lower than for plasma p-tau217 (n = 660 versus n = 707). To ensure comparability between the NfL and p-tau217 results, we did a sensitivity analysis for p-tau217 restricted to samples where matching plasma NfL data were available. The results for p-tau217 were similar to the main analysis in this restricted set, both for amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired versus amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired (time × amyloid-β-interaction: β  =  0.34, P < 0.001), amyloid-β− MCI versus amyloid-β+ MCI (time × amyloid-β-interaction: β  =  0.69, P < 0.001), and MCI to Alzheimer’s disease dementia converters versus the remaining MCI group (time × Alzheimer’s disease conversion interaction: β  =  0.82, P < 0.001).

Power analyses to detect changes in plasma p-tau217

Power analyses showed that 109 participants per arm [interquartile range (IQR: 18, 282) would be required for 80% power to observe a reduction in slope for p-tau217 in amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired down to amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired levels, while 71 participants per arm (IQR: 53, 96) would be required for 80% power to see a reduction in slope in amyloid-β+ MCI down to amyloid-β− MCI levels.

Longitudinal plasma p-tau217 and longitudinal cognition

We next tested associations between longitudinal plasma p-tau217 and longitudinal cognition (Fig. 2). Longitudinal increases in p-tau217 correlated with worsening cognition in both cognitively unimpaired and MCI, and also within the subgroups of amyloid-β+ participants. For each standard deviation higher slope of p-tau217, the decline in MMSE accelerated by β = −0.15 points (P < 0.001) in the overall cognitively unimpaired group (Fig. 2A), β = −0.13 points (P = 0.007) in the amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired group (Fig. 2B), β = −0.35 points (P < 0.001) in the overall MCI group (Fig. 2C), and β = −0.21 points (P = 0.004) per year in the amyloid-β+ MCI group (Fig. 2D). Corresponding accelerations in mPACC were β = −0.0048 points (P < 0.001) in the overall cognitively unimpaired group (Fig. 2E), β = −0.041 points (P = 0.0245) in the amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired group (Fig. 2F), β = −0.11 points (P < 0.001) in the overall MCI group (Fig. 2G), and β = −0.076 points (P = 0.0074) in the amyloid-β+ MCI group (Fig. 2H).
Figure 2

Longitudinal cognition by longitudinal plasma p-tau217. Subject-specific cognitive data are shown for (A) MMSE in all cognitively unimpaired (CU), (B) amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (C) all MCI, (D) amyloid-β+ MCI, €and mPACC in all cognitively unimpaired, (F) amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (G) all MCI, and (H) amyloid-β+ MCI. The x-axes show time from first plasma p-tau217 sample. Model trajectories are shown for different longitudinal plasma p-tau217 slopes (the mean slope and the mean ±2 SD), when adjusted for age, sex and education. Longitudinal p-tau217 correlated to longitudinal cognition in all models (see main text and P-values). At the mean p-tau217 slope level, the overall cognitively unimpaired group declined in MMSE and mPACC with β = −0.16 and β = −0.0064, respectively; the amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired group declined in MMSE and mPACC with β = −0.32 and β = −0.12, respectively; the overall MCI group declined in MMSE and mPACC with β = −1.28 and β = −0.23, respectively; and the amyloid-β+ MCI group declined in MMSE and mPACC with β = −1.58, and β = −0.29, respectively (all P < 0.001). Aβ = amyloid-β.

Longitudinal cognition by longitudinal plasma p-tau217. Subject-specific cognitive data are shown for (A) MMSE in all cognitively unimpaired (CU), (B) amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (C) all MCI, (D) amyloid-β+ MCI, €and mPACC in all cognitively unimpaired, (F) amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (G) all MCI, and (H) amyloid-β+ MCI. The x-axes show time from first plasma p-tau217 sample. Model trajectories are shown for different longitudinal plasma p-tau217 slopes (the mean slope and the mean ±2 SD), when adjusted for age, sex and education. Longitudinal p-tau217 correlated to longitudinal cognition in all models (see main text and P-values). At the mean p-tau217 slope level, the overall cognitively unimpaired group declined in MMSE and mPACC with β = −0.16 and β = −0.0064, respectively; the amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired group declined in MMSE and mPACC with β = −0.32 and β = −0.12, respectively; the overall MCI group declined in MMSE and mPACC with β = −1.28 and β = −0.23, respectively; and the amyloid-β+ MCI group declined in MMSE and mPACC with β = −1.58, and β = −0.29, respectively (all P < 0.001). Aβ = amyloid-β.

Longitudinal plasma p-tau217 and longitudinal atrophy

Finally, we tested associations between longitudinal plasma p-tau217 and longitudinal atrophy (Fig. 3). Longitudinally increased p-tau217 correlated with accelerated atrophy of temporal cortex and hippocampus in the amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired, amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, and in the overall MCI group. For each standard deviation higher slope of p-tau217 the thinning of temporal cortex accelerated by β = −0.0057 mm (P < 0.001) per year in the overall cognitively unimpaired group (Fig. 3A), β = −0.0077 mm (P < 0.001) in the amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired group (Fig. 3B) and β = −0.0068 mm (P < 0.001) in the overall MCI group (Fig. 3C). The association in the amyloid-β+ MCI group was non-significant (Fig. 3D, β = −0.0031 mm, P = 0.16). Corresponding accelerations in atrophy of hippocampus were β = −7.56 mm3 (P < 0.001) per year in the overall cognitively unimpaired group (Fig. 3E), β = −11.8 mm3 (P < 0.001) in the amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired group (Fig. 3F), and β = −12.0 mm3 (P < 0.001) in the overall MCI group (Fig. 3G). The association in the amyloid-β+ MCI group was not statistically significant (Fig. 3H, β = −0.76 mm3, P = 0.72).
Figure 3

Longitudinal brain structure by longitudinal plasma p-tau217. Subject-specific MRI data are shown for (A) temporal cortex thickness in all cognitively unimpaired (CU), (B) amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (C) all MCI, (D) amyloid-β+ MCI, and (E) hippocampal volume in all cognitively unimpaired, (F) amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (G) all MCI, and (H) amyloid-β+ MCI. The x-axes show time from first plasma p-tau217 sample. Model trajectories are shown for different longitudinal plasma p-tau217 slopes (the mean slope and the mean ±2 SD), when adjusted for age, sex and (for hippocampal volume) intracranial volume. Longitudinal p-tau217 correlated to longitudinal atrophy in all models except for in amyloid-β+ MCI (see main text and P-values). At the mean p-tau217 slope level, the overall cognitively unimpaired group declined in temporal cortex thickness and hippocampal volume with β = −0.017 and β = −41.0, respectively; the amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired group declined in temporal cortex thickness and hippocampal volume with β = −0.027 and β = −53.3, respectively; the overall MCI group declined in temporal cortex thickness and hippocampal volume with β = −0.047 and β = −82.2, respectively; and the amyloid-β+ MCI group declined in temporal cortex thickness and hippocampal volume with β = −0.055 and β = −93.4, respectively (all P < 0.001).

Longitudinal brain structure by longitudinal plasma p-tau217. Subject-specific MRI data are shown for (A) temporal cortex thickness in all cognitively unimpaired (CU), (B) amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (C) all MCI, (D) amyloid-β+ MCI, and (E) hippocampal volume in all cognitively unimpaired, (F) amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired, (G) all MCI, and (H) amyloid-β+ MCI. The x-axes show time from first plasma p-tau217 sample. Model trajectories are shown for different longitudinal plasma p-tau217 slopes (the mean slope and the mean ±2 SD), when adjusted for age, sex and (for hippocampal volume) intracranial volume. Longitudinal p-tau217 correlated to longitudinal atrophy in all models except for in amyloid-β+ MCI (see main text and P-values). At the mean p-tau217 slope level, the overall cognitively unimpaired group declined in temporal cortex thickness and hippocampal volume with β = −0.017 and β = −41.0, respectively; the amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired group declined in temporal cortex thickness and hippocampal volume with β = −0.027 and β = −53.3, respectively; the overall MCI group declined in temporal cortex thickness and hippocampal volume with β = −0.047 and β = −82.2, respectively; and the amyloid-β+ MCI group declined in temporal cortex thickness and hippocampal volume with β = −0.055 and β = −93.4, respectively (all P < 0.001).

Discussion

Plasma p-tau217 increased over time in the preclinical (amyloid-β+ cognitively unimpaired) and early clinical stages (amyloid-β+ MCI and MCI to Alzheimer’s disease converters) of Alzheimer’s disease, but remained stable in the control groups, i.e. amyloid-β− cognitively unimpaired, amyloid-β− MCI, and MCI patients who did not convert to Alzheimer’s disease dementia. The changes were pronounced, giving high power to detect changes in a clinical trial scenario. Plasma NfL, a marker of neurodegeneration, did not show an Alzheimer’s disease-related increase over time in this cohort. The longitudinal changes in plasma p-tau217 correlated to longitudinal changes in cognition and brain atrophy. This was seen for both the overall cognitively unimpaired and MCI groups, as well as in the subgroups of participants with preclinical (for both cognitive and structural measures) and early clinical Alzheimer’s disease (for cognitive measures). Taken together, our results demonstrate that plasma p-tau217 is a dynamic biomarker during early Alzheimer’s disease, which may be useful to monitor disease progression in clinical practice and in drug development, including to evaluate the effects of novel Alzheimer’s disease therapies. The clinically relevant longitudinal changes in plasma p-tau217, which correlate with both cognitive decline and (especially in the preclinical stage of the disease) increased brain atrophy, resemble previous reports of longitudinal changes of p-tau measures in CSF (Donohue ; Falcon ; Koychev ). The fact that these clinically relevant tau-related changes can now be detected in plasma opens new venues of applied research. Already completed clinical trials (e.g. for promising anti-amyloid-β therapies) can be retrospectively tested for effects on plasma p-tau217. Banked longitudinal plasma samples in epidemiological studies can be analysed for p-tau217 to identify factors (e.g. demographic or genetic) that are associated with faster or slower development of tau pathology. Note that since the individual subgroups were relatively small (e.g. n = 49 amyloid-β+ MCI), we may have been underpowered to detect significant correlations between changes in p-tau217 and some other measures (such as associations between changes in p-tau217 and changes in temporal cortex thickness in amyloid-β+ MCI, Fig. 3D). To conclude, plasma p-tau217 levels accelerate over 6 years in preclinical and prodromal stages of Alzheimer’s disease. This can be used for minimally invasive, objective monitoring of disease progression in Alzheimer’s disease.

Funding

Work at the authors’ laboratory at Lund University was supported by the Swedish Research Council, the Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation, The Medical Faculty at Lund University, Region Skåne, the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg foundation, the Strategic Research Area MultiPark (Multidisciplinary Research in Parkinson’s disease) at Lund University, the Swedish Alzheimer Foundation, the Swedish Brain Foundation, the Swedish Medical Association, the Konung Gustaf V: s och Drottning Victorias Frimurarestiftelse, the Bundy Academy, the Skåne University Hospital Foundation, and the Swedish federal government under the ALF agreement. D.M.W. is an Alzheimer’s Association Zenith Fellow. D.M. received support through a Research Fellowship from the German Research Foundation (DFG ME 4858/1-1).

Competing interests

O.H. has acquired research support (for the institution) from Roche, Pfizer, GE Healthcare, Biogen, Eli Lilly and AVID Radiopharmaceuticals. In the past 2 years, he has received consultancy/speaker fees (paid to the institution) from Biogen and Roche. J.L.D. is an employee of Eli Lilly and Company. D.M.W. is an employee of Biogen. All other authors report no competing interests.
  22 in total

1.  Association Between Elevated Brain Amyloid and Subsequent Cognitive Decline Among Cognitively Normal Persons.

Authors:  Michael C Donohue; Reisa A Sperling; Ronald Petersen; Chung-Kai Sun; Michael W Weiner; Paul S Aisen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Association Between Longitudinal Plasma Neurofilament Light and Neurodegeneration in Patients With Alzheimer Disease.

Authors:  Niklas Mattsson; Nicholas C Cullen; Ulf Andreasson; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 18.302

3.  Discriminative Accuracy of Plasma Phospho-tau217 for Alzheimer Disease vs Other Neurodegenerative Disorders.

Authors:  Sebastian Palmqvist; Shorena Janelidze; Yakeel T Quiroz; Henrik Zetterberg; Francisco Lopera; Erik Stomrud; Yi Su; Yinghua Chen; Geidy E Serrano; Antoine Leuzy; Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren; Olof Strandberg; Ruben Smith; Andres Villegas; Diego Sepulveda-Falla; Xiyun Chai; Nicholas K Proctor; Thomas G Beach; Kaj Blennow; Jeffrey L Dage; Eric M Reiman; Oskar Hansson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Longitudinal structural cerebral changes related to core CSF biomarkers in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: A study of two independent datasets.

Authors:  Carles Falcon; Alan Tucholka; Gemma C Monté-Rubio; Raffaele Cacciaglia; Grégory Operto; Lorena Rami; Juan Domingo Gispert; José Luis Molinuevo
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarker trajectories with increasing amyloid deposition in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sebastian Palmqvist; Philip S Insel; Erik Stomrud; Shorena Janelidze; Henrik Zetterberg; Britta Brix; Udo Eichenlaub; Jeffrey L Dage; Xiyun Chai; Kaj Blennow; Niklas Mattsson; Oskar Hansson
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 12.137

6.  High-precision plasma β-amyloid 42/40 predicts current and future brain amyloidosis.

Authors:  Suzanne E Schindler; James G Bollinger; Vitaliy Ovod; Kwasi G Mawuenyega; Yan Li; Brian A Gordon; David M Holtzman; John C Morris; Tammie L S Benzinger; Chengjie Xiong; Anne M Fagan; Randall J Bateman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 11.800

7.  Increased amyloidogenic APP processing in APOE ɛ4-negative individuals with cerebral β-amyloidosis.

Authors:  Niklas Mattsson; Philip S Insel; Sebastian Palmqvist; Erik Stomrud; Danielle van Westen; Lennart Minthon; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Oskar Hansson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau217 performs better than p-tau181 as a biomarker of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Shorena Janelidze; Erik Stomrud; Ruben Smith; Sebastian Palmqvist; Niklas Mattsson; David C Airey; Nicholas K Proctor; Xiyun Chai; Sergey Shcherbinin; John R Sims; Gallen Triana-Baltzer; Clara Theunis; Randy Slemmon; Marc Mercken; Hartmuth Kolb; Jeffrey L Dage; Oskar Hansson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated tau181 in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Elisabeth H Thijssen; Renaud La Joie; Amy Wolf; Amelia Strom; Ping Wang; Leonardo Iaccarino; Viktoriya Bourakova; Yann Cobigo; Hilary Heuer; Salvatore Spina; Lawren VandeVrede; Xiyun Chai; Nicholas K Proctor; David C Airey; Sergey Shcherbinin; Cynthia Duggan Evans; John R Sims; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Anna M Karydas; Charlotte E Teunissen; Joel H Kramer; Lea T Grinberg; William W Seeley; Howie Rosen; Bradley F Boeve; Bruce L Miller; Gil D Rabinovici; Jeffrey L Dage; Julio C Rojas; Adam L Boxer
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Dynamics of plasma biomarkers in Down syndrome: the relative levels of Aβ42 decrease with age, whereas NT1 tau and NfL increase.

Authors:  David Mengel; Wen Liu; Robert J Glynn; Dennis J Selkoe; Andre Strydom; Florence Lai; H Diana Rosas; Amy Torres; Vasiliki Patsiogiannis; Brian Skotko; Dominic M Walsh
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.982

View more
  40 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Oskar Hansson
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Tau proteins in blood as biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and other proteinopathies.

Authors:  Federico Verde
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Plasma phosphorylated tau 217 and phosphorylated tau 181 as biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a retrospective diagnostic performance study.

Authors:  Elisabeth H Thijssen; Renaud La Joie; Amelia Strom; Corrina Fonseca; Leonardo Iaccarino; Amy Wolf; Salvatore Spina; Isabel E Allen; Yann Cobigo; Hilary Heuer; Lawren VandeVrede; Nicholas K Proctor; Argentina Lario Lago; Suzanne Baker; Rajeev Sivasankaran; Agnieszka Kieloch; Arvind Kinhikar; Lili Yu; Marie-Anne Valentin; Andreas Jeromin; Henrik Zetterberg; Oskar Hansson; Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren; Danielle Graham; Kaj Blennow; Joel H Kramer; Lea T Grinberg; William W Seeley; Howard Rosen; Bradley F Boeve; Bruce L Miller; Charlotte E Teunissen; Gil D Rabinovici; Julio C Rojas; Jeffrey L Dage; Adam L Boxer
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Astrocyte biomarker signatures of amyloid-β and tau pathologies in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Eduardo R Zimmer; Pedro Rosa-Neto; Tharick A Pascoal; João Pedro Ferrari-Souza; Pâmela C L Ferreira; Bruna Bellaver; Cécile Tissot; Yi-Ting Wang; Douglas T Leffa; Wagner S Brum; Andréa L Benedet; Nicholas J Ashton; Marco Antônio De Bastiani; Andréia Rocha; Joseph Therriault; Firoza Z Lussier; Mira Chamoun; Stijn Servaes; Gleb Bezgin; Min Su Kang; Jenna Stevenson; Nesrine Rahmouni; Vanessa Pallen; Nina Margherita Poltronetti; William E Klunk; Dana L Tudorascu; Ann D Cohen; Victor L Villemagne; Serge Gauthier; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Diogo O Souza; Thomas K Karikari
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 13.437

Review 5.  The validation status of blood biomarkers of amyloid and phospho-tau assessed with the 5-phase development framework for AD biomarkers.

Authors:  N J Ashton; A Leuzy; T K Karikari; N Mattsson-Carlgren; A Dodich; M Boccardi; J Corre; A Drzezga; A Nordberg; R Ossenkoppele; H Zetterberg; K Blennow; G B Frisoni; V Garibotto; O Hansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Developing the ATX(N) classification for use across the Alzheimer disease continuum.

Authors:  Harald Hampel; Jeffrey Cummings; Kaj Blennow; Peng Gao; Clifford R Jack; Andrea Vergallo
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 44.711

7.  Prediction of differentially expressed microRNAs in blood as potential biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease by meta-analysis and adaptive boosting ensemble learning.

Authors:  Sze Chung Yuen; Xiaonan Liang; Hongmei Zhu; Yongliang Jia; Siu-Wai Leung
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 6.982

8.  Association of plasma P-tau181 with memory decline in non-demented adults.

Authors:  Joseph Therriault; Andrea L Benedet; Tharick A Pascoal; Firoza Z Lussier; Cecile Tissot; Thomas K Karikari; Nicholas J Ashton; Mira Chamoun; Gleb Bezgin; Sulantha Mathotaarachchi; Serge Gauthier; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Pedro Rosa-Neto
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-06-14

Review 9.  Mass spectrometry-based methods for robust measurement of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in biological fluids.

Authors:  Magdalena Korecka; Leslie M Shaw
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 5.546

10.  Tau PET correlates with different Alzheimer's disease-related features compared to CSF and plasma p-tau biomarkers.

Authors:  Rik Ossenkoppele; Juhan Reimand; Ruben Smith; Antoine Leuzy; Olof Strandberg; Sebastian Palmqvist; Erik Stomrud; Henrik Zetterberg; Philip Scheltens; Jeffrey L Dage; Femke Bouwman; Kaj Blennow; Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren; Shorena Janelidze; Oskar Hansson
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 12.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.