Elisabeth H Thijssen1, Renaud La Joie2, Amelia Strom2, Corrina Fonseca2, Leonardo Iaccarino2, Amy Wolf2, Salvatore Spina2, Isabel E Allen3, Yann Cobigo2, Hilary Heuer2, Lawren VandeVrede2, Nicholas K Proctor4, Argentina Lario Lago2, Suzanne Baker5, Rajeev Sivasankaran6, Agnieszka Kieloch6, Arvind Kinhikar6, Lili Yu6, Marie-Anne Valentin6, Andreas Jeromin7, Henrik Zetterberg8, Oskar Hansson9, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren10, Danielle Graham11, Kaj Blennow12, Joel H Kramer2, Lea T Grinberg13, William W Seeley13, Howard Rosen2, Bradley F Boeve14, Bruce L Miller2, Charlotte E Teunissen15, Gil D Rabinovici16, Julio C Rojas2, Jeffrey L Dage4, Adam L Boxer17. 1. Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 2. Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 5. Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. 6. Novartis, Cambridge, MA, USA. 7. Quanterix, Billerica, MA, USA. 8. Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, University College London, London, UK. 9. Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 10. Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 11. Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA. 12. Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden. 13. Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 14. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 15. Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 16. Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 17. Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: adam.boxer@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (p-tau217) and plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181) are associated with Alzheimer's disease tau pathology. We compared the diagnostic value of both biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired participants and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease syndromes, or frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) syndromes. METHODS: In this retrospective multicohort diagnostic performance study, we analysed plasma samples, obtained from patients aged 18-99 years old who had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (Alzheimer's disease dementia, logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia, or posterior cortical atrophy), FTLD syndromes (corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia, or semantic variant primary progressive aphasia), or mild cognitive impairment; the participants were from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Memory and Aging Center, San Francisco, CA, USA, and the Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Consortium (ARTFL; 17 sites in the USA and two in Canada). Participants from both cohorts were carefully characterised, including assessments of CSF p-tau181, amyloid-PET or tau-PET (or both), and clinical and cognitive evaluations. Plasma p-tau181 and p-tau217 were measured using electrochemiluminescence-based assays, which differed only in the biotinylated antibody epitope specificity. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to determine diagnostic accuracy of both plasma markers using clinical diagnosis, neuropathological findings, and amyloid-PET and tau-PET measures as gold standards. Difference between two area under the curve (AUC) analyses were tested with the Delong test. FINDINGS: Data were collected from 593 participants (443 from UCSF and 150 from ARTFL, mean age 64 years [SD 13], 294 [50%] women) between July 1 and Nov 30, 2020. Plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 were correlated (r=0·90, p<0·0001). Both p-tau217 and p-tau181 concentrations were increased in people with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (n=75, mean age 65 years [SD 10]) relative to cognitively unimpaired controls (n=118, mean age 61 years [SD 18]; AUC=0·98 [95% CI 0·95-1·00] for p-tau217, AUC=0·97 [0·94-0·99] for p-tau181; pdiff=0·31) and in pathology-confirmed Alzheimer's disease (n=15, mean age 73 years [SD 12]) versus pathologically confirmed FTLD (n=68, mean age 67 years [SD 8]; AUC=0·96 [0·92-1·00] for p-tau217, AUC=0·91 [0·82-1·00] for p-tau181; pdiff=0·22). P-tau217 outperformed p-tau181 in differentiating patients with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (n=75) from those with FTLD syndromes (n=274, mean age 67 years [SD 9]; AUC=0·93 [0·91-0·96] for p-tau217, AUC=0·91 [0·88-0·94] for p-tau181; pdiff=0·01). P-tau217 was a stronger indicator of amyloid-PET positivity (n=146, AUC=0·91 [0·88-0·94]) than was p-tau181 (n=214, AUC=0·89 [0·86-0·93]; pdiff=0·049). Tau-PET binding in the temporal cortex was more strongly associated with p-tau217 than p-tau181 (r=0·80 vs r=0·72; pdiff<0·0001, n=230). INTERPRETATION: Both p-tau217 and p-tau181 had excellent diagnostic performance for differentiating patients with Alzheimer's disease syndromes from other neurodegenerative disorders. There was some evidence in favour of p-tau217 compared with p-tau181 for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease syndromes versus FTLD syndromes, as an indication of amyloid-PET-positivity, and for stronger correlations with tau-PET signal. Pending replication in independent, diverse, and older cohorts, plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 could be useful screening tools to identify individuals with underlying amyloid and Alzheimer's disease tau pathology. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health, State of California Department of Health Services, Rainwater Charitable Foundation, Michael J Fox foundation, Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration, Alzheimer's Association.
BACKGROUND: Plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (p-tau217) and plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181) are associated with Alzheimer's disease tau pathology. We compared the diagnostic value of both biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired participants and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease syndromes, or frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) syndromes. METHODS: In this retrospective multicohort diagnostic performance study, we analysed plasma samples, obtained from patients aged 18-99 years old who had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (Alzheimer's disease dementia, logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia, or posterior cortical atrophy), FTLD syndromes (corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia, or semantic variant primary progressive aphasia), or mild cognitive impairment; the participants were from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Memory and Aging Center, San Francisco, CA, USA, and the Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Consortium (ARTFL; 17 sites in the USA and two in Canada). Participants from both cohorts were carefully characterised, including assessments of CSF p-tau181, amyloid-PET or tau-PET (or both), and clinical and cognitive evaluations. Plasma p-tau181 and p-tau217 were measured using electrochemiluminescence-based assays, which differed only in the biotinylated antibody epitope specificity. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to determine diagnostic accuracy of both plasma markers using clinical diagnosis, neuropathological findings, and amyloid-PET and tau-PET measures as gold standards. Difference between two area under the curve (AUC) analyses were tested with the Delong test. FINDINGS: Data were collected from 593 participants (443 from UCSF and 150 from ARTFL, mean age 64 years [SD 13], 294 [50%] women) between July 1 and Nov 30, 2020. Plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 were correlated (r=0·90, p<0·0001). Both p-tau217 and p-tau181 concentrations were increased in people with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (n=75, mean age 65 years [SD 10]) relative to cognitively unimpaired controls (n=118, mean age 61 years [SD 18]; AUC=0·98 [95% CI 0·95-1·00] for p-tau217, AUC=0·97 [0·94-0·99] for p-tau181; pdiff=0·31) and in pathology-confirmed Alzheimer's disease (n=15, mean age 73 years [SD 12]) versus pathologically confirmed FTLD (n=68, mean age 67 years [SD 8]; AUC=0·96 [0·92-1·00] for p-tau217, AUC=0·91 [0·82-1·00] for p-tau181; pdiff=0·22). P-tau217 outperformed p-tau181 in differentiating patients with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (n=75) from those with FTLD syndromes (n=274, mean age 67 years [SD 9]; AUC=0·93 [0·91-0·96] for p-tau217, AUC=0·91 [0·88-0·94] for p-tau181; pdiff=0·01). P-tau217 was a stronger indicator of amyloid-PET positivity (n=146, AUC=0·91 [0·88-0·94]) than was p-tau181 (n=214, AUC=0·89 [0·86-0·93]; pdiff=0·049). Tau-PET binding in the temporal cortex was more strongly associated with p-tau217 than p-tau181 (r=0·80 vs r=0·72; pdiff<0·0001, n=230). INTERPRETATION: Both p-tau217 and p-tau181 had excellent diagnostic performance for differentiating patients with Alzheimer's disease syndromes from other neurodegenerative disorders. There was some evidence in favour of p-tau217 compared with p-tau181 for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease syndromes versus FTLD syndromes, as an indication of amyloid-PET-positivity, and for stronger correlations with tau-PET signal. Pending replication in independent, diverse, and older cohorts, plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 could be useful screening tools to identify individuals with underlying amyloid and Alzheimer's disease tau pathology. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health, State of California Department of Health Services, Rainwater Charitable Foundation, Michael J Fox foundation, Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration, Alzheimer's Association.
Authors: Marilyn S Albert; Steven T DeKosky; Dennis Dickson; Bruno Dubois; Howard H Feldman; Nick C Fox; Anthony Gamst; David M Holtzman; William J Jagust; Ronald C Petersen; Peter J Snyder; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: M L Gorno-Tempini; A E Hillis; S Weintraub; A Kertesz; M Mendez; S F Cappa; J M Ogar; J D Rohrer; S Black; B F Boeve; F Manes; N F Dronkers; R Vandenberghe; K Rascovsky; K Patterson; B L Miller; D S Knopman; J R Hodges; M M Mesulam; M Grossman Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Matteo Pardini; Edward D Huey; Salvatore Spina; William C Kreisl; Silvia Morbelli; Eric M Wassermann; Flavio Nobili; Bernardino Ghetti; Jordan Grafman Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ian R A Mackenzie; Manuela Neumann; Atik Baborie; Deepak M Sampathu; Daniel Du Plessis; Evelyn Jaros; Robert H Perry; John Q Trojanowski; David M A Mann; Virginia M Y Lee Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Shorena Janelidze; Niklas Mattsson; Sebastian Palmqvist; Ruben Smith; Thomas G Beach; Geidy E Serrano; Xiyun Chai; Nicholas K Proctor; Udo Eichenlaub; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Eric M Reiman; Erik Stomrud; Jeffrey L Dage; Oskar Hansson Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Elisabeth H Thijssen; Renaud La Joie; Amy Wolf; Amelia Strom; Ping Wang; Leonardo Iaccarino; Viktoriya Bourakova; Yann Cobigo; Hilary Heuer; Salvatore Spina; Lawren VandeVrede; Xiyun Chai; Nicholas K Proctor; David C Airey; Sergey Shcherbinin; Cynthia Duggan Evans; John R Sims; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Anna M Karydas; Charlotte E Teunissen; Joel H Kramer; Lea T Grinberg; William W Seeley; Howie Rosen; Bradley F Boeve; Bruce L Miller; Gil D Rabinovici; Jeffrey L Dage; Julio C Rojas; Adam L Boxer Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Adam M Brickman; Jennifer J Manly; Lawrence S Honig; Danurys Sanchez; Dolly Reyes-Dumeyer; Rafael A Lantigua; Patrick J Lao; Yaakov Stern; Jean Paul Vonsattel; Andrew F Teich; David C Airey; Nicholas Kyle Proctor; Jeffrey L Dage; Richard Mayeux Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-02-13 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Thomas K Karikari; Nicholas J Ashton; Gunnar Brinkmalm; Wagner S Brum; Andréa L Benedet; Laia Montoliu-Gaya; Juan Lantero-Rodriguez; Tharick Ali Pascoal; Marc Suárez-Calvet; Pedro Rosa-Neto; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 44.711
Authors: Jennifer A Frontera; Allal Boutajangout; Arjun V Masurkar; Rebecca A Betensky; Yulin Ge; Alok Vedvyas; Ludovic Debure; Andre Moreira; Ariane Lewis; Joshua Huang; Sujata Thawani; Laura Balcer; Steven Galetta; Thomas Wisniewski Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 16.655