Michael C Donohue1, Reisa A Sperling2, Ronald Petersen3, Chung-Kai Sun1, Michael W Weiner4, Paul S Aisen1. 1. Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, San Diego. 2. Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts3Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts4Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 3. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of California-San Francisco7San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
Importance: Among cognitively normal individuals, elevated brain amyloid (defined by cerebrospinal fluid assays or positron emission tomography regional summaries) can be related to risk for later Alzheimer-related cognitive decline. Objective: To characterize and quantify the risk for Alzheimer-related cognitive decline among cognitively normal individuals with elevated brain amyloid. Design, Setting, and Participants: Exploratory analyses were conducted with longitudinal cognitive and biomarker data from 445 cognitively normal individuals in the United States and Canada. Participants were observed from August 23, 2005, to June 7, 2016, for a median of 3.1 years (interquartile range, 2.0-4.2 years; maximum follow-up, 10.3 years) as part of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Exposures: Individuals were classified at baseline as having normal (n = 243) or elevated (n = 202) brain amyloid using positron emission tomography amyloid imaging or a cerebrospinal fluid assay of amyloid β. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included scores on the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC; a sum of 4 baseline standardized z scores, which decreases with worse performance), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; 0 [worst] to 30 [best] points), Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-Sum of Boxes; 0 [best] to 18 [worst] points), and Logical Memory Delayed Recall (0 [worst] to 25 [best] story units). Results: Among the 445 participants (243 with normal amyloid, 202 with elevated amyloid), mean (SD) age was 74.0 (5.9) years, mean education was 16.4 (2.7) years, and 52% were women. The mean score for PACC at baseline was 0.00 (2.60); for MMSE, 29.0 (1.2); for CDR-Sum of Boxes, 0.04 (0.14); and for Logical Memory Delayed Recall, 13.1 (3.3). Compared with the group with normal amyloid, those with elevated amyloid had worse mean scores at 4 years on the PACC (mean difference, 1.51 points [95% CI, 0.94-2.10]; P < .001), MMSE (mean difference, 0.56 points [95% CI, 0.32-0.80]; P < .001), and CDR-Sum of Boxes (mean difference, 0.23 points [95% CI, 0.08-0.38]; P = .002). For Logical Memory Delayed Recall, between-group score was not statistically significant at 4 years (mean difference, 0.73 story units [95% CI, -0.02 to 1.48]; P = .056). Conclusions and Relevance: Exploratory analyses of a cognitively normal cohort followed up for a median of 3.1 years suggest that elevation in baseline brain amyloid level, compared with normal brain amyloid level, was associated with higher likelihood of cognitive decline, although the findings are of uncertain clinical significance. Further research is needed to assess the clinical importance of these differences and measure longer-term associations.
Importance: Among cognitively normal individuals, elevated brain amyloid (defined by cerebrospinal fluid assays or positron emission tomography regional summaries) can be related to risk for later Alzheimer-related cognitive decline. Objective: To characterize and quantify the risk for Alzheimer-related cognitive decline among cognitively normal individuals with elevated brain amyloid. Design, Setting, and Participants: Exploratory analyses were conducted with longitudinal cognitive and biomarker data from 445 cognitively normal individuals in the United States and Canada. Participants were observed from August 23, 2005, to June 7, 2016, for a median of 3.1 years (interquartile range, 2.0-4.2 years; maximum follow-up, 10.3 years) as part of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Exposures: Individuals were classified at baseline as having normal (n = 243) or elevated (n = 202) brain amyloid using positron emission tomography amyloid imaging or a cerebrospinal fluid assay of amyloid β. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included scores on the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC; a sum of 4 baseline standardized z scores, which decreases with worse performance), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; 0 [worst] to 30 [best] points), Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-Sum of Boxes; 0 [best] to 18 [worst] points), and Logical Memory Delayed Recall (0 [worst] to 25 [best] story units). Results: Among the 445 participants (243 with normal amyloid, 202 with elevated amyloid), mean (SD) age was 74.0 (5.9) years, mean education was 16.4 (2.7) years, and 52% were women. The mean score for PACC at baseline was 0.00 (2.60); for MMSE, 29.0 (1.2); for CDR-Sum of Boxes, 0.04 (0.14); and for Logical Memory Delayed Recall, 13.1 (3.3). Compared with the group with normal amyloid, those with elevated amyloid had worse mean scores at 4 years on the PACC (mean difference, 1.51 points [95% CI, 0.94-2.10]; P < .001), MMSE (mean difference, 0.56 points [95% CI, 0.32-0.80]; P < .001), and CDR-Sum of Boxes (mean difference, 0.23 points [95% CI, 0.08-0.38]; P = .002). For Logical Memory Delayed Recall, between-group score was not statistically significant at 4 years (mean difference, 0.73 story units [95% CI, -0.02 to 1.48]; P = .056). Conclusions and Relevance: Exploratory analyses of a cognitively normal cohort followed up for a median of 3.1 years suggest that elevation in baseline brain amyloid level, compared with normal brain amyloid level, was associated with higher likelihood of cognitive decline, although the findings are of uncertain clinical significance. Further research is needed to assess the clinical importance of these differences and measure longer-term associations.
Authors: Stephanie Jb Vos; Chengjie Xiong; Pieter Jelle Visser; Mateusz S Jasielec; Jason Hassenstab; Elizabeth A Grant; Nigel J Cairns; John C Morris; David M Holtzman; Anne M Fagan Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Susan M Landau; Christopher Breault; Abhinay D Joshi; Michael Pontecorvo; Chester A Mathis; William J Jagust; Mark A Mintun Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Thorlakur Jonsson; Jasvinder K Atwal; Stacy Steinberg; Jon Snaedal; Palmi V Jonsson; Sigurbjorn Bjornsson; Hreinn Stefansson; Patrick Sulem; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Janice Maloney; Kwame Hoyte; Amy Gustafson; Yichin Liu; Yanmei Lu; Tushar Bhangale; Robert R Graham; Johanna Huttenlocher; Gyda Bjornsdottir; Ole A Andreassen; Erik G Jönsson; Aarno Palotie; Timothy W Behrens; Olafur T Magnusson; Augustine Kong; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Ryan J Watts; Kari Stefansson Journal: Nature Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: L Davies; B Wolska; C Hilbich; G Multhaup; R Martins; G Simms; K Beyreuther; C L Masters Journal: Neurology Date: 1988-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Philip S Insel; Michael C Donohue; R Scott Mackin; Paul S Aisen; Oskar Hansson; Michael W Weiner; Niklas Mattsson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Arno de Wilde; Wiesje M van der Flier; Wiesje Pelkmans; Femke Bouwman; Jurre Verwer; Colin Groot; Marieke M van Buchem; Marissa Zwan; Rik Ossenkoppele; Maqsood Yaqub; Marleen Kunneman; Ellen M A Smets; Frederik Barkhof; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Andrew Stephens; Erik van Lier; Geert Jan Biessels; Bart N van Berckel; Philip Scheltens Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Rachel F Buckley; Elizabeth C Mormino; Rebecca E Amariglio; Michael J Properzi; Jennifer S Rabin; Yen Ying Lim; Kathryn V Papp; Heidi I L Jacobs; Samantha Burnham; Bernard J Hanseeuw; Vincent Doré; Annette Dobson; Colin L Masters; Michael Waller; Christopher C Rowe; Paul Maruff; Michael C Donohue; Dorene M Rentz; Dylan Kirn; Trey Hedden; Jasmeer Chhatwal; Aaron P Schultz; Keith A Johnson; Victor L Villemagne; Reisa A Sperling Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Catherine M Roe; Beau M Ances; Denise Head; Ganesh M Babulal; Sarah H Stout; Elizabeth A Grant; Jason Hassenstab; Chengjie Xiong; David M Holtzman; Tammie L S Benzinger; Suzanne E Schindler; Anne M Fagan; John C Morris Journal: Brain Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jeremy A Elman; Matthew S Panizzon; Daniel E Gustavson; Carol E Franz; Mark E Sanderson-Cimino; Michael J Lyons; William S Kremen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Kimberly D Mueller; Rebecca L Koscik; Lianlian Du; Davide Bruno; Erin M Jonaitis; Audra Z Koscik; Bradley T Christian; Tobey J Betthauser; Nathaniel A Chin; Bruce P Hermann; Sterling C Johnson Journal: Cortex Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 4.027
Authors: Murat Bilgel; Yang An; Jessica Helphrey; Wendy Elkins; Gabriela Gomez; Dean F Wong; Christos Davatzikos; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan M Resnick Journal: Brain Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 13.501