| Literature DB >> 33066194 |
Atsushi Ueda1, Mei Higuchi1, Kazuki Sato1, Tomohiro Umeno1, Masakazu Tanaka1.
Abstract
We designed and synthesized helical short oligopeptides with an L-proline on the N-terminus and hydrocarbon stapling on the side chain. Side-chain stapling is a frequently used method for the development of biologically active peptides. Side-chain stapling can stabilize the secondary structures of peptides, and, therefore, stapled peptides may be applicable to peptide-based organocatalysts. Olefin-tethered cis-4-hydroxy-L-proline 1 and L-serine 2 and 8, and (R)-α-allyl-proline 18 were used as cross-linking motifs and incorporated into helical peptide sequences. The Z- and E-selectivities were observed for the ring-closing metathesis reactions of peptides 3 and 11 (i,i+1 series), respectively, while no E/Z-selectivity was observed for that of 19 (i,i+3 series). The stapled peptide B' catalyzed the Michael addition reaction of 1-methylindole to α,β-unsaturated aldehyde, which was seven times faster than that of unstapled peptide B. Furthermore, the high catalytic activity was retained even at lower catalyst loadings (5 mol %) and lower temperatures (0 °C). The circular dichroism spectra of stapled peptide B' showed a right-handed helix with a higher intensity than that of unstapled peptide B. These results indicate that the introduction of side-chain stapling is beneficial for enhancing the catalytic activity of short oligopeptide catalysts.Entities:
Keywords: L-proline; Michael addition; helix; hydrocarbon stapling; organocatalyst; peptide; ring-closing metathesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33066194 PMCID: PMC7594088 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25204667
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Hydrocarbon-stapled peptides used in the organocatalytic reaction. (a) Helical peptide-based primary amino catalyst with stapling at i,i+4 and (b) helical peptide-based secondary amino catalysts with stapling at i,i+1 and i,i+3 (This work).
Scheme 1Synthesis of unstapled peptides A and B and stapled peptides A’ and B’ (tethering at i, i+1 positions with a 13-membered ring).
Scheme 2Synthesis of unstapled peptide C and stapled peptide C’ (tethering at i, i+1 positions with a 15-membered ring).
Scheme 3Synthesis of unstapled peptide D and stapled peptide D’ (tethering at i, i+3 positions with an 18-membered ring).
Catalytic activities of unstapled peptides A–D and stapled peptides A’–D’ in the Michael addition reaction of 21 and 22.
| Entry | Peptide | Time (d) | Conv. (%) 1 | Ee (%) 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 6 | 27 | −1 |
| 2 |
| 6 | 46 | 6 |
| 3 |
| 1 | 12 | −29 |
| 4 |
| 1 | 83 | 36 |
| 5 |
| 4 | 51 | −11 |
| 6 |
| 4 | 81 | −5 |
| 7 |
| 2 | 50 | −47 |
| 8 |
| 2 | 69 | −56 |
| 9 |
| 1 | 9 | N.D. 3 |
1 Conversion was determined by 1H NMR analysis. 2 Ee was determined by HPLC. 3 Not determined.
Effect of the catalyst loading and temperature in the Michael addition reaction.
| Entry | Peptide (mol %) | Temp. (°C) | Conv. (%) 1 | Ee (%) 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rt 3 | 12 | −29 | |
| 2 | rt 3 | 83 | 36 | |
| 3 | rt 3 | 6 | −13 | |
| 4 | rt 3 | 81 | 36 | |
| 5 | rt 3 | trace | N.D. 4 | |
| 6 | rt 3 | 66 | 30 | |
| 7 | 0 | trace | N.D. 4 | |
| 8 | 0 | 78 | 47 |
1 Conversion was determined by 1H NMR analysis. 2 Ee was determined by HPLC. 3 Room temperature. 4 Not determined.
Figure 2Circular dichroism (CD) spectra of peptide catalysts A–D and A’–D’. (0.5 mM in 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol).
Figure 3A plausible reaction mechanism catalyzed by (a) stapled peptide B’ and (b) unstapled peptide B.