| Literature DB >> 33057359 |
Natalia Siwińska1, Urszula Pasławska1,2, Remigiusz Bąchor3, Barbara Szczepankiewicz1, Agnieszka Żak1, Paulina Grocholska3, Zbigniew Szewczuk3.
Abstract
No sensitive method for diagnosing early kidney dysfunction in horses has been identified so far. Many studies carried out in humans and small animals show that podocin can be useful to diagnose various kidney diseases, mainly affecting the glomeruli. The aim of this study was to perform a qualitative and quantitative analysis of podocin in urine samples obtained from healthy horses, horses with clinical kidney dysfunction and horses at risk of acute kidney injury. The study objectives aimed to assess: (1) whether the selected podocin tryptic peptide for LC-MS-MRM allows for podocin detection in horse; and (2) whether the species-specific ELISA test makes this detection possible as well;, (3) whether the chosen methods are sensitive enough to detect kidney dysfunction and glomerular injury, (4) whether the results of the tests applying both methods correspond with one another, (5) whether the results correlate with the hematological and biochemical data. The signals that may indicate the presence of trypsin fragments of podocin were found in three healthy horses, all the horses diagnosed with kidney dysfunction and half of the animals at risk for acute kidney injury. The concentration of podocin, diagnosed with the ELISA test was as follows: from 0.19 to 1.2 ng/ml in healthy animals, from 0.19 to 20.0 ng/ml in AKI horses, from 0.29 to 5.71 ng/ml in horses at risk for acute kidney injury. The results of both methods corresponded significantly. Podocin may be a potential biomarker of clinical kidney disease in horses and may be used in the detection of glomerular injury. However, its use is limited by the possibility of physiological podocyturia. LC-MS-MRM seems to be a more sensitive method to evaluate the presence of podocin than the ELISA test, whilst selected tryptic peptides of podocin appear to apply to horses. The ELISA test showed greater effectiveness in excluding the disease than in confirming it.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33057359 PMCID: PMC7561189 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Hematological and biochemical blood results of healthy horses, horses with clinical kidney dysfunction (horses with AKI) and horses at risk for acute kidney injury.
| Parameter | Healthy horses (n = 30) | Horses with AKI (n = 10) | Horses at risk for AKI (n = 30) | P Value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Me | Q3 | Q1 | Me | Q3 | Q1 | Me | Q3 | ||
| 7.0 | 7.4 | 7.7 | 6.5 | 7.2 | 8.8 | 6.5 | 7.1 | 8.4 | NS | |
| 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.37 | 0.43 | NS | |
| 7.5 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 5.9 | 7.6 | 9.0 | 5.9 | 7.2 | 8.3 | NS | |
| 5.9 | 6.8 | 8.8 | 8.0 | 9.3 | 15.6 | 7.2 | 7.9 | 9.1 | NS | |
| 4.6 | 5.7 | 6.3 | 10.6 | 12.3 | 23.9 | 5.3 | 5.7 | 6.4 | <0.0001 | |
| 93.0 | 120.0 | 137.0 | 228.0 | 305.0 | 440.2 | 103.8 | 129.0 | 136.9 | <0.0001 | |
| 264.0 | 283.0 | 321.0 | 244.0 | 416.7 | 501.5 | 247.0 | 300.5 | 342.7 | NS | |
| 10.0 | 12.0 | 16.0 | 16.5 | 23.5 | 44.0 | 9.0 | 14.0 | 21.6 | 0.04 | |
| 172.0 | 201.0 | 262.0 | 185.5 | 204.0 | 375.0 | 140.6 | 184.5 | 224.3 | NS | |
| 196.0 | 227.0 | 311.0 | 186.5 | 221.0 | 313.5 | 182.0 | 224.0 | 285.0 | NS | |
| 59.0 | 63.0 | 70.0 | 54.7 | 62.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 61.0 | 64.2 | NS | |
| 31.0 | 32.0 | 34.0 | 20.4 | 28.0 | 36.5 | 24.0 | 30.0 | 33.8 | NS | |
| 3.8 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 5.6 | 6.4 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 5.5 | 0.03 | |
| 134.0 | 135.8 | 136.8 | 129.1 | 134.0 | 137.5 | 131.0 | 133.9 | 136.8 | NS | |
| 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.4 | NS | |
| 98.4 | 99.0 | 100.4 | 86.5 | 96.0 | 99.7 | 98.8 | 100.0 | 101.7 | 0.02 | |
| 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.78 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.8 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.74 | NS | |
| 2.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 3.1 | NS | |
| 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.96 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.06 | 1.3 | NS | |
Note: AKI–acute kidney injury; Q1 –quartile 1; Me–median; Q3 –quartile 3; HGB—hemoglobin; HCT—hematocrit; RBC–red blood cell count; WBC–white blood cell count; AST–aspartate aminotransferase; GGT–gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; AP–alkaline phosphatase; CK–creatine kinase; NS–statistically insignificant.
*—p<0.05 for healthy horses and AKI horses.
^—p<0.05 for healthy horses and horses at risk for AKI
#—p<0.05 for AKI horses and horses at risk for AKI.
Urine biochemistry results of healthy horses, horses with clinical kidney dysfunction (horses with AKI) and horses at risk for acute kidney injury.
| Parameter | Healthy horses (n = 30) | Horses with AKI (n = 10) | Horses at risk for AKI (n = 30) | P Value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Me | Q3 | Q1 | Me | Q3 | Q1 | Me | Q3 | ||
| 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.4 | 5.45 | 6 | 7.95 | 7.8 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 0.001 | |
| 1.021 | 1.031 | 1.042 | 1.011 | 1.013 | 1.0225 | 1.02 | 1.033 | 1.036 | NS | |
| 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.375 | 0.69 | 1.24 | 0.13 | 0.205 | 0.315 | <0.0001 | |
| 13.9 | 20.9 | 33.8 | 3.5 | 9.1 | 15.0 | 12.7 | 17.1 | 22.5 | NS | |
| 0.014 | 0.023 | 0.04 | 0.35 | 0.65 | 3.1 | 0.075 | 0.095 | 0.16 | <0.0001 | |
| 18.0 | 21.0 | 20.5 | 22.0 | 20.5 | 23.0 | 19.3 | 25 | 32 | NS | |
| 0.74 | 1.07 | 1.52 | 1.62 | 4.55 | 7.19 | 1.22 | 1.44 | 1.97 | <0.05 | |
| 15.6 | 20.2 | 24.3 | 26.9 | 28.9 | 56.6 | 13.5 | 23.8 | 40.7 | NS | |
| 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.44 | 1.95 | 5.80 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.17 | <0.005 | |
Note: AKI–acute kidney injury; Q1 –quartile 1; Me–median; Q3 –quartile 3; UPC—urine protein creatinine ratio; GGT–Gamma-glutamyl transferase; Crea–creatinine; FENa—Fractional sodium excretion; NS–statistically insignificant.
*—p<0.05 for healthy horses and AKI horses.
^—p<0.05 for healthy horses and horses at risk for AKI
#—p<0.05 for AKI horses and horses at risk for AKI.
Fig 1The sequence of horse podocin with marked trypsin cleavage sites determined according to the UniProt databases (entry name F6WST7_HORSE).
The selected sequences are underlined.
Fig 2MRM analysis of the urine sediment tryptic digest sample which does not contain podocin.
The peaks characteristic for the transitions of the analyzed tryptic podocin peptide were not identified.
Fig 3MRM chromatograms representing transitions corresponding to the model peptide with the 169H-LQTLEIPFHEIVTK-OH182 sequence identified in the tryptic digest of an equine urine sediment sample from animal with diagnosed AKI.
Fig 4MRM chromatograms representing transitions corresponding to the model peptide with the H-LQTLEIPFHEIVTK(TPP)-OH sequence identified in the tryptic digest of an equine urine sediment sample from animal with diagnosed AKI.
Results of the podocin concentration based on the quantitative ELISA test in healthy horses, horses with clinical kidney dysfunction (horses with AKI) and horses at risk for acute kidney injury.
| Healthy horses | Horses with AKI | Horses at risk for AKI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min.–max. | Me (Q1 –Q3) | Min.–max. | Me (Q1 –Q3) | Min.–max. | Me (Q1 –Q3) | P Value | |
| 0.19–1.2 | 0.428 (0.312–0.618) | 0.19–20.0 | 1.053 (0.714–7.775) | 0.29–5.71 | 0.658 (0.317–1.004) | 0.01 | |
Note: AKI–acute kidney injury; Q1 –quartile 1; Me–median; Q3 –quartile 3
*—p<0.05 for healthy horses and AKI horses.
Fig 5Graph showing results of the quantitative podocin ELISA test in healthy horses, horses with clinical kidney dysfunction and horses at risk for acute kidney injury.
The ROC analysis of podocin relative to the kidney disease in horses.
| Cut-off value | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.38 | 0.94 | 0.73 |
Note
*AUC—area under the ROC.
Fig 6The ROC analysis curve, showing sensitivity and specificity for podocin ELISA test.
Total number of positive, negative and uncertain results in the quantitative (ELISA) and qualitative (LC-MS-MRM) podocin evaluation in all the examined horses.
| Qualitative method (LC-MS-MRM) | Quantitative method (ELISA) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Negative | Positive | Negative | Equivocal | Positive |
| Number | 42 | 29 | 50 | 1 | 20 |
Comparison of compatibility of obtained result categories between the qualitative and quantitative method.
| Qualitative method (LC-MS-MRM) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | Total | ||
| Negative | 41 | 9 | 50 | |
| Equivocal | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Positive | 1 | 19 | 20 | |
| Total | 42 | 29 | 71 | |
Note: For ELISA test: negative < 0.81, equivocal = 0.81, positive > 0.81.