Literature DB >> 12352932

Comparison of an ELISA and an LC/MS/MS method for measuring tacrolimus concentrations and making dosage decisions in transplant recipients.

Christine E Staatz1, Paul J Taylor, Susan E Tett.   

Abstract

This study compared an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) technique for measurement of tacrolimus concentrations in adult kidney and liver transplant recipients, and investigated how assay choice influenced pharmacokinetic parameter estimates and drug dosage decisions. Tacrolimus concentrations measured by both ELISA and LC/MS/MS from 29 kidney (n = 98 samples) and 27 liver (n = 97 samples) transplant recipients were used to evaluate the performance of these methods in the clinical setting. Tacrolimus concentrations measured by the two techniques were compared via regression analysis. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed independently using ELISA and LC/MS/MS data from 76 kidney recipients. Derived kinetic parameters were used to formulate "typical dosing" regimens for concentration targeting. Dosage recommendations for the two assays were compared. The relation between LC/MS/MS and ELISA measurements was best described by the regression equation ELISA = 1.02. (LC/MS/MS) + 0.14 in kidney recipients, and ELISA = 1.12. (LC/MS/MS) - 0.87 in liver recipients. ELISA displayed less accuracy than LC/MS/MS at lower tacrolimus concentrations. Population pharmacokinetic models based on ELISA and LC/MS/MS data were similar with residual random errors of 4.1 ng/mL and 3.7 ng/mL, respectively. Assay choice gave rise to dosage prediction differences ranging from 0% to 30%. ELISA measurements of tacrolimus are not automatically interchangeable with LC/MS/MS values. Assay differences were greatest in adult liver recipients, probably reflecting periods of liver dysfunction and impaired biliary secretion of metabolites. While the majority of data collected in this study suggested assay differences in adult kidney recipients were minimal, findings of ELISA dosage underpredictions of up to 25% in the long term must be investigated further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12352932     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-200210000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic Analysis of a Novel Human EGFRvIII:CD3 Bispecific Antibody in Plasma and Whole Blood Using a High-Resolution Targeted Mass Spectrometry Approach.

Authors:  Teilo H Schaller; Matthew W Foster; J Will Thompson; Ivan Spasojevic; Deimante Normantaite; M Arthur Moseley; Luis Sanchez-Perez; John H Sampson
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Pharmacokinetics of a Transdermal Fentanyl Solution in Suffolk Sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Kimberly Y Jen; Melissa C Dyson; Patrick A Lester; Jean A Nemzek
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Milk transfer and neonatal safety of tacrolimus.

Authors:  Amy E French; Steven J Soldin; Offie P Soldin; Gideon Koren
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Toward a robust tool for pharmacokinetic-based personalization of treatment with tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation: A model-based meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  Tom M Nanga; Thao T P Doan; Pierre Marquet; Flora T Musuamba
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Clinical aspects of tacrolimus use in paediatric renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Agnieszka Prytuła; Teun van Gelder
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Response to Tsikas et al. Comments on Boelaert et al. Determination of Asymmetric and Symmetric Dimethylarginine in Serum from Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: UPLC-MS/MS versus ELISA. Toxins 2016, 8, 149.

Authors:  Jente Boelaert; Eva Schepers; Griet Glorieux; Sunny Eloot; Raymond Vanholder; Frédéric Lynen
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  Evaluation of podocin in urine in horses using qualitative and quantitative methods.

Authors:  Natalia Siwińska; Urszula Pasławska; Remigiusz Bąchor; Barbara Szczepankiewicz; Agnieszka Żak; Paulina Grocholska; Zbigniew Szewczuk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.