| Literature DB >> 34250311 |
Natalia Siwińska1, Agnieszka Żak2, Urszula Pasławska1,3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) in horses is difficult at the subclinical stage, due to nonspecific clinical signs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concentrations of selected serum and urinary biomarkers in healthy horses, horses at risk of AKI, and those with clinical AKI.Entities:
Keywords: NGAL; NSAIDs; acute kidney injury; cystatin C; nephrotoxicity
Year: 2021 PMID: 34250311 PMCID: PMC8256477 DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2021-0025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Res ISSN: 2450-7393 Impact factor: 1.744
Fig. 1Results of serum (S) and urinary (U) neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in healthy horses (non-acute kidney injury (AKI) group), horses at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI-risk group; divided into colic sufferers, recipients of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and recipients of gentamicin) and horses diagnosed with acute kidney injury (AKI group)
Fig. 2Results of serum (S) and urinary (U) cystatin C in healthy horses (non-acute kidney injury (AKI) group), horses at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI-risk group; divided into colic sufferers, recipients of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and recipients of gentamicin) and horses diagnosed with acute kidney injury (AKI group)
Concentration of serum and urinary cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) measured in healthy horses (non-acute kidney injury (AKI) group), horses at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI-risk group; divided into colic sufferers, recipients of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and recipients of gentamicin) and horses diagnosed with acute kidney injury (AKI group)
| AKI-risk group (n = 30) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Non-AKI group (n = 30) Colic (n = 10) | NSAIDS (n = 10) | Gentamicin (n = 10) | All | AKI | group (n = 11) | |||||||
| Min–max | Me (Q1– n’ Q3) | Min–max | Me (Q1– n’ Q3) | Min–max | Me (Q1– n’ Q3) | Min–max | Me (Q1– n’ Q3) | Min–max | Me (Q1–Q3) n’ | Min–max | Me (Q1–Q3) n’ | ||
| NGAL | Serum | 25.00– 95.20 | 50.50 (38.80– 0 58.80) | 30.70– 201.90 | 73.00 (54.50– 3 129.70) | 27.20– 74.20 | 45.80 (33.70– 0 61.10) | 31.10–91.20 | 48.30 (40.40– 0 57.30) | 27.20– 201.90 | 51.10 (40.40– 3 66.90) | 50.60– 277.60 | 98.10 (59.40– 6 128.20) |
| (ng/mL) | Urine | 8.50– 41.70 | 20.70 (17.90– 4 24.50) | 12.90– 112.10 | 53.40 (31.10– 7 64.20) | 18.80– 59.80 | 30.20 (23.10– 3 47.80) | 12.80–60.90 | 29.80 (25.20– 2 33.00) | 12.80– 112.10 | 32.30 (23.70– 12 55.80) | 19.10– 223.00 | 36.60 (26.80– 7 89.90) |
| Cystatin | Serum C | 0.13–0.71 | 0.25 (0.19– 2 0.37) | 0.09–1.01 | 0.36 (0.19– 3 0.60) | 0.08–0.40 | 0.24 (0.15– 0 0.26) | 0.06–0.55 | 0.19 (0.13– 1 0.26) | 0.06–1.01 | 0.23 (0.15– 0.37) 4 | 0.07–1.71 | 0.61 (0.37– 7 1.13) |
| (mg/L) | Urine | 0.06–0.50 | 0.10 (0.07– 2 0.13) | 0.02–0.43 | 0.25 (0.10– 5 0.35) | 0.07–0.19 | 0.13 (0.12– 0 0.13) | 0.05–0.34 | 0.14 (0.08– 1 0.19) | 0.02–0.43 | 0.13 (0.10– 6 0.19) | 0.10–0.50 | 0.34 (0.22– 9 0.37) |
Me – median; Q1 – first quartile; Q3 – third quartile; S – serum; U – urine; n’ – number of horses with elevated parameter above cut-off value
Spearman’s correlation between the analysed biomarkers and selected conventional renal dysfunction biomarkers
| Parameter | NGAL | Cystatin C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum | Urine | Serum | Urine | ||
| Serum | Urea | rs = 0.360 | NS | rs = 0.300 | rs = 0.340 |
| P = 0.002 | P = 0.014 | P = 0.004 | |||
| Creatinine | NS | NS | NS | rs = 0.300 | |
| P = 0.013 | |||||
| Urine | Protein | NS | rs = 0.360 | NS | rs = 0.400 |
| P < 0.005 | P < 0.001 | ||||
| GGT : Creatinine ratio | rs = 0.300 | rs = 0.390 | NS | rs = 0.370 | |
| P = 0.012 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.005 | |||
| FENa | NS | rs = 0.33 | NS | NS | |
| P = 0.005 | |||||
NGAL – neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; rs – Spearman’s correlation coefficient; GGT – Gamma-glutamyltransferase; FENa – Fractional sodium excretion; NS – statistically nonsignificant
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of serum and urinary cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) relative to kidney dysfunction in horses
| Parameter | Cut-off value | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGAL | Serum | 95.20 | 0.54 | 0.93 | 0.60 | 0.92 | 0.73 |
| Urine | 33.10 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.30 | 0.90 | 0.66 | |
| Cystatin C | Serum | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 0.44 | 0.93 | 0.67 |
| Urine | 0.20 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.50 | 0.96 | 0.84 |
AUC – area under the ROC
Fig. 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis curve showing the sensitivity and specificity of (A) serum and (B) urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in relation to the detection of acute kidney dysfunction in the examined horses AUC – area under ROC
Fig. 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis curve showing the sensitivity and specificity of (A) serum and (B) cystatin C in relation to the detection of acute kidney dysfunction in the examined horses AUC – area under ROC
Significant differences in serum and urine biomarkers between healthy horses (non-acute kidney injury (AKI) group), horses at risk of kidney injury (AKI-risk group; divided into colic sufferers, recipients of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and recipients of gentamicin) and horses diagnosed with acute kidney injury (AKI group)
| Parameter | Non-AKI | AKI-risk colic | AKI-risk NSAIDs | AKI-risk gentamicin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKI | Non-AKI | AKI | Non-AKI | AKI | Non-AKI | AKI | ||
| NGAL (ng/mL) | Serum | 0.0030 | - | - | - | 0.0030 | - | 0.0200 |
| Urine | 0.0050 | 0.0050 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Cystatin C (mg/L) | Serum | 0.0400 | - | - | - | 0.0400 | - | 0.0200 |
| Urine | 0.0001 | 0.0400 | - | - | 0.0400 | - | 0.0300 | |
NGAL – neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin