| Literature DB >> 34885683 |
Paulina Grocholska1, Andrzej Konieczny2, Zuzanna Kaźmierczak3,4, Krystyna Dąbrowska3,4, Karolina Panek-Laszczyńska5, Marlena Kłak3, Wojciech Witkiewicz3, Zbigniew Szewczuk1, Remigiusz Bąchor1.
Abstract
Early detection of any preeclampsia biomarkers may lower the risk of mortality, both for a mother and a child. Our study focuses on techniques for preeclampsia biomarker identification by comparing the results of a method using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode (LC-MS/MS) with those by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test, as well as by comparing the obtained results with clinical data. In the proposed LC-MS/MS method a tryptic digest peptide charge derivatization strategy was used as a tool for sensitive detection of podocin, i.e., a previously discovered preeclampsia biomarker present in urine samples from pregnant women. Urine samples from pregnant women with diagnosed preeclampsia were collected at different stages of pregnancy and from healthy subjects, and then were analyzed by ELISA test and the proposed method with LC-MS/MS. Charge derivatization of the ε amino group of C-terminal lysine residues in tryptic digests by 2,4,6-triphenylpyrylium salt was performed to increase the ionization efficiency in the LC-MS/MS mode. Podocin was identified at the early stage of pregnancy, while its detection using an ELISA test was not possible. The protocol for urine sample preparation was optimized. Our results show that the proposed method by LC-MS/MS in combination with peptide charge derivatization, provides an ultrasensitive tool for diagnosis of preeclampsia, and provides earlier detection than a clinical diagnosis or ELISA test. The proposed solution may revolutionize medical diagnostics.Entities:
Keywords: ELISA; LC-MS; MRM; charge derivatization; podocin; podocyturia; preeclampsia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885683 PMCID: PMC8659024 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Baseline characteristics. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; PE, preeclampsia; CKD, chronic kidney disease.
| Variable | Baseline Values |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 31 ± 7 |
| Weight (kg) | 73 ± 15 |
| Height (cm) | 168 ± 5 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26 ± 5.5 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 127 ± 13 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 79 ± 8 |
| Gestational week at qualification | 12 ± 2 |
| Gestational week at the time of delivery | 37 ± 4 |
| Elective cesarean delivery | 12/28 (43%) |
| Emergency cesarean section | 13/28 (46%) |
| Vaginal birth | 3/28 (11%) |
| 1st pregnancy | 12/31 (39%) |
| 2nd pregnancy | 13/31 (42%) |
| 3rd pregnancy | 4/31 (13%) |
| 4th pregnancy | 2/31 (6%) |
| Multiple pregnancy | 4/31 (13%) |
| A past history of PE | 13/31 (42%) |
| Chronic hypertension | 9/31 (29%) |
| CKD | 2/31 (6%) |
| A family history of PE | 1/31 (3%) |
| Pregestational diabetes | 2/31 (6%) |
Significant differences in blood pressure among patients who were affected by PE. Abbreviations: SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; PW, pregnancy week.
| Variable | Preeclampsia | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| YES | NO | ||
| SBP 12th PW (mmHg) | 134 ± 13 | 123 ± 11 | 0.049 |
| BDP 12th PW (mmHg) | 84 ± 7 | 76 ± 8 | 0.035 |
| DBP 16th PW (mmHg) | 83 ± 4 | 73 ± 9 | 0.016 |
| SBP 20th PW (mmHg) | 131 ± 8 | 119 ± 12 | 0.024 |
| DBP 20th PW (mmHg) | 86 ± 5 | 73 ± 9 | 0.004 |
| SBP 28th PW (mmHg) | 136 ± 17 | 123 ± 10 | 0.03 |
| DBP 28th PW (mmHg) | 86 ± 11 | 76 ± 8 | 0.03 |
| SBP 32th PW (mmHg) | 131 ± 14 | 122 ± 8 | 0.046 |
Logistic regression results for predicting PE. OR—odds ratio, CI—confidence interval.
| Variable | Estimate | OR | CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBP at 20th week of pregnancy | 0.18 | 1.2 | 1.02–1.43 | 0.025 |
Figure 1LC-MS/MS analysis of charge derivatized tryptic digests of urine sediment samples from: (A) A healthy pregnant women; (B) a subject with identified podocin. MRM transitions corresponding to the model peptide with the 292MIAAEAEK299 sequence.
Comparison of the clinical LC-MS/MS and ELISA data for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Levels of podocin in human urine samples based on the ELISA test. Results were normalized and values were calculated regarding a standard curve, obtained for podocin-coated wells. “Undetectable” means a reading below the detection level; PE, preeclampsia; “+”, positive result; “-”, negative result.
| Patient No. | Podocin Level at the Beginning of Pregnancy (ng/mL) | Podocin Level at the End of Pregnancy (ng/mL) | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.166 | 0.473 | −59 |
| 2 | 0.321 | 0.878 | 174 |
| 3 | 2.128 | 1.588 | −25 |
| 4 | 0.625 | 0.693 | 11 |
| 5 | 0.49 | 0.895 | 83 |
| 6 | 1.318 | 0.997 | −24 |
| 7 | Undetectable | 0.659 | |
| 8 | 1.301 | 0.439 | −66 |
| 9 | 0.051 | 1.402 | 2649 |
| 10 | 0.591 | 0.659 | 12 |
| 11 | Undetectable | 0.608 | |
| 12 | 0.895 | 0.321 | −64 |
| 13 | Undetectable | 0.017 | |
| 14 | 0.253 | - | |
| 15 | Undetectable | 0.321 | |
| 16 | 0.287 | 1.334 | 365 |
| 17 | 0.051 | 0.321 | 529 |
| 18 | Undetectable | 0.152 | |
| 19 | Undetectable | Undetectable | |
| 20 | 0.27 | 0.101 | −63 |
| 21 | 0.338 | 6.976 | 1964 |
| 22 | 0.321 | Undetectable | |
| 23 | 1.081 | 0.22 | −80 |
| 24 | 0.659 | 0.811 | 23 |
| 25 | 0.726 | 0.405 | −44 |
| 26 | 0.186 | 0.118 | −37 |
| 27 | Undetectable | Undetectable | |
| 28 | 1.284 | Undetectable |
Statistical analysis of preeclampsia prediction using the proposed LC-MS/MS method in 11th week of pregnancy. CI—confidence interval.
| Statistic | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 14.29% | From 0.36 to 57.87% |
| Specificity | 100.00% | From 83.89 to 100.00% |
| Positive likelihood ratio | ||
| Negative likelihood ratio | 0.86 | From 0.63 to 1.16 |
| Disease prevalence | 25.00% | From 10.69 to 44.87% |
| Positive predictive value | 100.00% | |
| Negative predictive value | 77.78% | From 72.12 to 82.57% |
| Accuracy | 78.57% | From 59.05 to 91.70% |
Statistical analysis of preeclampsia prediction using the proposed LC-MS/MS method in the 24th week of pregnancy. CI—confidence interval.
| Statistic | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 85.71% | From 42.13 to 99.64% |
| Specificity | 100.00% | From 83.89 to 100.00% |
| Positive likelihood ratio | ||
| Negative likelihood ratio | 0.14 | From 0.02 to 0.88 |
| Disease prevalence | 25.00% | From 10.69 to 44.87% |
| Positive predictive value | 100.00% | |
| Negative predictive value | 95.45% | From 77.38 to 99.23% |
| Accuracy | 96.43% | From 81.65 to 99.91% |
Statistical analysis of preeclampsia prediction using the proposed LC-MS/MS method in the 36th week of pregnancy. CI—confidence interval.
| Statistic | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 85.71% | From 42.13 to 99.64% |
| Specificity | 90.48% | From 69.62 to 98.83% |
| Positive likelihood ratio | 9.00 | From 2.33 to 34.80 |
| Negative likelihood ratio | 0.16 | From 0.03 to 0.97 |
| Disease prevalence | 25.00% | From 10.69 to 44.87% |
| Positive predictive value | 75.00% | From 43.69 to 92.06% |
| Negative predictive value | 95.00% | From 75.48 to 99.15% |
| Accuracy | 89.29% | From 71.77 to 97.73% |