Literature DB >> 3305720

Use of a direct fluorescent antibody test for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection in women seeking routine gynecologic care.

R S Phillips, P A Hanff, R S Kauffman, M D Aronson.   

Abstract

We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a direct fluorescence test for Chlamydia trachomatis infection compared with culture of the endocervix in women seeking routine gynecologic care. Of 527 patients seen in a hospital-based practice, 23 (4.4%) had a positive culture for C. trachomatis. The overall sensitivity of the direct test was 70%, and the specificity was 98%. When five or more endocervical cells were present on the direct test slide, the sensitivity increased to 92%, and the specificity decreased to 96% (P less than .05). When the presence of any columnar epithelial cells, five or more elementary bodies, or both was used as the criteria for accepting specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of the direct test were 80% and 96%, respectively. However, 44% of the specimens would be rejected if these criteria were used. The overall probability that an individual with a positive direct test would have a positive culture was 62%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3305720     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/156.4.575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  27 in total

1.  Accuracy of two enzyme immunoassays and cell culture in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in low and high risk populations in Senegal.

Authors:  E Van Dyck; N Samb; A D Sarr; L Van de Velden; J Moran; S Mboup; I Ndoye; J L Lamboray; A Meheus; P Piot
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.

Authors:  M F Stern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Comparison of DNA probe, monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  W LeBar; B Herschman; C Jemal; J Pierzchala
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Effect of endocervical-specimen adequacy on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the APTIMA COMBO 2 assay.

Authors:  C K Rogers; B J Wood; P Rizzo; C A Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

6.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in a Turkish population.

Authors:  E Ertem; D Dereli; D Serter; K Yüce
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-08

7.  Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence using a Cytobrush sampling technique.

Authors:  R A Ciotti; S J Sondheimer; I Nachamkin
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1988-08

8.  Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; C L Murray; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Accuracy of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection methods in a low-prevalence population in a primary care setting.

Authors:  P H Gann; J E Herrmann; L Candib; R W Hudson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.