| Literature DB >> 33054774 |
Maria Seidel1,2, Stefan Ehrlich3, Lauren Breithaupt4,5, Elisabeth Welch6,7, Camilla Wiklund2, Christopher Hübel2,8,9,10, Laura M Thornton11, Androula Savva2, Bengt T Fundin2, Jessica Pege2, Annelie Billger2, Afrouz Abbaspour2, Martin Schaefer11, Ilka Boehm1, Johan Zvrskovec2,8, Emilie Vangsgaard Rosager12, Katharina Collin Hasselbalch12, Virpi Leppä2, Magnus Sjögren12,13, Ricard Nergårdh14, Jamie D Feusner15, Ata Ghaderi8,11, Cynthia M Bulik16,17,18.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe disorder, for which genetic evidence suggests psychiatric as well as metabolic origins. AN has high somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, broad impact on quality of life, and elevated mortality. Risk factor studies of AN have focused on differences between acutely ill and recovered individuals. Such comparisons often yield ambiguous conclusions, as alterations could reflect different effects depending on the comparison. Whereas differences found in acutely ill patients could reflect state effects that are due to acute starvation or acute disease-specific factors, they could also reflect underlying traits. Observations in recovered individuals could reflect either an underlying trait or a "scar" due to lasting effects of sustained undernutrition and illness. The co-twin control design (i.e., monozygotic [MZ] twins who are discordant for AN and MZ concordant control twin pairs) affords at least partial disambiguation of these effects.Entities:
Keywords: Anorexia nervosa; Cognitive functions; Genetics; Metabolism; Microbiota; Neuroimaging; Risk factors; Study protocol; Twin study
Year: 2020 PMID: 33054774 PMCID: PMC7557028 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02903-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Psychiatry ISSN: 1471-244X Impact factor: 3.630
Fig. 1Overview of possible comparisons between twins to investigate whether effects constitute state, trait, or “scar” markers. Lines indicate comparisons where observed differences would imply state, trait, or “scar” effects respectively
Fig. 2Overview of the study schedule. Participants undergo a 30 h protocol, starting at 8:30 am in the morning of day 1 until approximately 1:00 pm of day 2. Study components flow as per Fig. 3. Individuals wear an accelerometer for 29 h of the study. The fasting period commences at 18:30 following dinner on day 1 and continues until 12:30 on day 2. Neurocognitive testing, neuroimaging, biological sampling, and microdialysis are conducted before (T1) and after (T2) the experimental fast
Fig. 3Inclusion (↓)/Exclusion (→) procedures for recruitment. Pre-screening begins at Stage 1. Individuals are screened with the ED100K online questionnaire [113] for lifetime eating disorder symptoms as well as genetic testing. Participants are excluded if screening reveals them to be dizygotic or if the unaffected co-twin is discovered to be affected. Screening at Stage 2 is more intensive and includes telephone interviews by trained interviewers conducting the Eating Disorder Examination [EDE [23]], Mini-International-Neuropsychiatric-Interview [MINI, [106]], and the Eating Disorders section of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 [SCID-5 [32]]. If all criteria fulfilled and participants remain interested in participating, they are invited to participate in the 30 h study protocol
Overview of questionnaire measures used in the sample. For more detailed information of each of the instruments please refer to the Supplementary Material (1.3.1–1.3.20, Additional file 1
| Questionnaire | Measure |
|---|---|
| MiniMeal-Questionnaire | General diet behaviors |
| Impulsive Behavior Scale (SUPPS-P) | Impulsivity |
| Active-Questionnaire (Active-Q) | Physical activity |
| Eating Disorder Examination - Questionnaire (EDE-Q) | Disordered eating behavior |
| Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI) | Quality of life |
| Nicotine Dependency Scale | Nicotine dependence |
| Hormonal, Menstrual and Reproductive History (HMRH) | Reproductive history |
| Perception of Teasing Scale (POTS) | Weight and competency teasing |
| Edinburgh Handedness Inventory | Handedness |
| Behavioral Inhibition/Approach System (BIS/BAS) | Behavioral inhibition and approach tendencies |
| Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS) | Perfectionism |
| Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) | Depression |
| Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) | Severity of anxiety disorder |
| Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ-10) | Position on the autism-normality continuum |
| Obsessive Compulsive Inventory – Revised (OCI-R) | Compulsive behaviour |
| Big Five Inventory (BFI) | Extraversion, agreeableness, consciousness, neuroticism, openness |
| Online 24-Hour Recall Log Book | Nutrition intake |
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Hunger and thirst |
| Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) | Positive and negative affect |
| Stool and Medication Questionnaire | Gastrointestinal symptoms and medication intake |
Overview of tests of neurocognitive function and body image distortion applied during timepoint 1 (T1) and timepoint 2 (T2). The Set-shifting battery is based on Wolff et al. [125]; the Value-based- decision making battery (VBDM) based on Pooseh et al. [90]. The Somatomap 3D is conducted according to Ralph-Nearman et al. [94]. The Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure Test [78] was used
| Task | Measure | T1 | T2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Set-shifting | Set-shifting ability (color-shape, category switching, number-letter task) | X | X |
| Value-based decision making battery | Delay discounting, reward sensitivity, punishment sensitivity | X | X |
| Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figures Test | Perceptual organization & visual memory | X | X |
| Somatomap 3D | Body image distortion | X | X |
| Raven‘s SPM | Cognitive ability | X |
Overview of sequences and acquired measures during the MRI session for timepoint 1 (T1) and timepoint 2 (T2). Established tasks were used for the investigation of reward processing [28], food processing [20], emotional face processing [95], and visual processing [66]
| Scan | Measure | T1 | T2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1W | T1-weighted structural brain image | X | |
| DTI | Diffusion weighted brain image | X | |
| Resting State | Resting state connectivity | X | X |
| Monetary reward task | Reward processing | X | X |
| Food viewing | Food cue reactivity | X | X |
| Fearful faces task | Emotional processing | X | |
| Houses task | General visual processing | X | |
Overview of endocrinological parameters measured from blood samples during three different timepoints
| Analysis | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) | X | X | X | Plasma |
| Cortisol | X | X | X | Serum |
| Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) | (X) | X | Serum | |
| Free triiodothyronine (fT3) | (X) | X | Serum | |
| Free thyroxine (fT4) | (X) | X | Serum | |
| Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) | X | Serum | ||
| Luteinizing hormone (LH) | X | Serum | ||
| Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEAS) | X | Serum | ||
| Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) | X | Serum | ||
| Testosterone | X | Serum | ||
| Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) | X | X | Serum | |
| Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) | X | X | Serum | |
| Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) | X | X | Serum | |
| Acyl/deacyl-ghrelin | X | X | X | Plasma |
| Adiponectin (ADIP) | X | X | X | Serum |
| Leptin | X | Serum | ||
| Sodium | X | X | Plasma | |
| Sodium | X | X | Urine | |
Overview of immunological markers estimated from blood during day 1 and day 2
| Analysis | Marker |
|---|---|
| Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) | |
| Interleukin 6 (IL-6) | |
| Interleukin 8 (IL-8) | |
| Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) | |
| Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 (CCL5)/regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) | |
| Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1) | |
| High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) | |
| Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) | |
| Double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (dsDNA) | |
| Nucleosomes | |
| | Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) |
| | Aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) |
| Glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) | |
| α-fetoprotein (AFP) | |
| microRNA-122 (mRNA-122) | |
| Creatine kinase (CK) | |
| Total & cleared cytokeratin 18 (CK-18) | |
Overview over expected differences/similarities between subgroups. ≠ describes expected differences, = describes expected similarities between participants. Case Affected I = Case Twin affected from the disorder and currently ill. Case Affected R = Case Twin affected by the disorder and currently recovered, Case Unaffected = Monozygotic twin sister of the currently ill or recovered affected twin, Control = Healthy control twin
| Parameter | Case Affected I vs Case Affected R | Case Affected I vs Case Unaffected | Case Affected R vs Case Unaffected | Case Affected I vs Control | Case Affected R vs Control | Case Unaffected vs Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≠ | ≠ | = | ≠ | = | = | |
| = | = | = | ≠ | ≠ | ≠ | |
| = | ≠ | ≠ | ≠ | ≠ | = |