Literature DB >> 27736135

Action versus state orientation moderates the impact of executive functioning on real-life self-control.

Max Wolff1, Klaus-Martin Krönke2, John Venz2, Anja Kräplin2, Gerhard Bühringer2, Michael N Smolka1, Thomas Goschke2.   

Abstract

Self-control is commonly assumed to depend on executive functions (EFs). However, it is unclear whether real-life self-control failures result from deficient EF competencies or rather reflect insufficient conflict-induced mobilization of executive control, and whether self-control depends more critically on function-specific EF competencies or general executive functioning (GEF), that is, common competencies that underlie all EFs. Here we investigated whether failure-related action versus state orientation, a personality trait related to the conflict-induced mobilization of cognitive control, moderates the effect of general and function-specific control competencies on self-control. To this end, 240 young adults completed questionnaire measures of action-state orientation and trait self-control, reported everyday self-control failures during 7 consecutive days via smartphone-based experience sampling, and completed 9 EF tasks from which latent variables reflecting GEF as well as inhibition-, updating-, and shifting-specific competencies were derived. Structural equation models confirmed that the effect of GEF on self-control was moderated by action-state orientation: action-oriented compared with more state-oriented participants showed a stronger inverse association between GEF and everyday self-control failures. Corresponding effects of function-specific competencies on self-control were not found. These results highlight that high executive functioning may enable self-controlled behavior only if control is sufficiently mobilized when needed and suggest that self-control may depend more critically on general than function-specific control competencies. More generally, the present study demonstrates the fruitfulness of combining latent-variable models of well-controlled EF tasks with experience sampling of daily self-control and measures of individual differences in control modes to bridge the gap between laboratory research and real-life behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27736135     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  18 in total

1.  Reduced self-regulation mirrors the distorting effects of burnout symptomatology on task difficulty perception during an inhibition task.

Authors:  Magdalena Katharina Wekenborg; LaBarron K Hill; Robert Miller; Tobias Stalder; Julian Francis Thayer; Marlene Sophie Penz; Clemens Kirschbaum
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 3.493

2.  The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies.

Authors:  Justin E Karr; Corson N Areshenkoff; Philippe Rast; Scott M Hofer; Grant L Iverson; Mauricio A Garcia-Barrera
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Monitor yourself! Deficient error-related brain activity predicts real-life self-control failures.

Authors:  Klaus-Martin Krönke; Max Wolff; Holger Mohr; Anja Kräplin; Michael N Smolka; Gerhard Bühringer; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The relationship between executive functioning and addictive behavior: new insights from a longitudinal community study.

Authors:  Anja Kräplin; Mohsen Joshanloo; Max Wolff; Klaus-Martin Krönke; Thomas Goschke; Gerhard Bühringer; Michael N Smolka
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.415

5.  Real-life self-control conflicts in anorexia nervosa: An ecological momentary assessment investigation.

Authors:  Sophia Fürtjes; Maria Seidel; Stefan Diestel; Max Wolff; Joseph A King; Inger Hellerhoff; Fabio Bernadoni; Katrin Gramatke; Thomas Goschke; Veit Roessner; Stefan Ehrlich
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 7.156

6.  Acute alcohol does not impair attentional inhibition as measured with Stroop interference scores but impairs Stroop performance.

Authors:  P Riedel; M Wolff; M Spreer; J Petzold; M H Plawecki; T Goschke; U S Zimmermann; M N Smolka
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Thinking in action: Need for Cognition predicts Self-Control together with Action Orientation.

Authors:  Julia Grass; Florian Krieger; Philipp Paulus; Samuel Greiff; Anja Strobel; Alexander Strobel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Becoming who you are: An integrative review of self-determination theory and personality systems interactions theory.

Authors:  Sander L Koole; Caroline Schlinkert; Tobias Maldei; Nicola Baumann
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2018-04-23

9.  Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?

Authors:  Kenneth R Paap; Regina Anders-Jefferson; Brandon Zimiga; Lauren Mason; Roman Mikulinsky
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-02-13

10.  The Behavior and Mind Health (BeMIND) study: Methods, design and baseline sample characteristics of a cohort study among adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Katja Beesdo-Baum; Catharina Voss; John Venz; Jana Hoyer; Johanna Berwanger; Hanna Kische; Theresa Magdalena Ollmann; Lars Pieper
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.