| Literature DB >> 33050884 |
Lindsay Harrison1, Emilia Kooienga1, Cori Speights1, Jeffery Tomberlin2, Marcus Lashley3, Brandon Barton1, Heather Jordan4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Each death event can be characterized by its associated microbes - a living community of bacteria composed of carcass, soil, and insect-introduced bacterial species - a necrobiome. With the possibility for close succession of these death events, it may be beneficial to characterize how the magnitude of an initial death event may impact the decomposition and necrobiomes of subsequent death events in close proximity. In this paper we hope to characterize the microbial communities associated with a proximate subsequent death event, and distinguish any changes within those communities based on the magnitude of an initial death event and the biomass of preexisting carcass (es) undergoing decomposition. For this experiment, 6 feral swine carcasses in containers were placed in the vicinity of preexisting and ongoing carcass decomposition at sites of three different scales of decomposing carcass biomass. Swab samples were collected from the skin and eye sockets of the container pigs and subjected to 16 s rRNA sequencing and OTU assignment.Entities:
Keywords: Decomposition; Mass mortality; Microbial succession
Year: 2020 PMID: 33050884 PMCID: PMC7557037 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-01969-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1a Schematic of initial and secondary mortality event placement. The initial mortality event was made up of previously placed swine carcasses in increasing biomass at differing sites. Weights refer to the biomass of the initially placed swine biomass that is representing the initial death event. Fenced and unfenced replicates of initial decomposition sites of increasing biomass were constructed at least 100 m apart. Swine in the buckets were placed within 3 m of each initial mortality event site. After transport to the common garden, buckets were placed ~ 1 m apart. b Feral swine covered with insect larvae within enclosed bucket at the 4D timepoint. Insect larvae were allowed access to carcass for 4H at the initial mortality event sites. Swine were then covered in mesh and transported to a common garden
Fig. 2Principle component analysis plots of skin and Internal samples using Bray-Curtis distances at 0H (a, p = 0.003), 3H (b, p = 0.995), and 4D (c, p = 0.037) timepoints
Fig. 3Genus-level relative abundance for skin and internal samples for each timepoint sampled. OTUs with less than 2% abundance were excluded
Results of PERMANOVA analyses for each of the three timepoints using 999 permutations and rarefied data. Degrees of freedom was 1 for each test. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant
| Time 0 | Time 3Hrs | Time 4 Days | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F Stat. | P | F Stat. | P | F Stat. | P | |
| Swab Type | 4.27 | 0.003* | 0.35 | 0.998 | 2.09 | 0.022* |
| Biomass | 0.94 | 0.497 | 1.08 | 0.357 | 0.31 | 0.967 |
| Fencing | 1.10 | 0.315 | 1.57 | 0.120 | 1.27 | 0.239 |
| Type*Biomass | 0.74 | 0.700 | 1.25 | 0.177 | 2.22 | 0.061 |
| Type*Fencing | 1.03 | 0.390 | 1.40 | 0.137 | 0.72 | 0.594 |
| Biomass*Fencing | 0.89 | 0.527 | 1.05 | 0.378 | 1.35 | 0.245 |
*denotes a significant p value
Fig. 4PCoA plot comparing overall community diversity at three timepoints using Bray-Curtis distances. Significance was found between 0 h and 3 h, and 4 day timepoints (p < 0.01)
Fig. 5Alpha diversity of combined skin and internal communities by timepoint using Chao index from data rarefied to the lowest number of OTUs. A decreasing trend in diversity was observed
Fig. 6Alpha diversity using Chao1 and Shannon indices for skin (a) and internal (b) communities across three timepoints. Diversity showed a decreasing trend over time using both indices
Most important classifying taxa for distinguishing early from late timepoints using Random Forest model
| Most Important Classifying Taxa | Mean Decrease Gini | % of T0/T3 | % of T4Day |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.10 | 6.9 | 0.003 | |
| 8.27 | 0.05 | 30.2 | |
| 4.59 | 0.58 | 28.6 | |
| 4.50 | 0.03 | 4.8 | |
| 2.13 | 4.4 | 0.24 | |
| 1.86 | 5.6 | 0.0 | |
| 1.83 | 7.4 | 0.07 | |
| 0.78 | 5.8 | 0.02 | |
| 0.12 | 5.7 | 0.25 | |
| 0.07 | 9.2 | 10.5 |
Assembled table of notable pathogenic species and their prevalence in early and late timepoints
| Bacterial Species | Time 0 | Time 4 Day | Human | Livestock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37 | 0 | Y | Y | |
| 7 | 23 | |||
| 202 | 1 | Y | ||
| 21 | 0 | Y | Y | |
| 4137 | 2 | Y | Y | |
| 13,431 | 125 | Y | ||
| 0 | 77 | Y | ||
| 6585 | 1 | Y | ||
| 15,208 | 78 | Y | ||
| 186 | 9 | Y | ||
| 24 | 0 | Y | Y | |
| 69 | 12 | Y | Y | |
| 1559 | 6 | Y | ||
| 92 | 0 | Y | ||
| 304 | 831 | Y | Y | |
| 71,053 | 26,675 | Y | ||
| 352 | 0 | Y | Y | |
| 23 | 42 | Y | ||
| 40 | 2 | Y | ||
| 38,699 | 87 | Y | ||
| 3033 | 16 | Y | ||
| 117 | 20 | Y | ||
| 101 | 5 | Y |