Literature DB >> 33047401

Environmental and morphological constraints interact to drive the evolution of communication signals in frogs.

Matías I Muñoz1, Sandra Goutte2, Jacintha Ellers1, Wouter Halfwerk1.   

Abstract

Animals show a rich diversity of signals and displays. Among the many selective forces driving the evolution of communication signals, one widely recognized factor is the structure of the environment where animals communicate. In particular, animals communicating by sounds often emit acoustic signals from specific locations, such as high up in the air, from the ground or in the water. The properties of these different display sites may impose different constraints on sound production, and therefore drive signal evolution. Here, we used comparative phylogenetic analyses to assess the relationship between calling site (aquatic versus nonaquatic), body size and call dominant frequency of 160 frog species from the families Ranidae, Leptodactylidae and Hylidae. We found that the frequency of frogs calling from the water was lower than that of species calling outside of the water, a trend that was consistent across the three families studied. Furthermore, phylogenetic path analysis revealed that call site had both direct and indirect effects on call frequency. Indirect effects were mediated by call site influencing male body size, which in turn was negatively associated with call frequency. Our results suggest that properties of display sites can drive signal evolution, most likely not only through morphological constraints imposed on the sound production mechanism, but also through changes in body size, highlighting the relevance of the interplay between morphological adaptation and signal evolution. Changes in display site may therefore have important evolutionary consequences, as it may influence sexual selection processes and ultimately may even promote speciation.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  constraint; display site; dominant frequency; frog; signal evolution; vocal communication

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33047401      PMCID: PMC7756787          DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  22 in total

1.  Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches.

Authors:  J Podos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A simple frequency-scaling rule for animal communication.

Authors:  Neville H Fletcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Intraspecific scaling in frog calls: the interplay of temperature, body size and metabolic condition.

Authors:  Lucia Ziegler; Matías Arim; Francisco Bozinovic
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Disentangling evolutionary cause-effect relationships with phylogenetic confirmatory path analysis.

Authors:  Achaz von Hardenberg; Alejandro Gonzalez-Voyer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Sander Bot; Jasper Buikx; Marco van der Velde; Jan Komdeur; Carel ten Cate; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Environmental constraints and call evolution in torrent-dwelling frogs.

Authors:  Sandra Goutte; Alain Dubois; Samuel D Howard; Rafael Marquez; Jodi J L Rowley; J Maximilian Dehling; Philippe Grandcolas; Xiong Rongchuan; Frédéric Legendre
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Floating frogs sound larger: environmental constraints on signal production drives call frequency changes.

Authors:  Sandra Goutte; Matías I Muñoz; Michael J Ryan; Wouter Halfwerk
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2020-09-24

8.  Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology.

Authors:  Elizabeth Perrault Derryberry; Nathalie Seddon; Graham Earnest Derryberry; Santiago Claramunt; Glenn Fairbanks Seeholzer; Robb Thomas Brumfield; Joseph Andrew Tobias
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  phylopath: Easy phylogenetic path analysis in R.

Authors:  Wouter van der Bijl
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Environmental and morphological constraints interact to drive the evolution of communication signals in frogs.

Authors:  Matías I Muñoz; Sandra Goutte; Jacintha Ellers; Wouter Halfwerk
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.411

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive overview of the effects of urbanisation on sexual selection and sexual traits.

Authors:  Andrew D Cronin; Judith A H Smit; Matías I Muñoz; Armand Poirier; Peter A Moran; Paul Jerem; Wouter Halfwerk
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-09

2.  Environmental and morphological constraints interact to drive the evolution of communication signals in frogs.

Authors:  Matías I Muñoz; Sandra Goutte; Jacintha Ellers; Wouter Halfwerk
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.