Literature DB >> 15139646

A simple frequency-scaling rule for animal communication.

Neville H Fletcher1.   

Abstract

Different animals use widely different frequencies for sound communication, and it is reasonable to assume that evolution has adapted these frequencies to give greatest conspecific communication distance for a given vocal effort. Acoustic analysis shows that the optimal communication frequency is inversely proportional to about the 0.4 power of the animal's body mass. Comparison with observational data indicates that this prediction is well supported in practice. For animals of a given class, for example mammals, the maximum communication distance varies about as the 0.6 power of the animal's mass. There is, however, a wide spread of observed results because of the different emphasis placed upon vocal effort in the evolution of different animal species.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15139646     DOI: 10.1121/1.1694997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Intraspecific scaling in frog calls: the interplay of temperature, body size and metabolic condition.

Authors:  Lucia Ziegler; Matías Arim; Francisco Bozinovic
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Radiation efficiency for long-range vocal communication in mammals and birds.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Anil Palaparthi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  The Calyx of Held: A Hypothesis on the Need for Reliable Timing in an Intensity-Difference Encoder.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Laurence O Trussell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The energetic basis of acoustic communication.

Authors:  James F Gillooly; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The anatomy of vocal divergence in North American Elk and European red deer.

Authors:  Roland Frey; Tobias Riede
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 1.804

6.  Vocal fold elasticity of the Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) - producing high fundamental frequency vocalization with a very long vocal fold.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Rapid evolution of the primate larynx?

Authors:  Daniel L Bowling; Jacob C Dunn; Jeroen B Smaers; Maxime Garcia; Asha Sato; Georg Hantke; Stephan Handschuh; Sabine Dengg; Max Kerney; Andrew C Kitchener; Michaela Gumpenberger; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Roars, groans and moans: Anatomical correlates of vocal diversity in polygynous deer.

Authors:  Roland Frey; Megan Tompkins Wyman; Malcolm Johnston; Michael Schofield; Yann Locatelli; David Reby
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Contingency and determinism in the evolution of bird song sound frequency.

Authors:  Jakob I Friis; Torben Dabelsteen; Gonçalo C Cardoso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A novel theory of Asian elephant high-frequency squeak production.

Authors:  Veronika C Beeck; Gunnar Heilmann; Michael Kerscher; Angela S Stoeger
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.