Literature DB >> 21876157

Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions.

Wouter Halfwerk1, Sander Bot, Jasper Buikx, Marco van der Velde, Jan Komdeur, Carel ten Cate, Hans Slabbekoorn.   

Abstract

Many animal species communicate with their mates through acoustic signals, but this communication seems to become a struggle in urbanized areas because of increasing anthropogenic noise levels. Several bird species have been reported to increase song frequency by which they reduce the masking impact of spectrally overlapping noise. However, it remains unclear whether such behavioral flexibility provides a sufficient solution to noisy urban conditions or whether there are hidden costs. Species may rely on low frequencies to attract and impress females, and the use of high frequencies may, therefore, come at the cost of reduced attractiveness. We studied the potential tradeoff between signal strength and signal detection in a successful urban bird species, the great tit (Parus major). We show that the use of low-frequency songs by males is related to female fertility as well as sexual fidelity. We experimentally show that urban noise conditions impair male-female communication and that signal efficiency depends on song frequency in the presence of noise. Our data reveal a response advantage for high-frequency songs during sexual signaling in noisy conditions, whereas low-frequency songs are likely to be preferred. These data are critical for our understanding of the impact of anthropogenic noise on wild-ranging birds, because they provide evidence for low-frequency songs being linked to reproductive success and to be affected by noise-dependent signal efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21876157      PMCID: PMC3167545          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109091108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches.

Authors:  J Podos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds.

Authors:  Daniel J Mennill; Laurene M Ratcliffe; Peter T Boag
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Niels Bouton; Ilse van Opzeeland; Aukje Coers; Carel ten Cate; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Passerine extrapair mating dynamics: a bayesian modeling approach comparing four species.

Authors:  Jon E Brommer; Jussi S Alho; Clotilde Biard; Joanne R Chapman; Anne Charmantier; Amelie Dreiss; Ian R Hartley; Mårten B Hjernquist; Bart Kempenaers; Jan Komdeur; Toni Laaksonen; Paula K Lehtonen; Thomas Lubjuhn; Samantha C Patrick; Balázs Rosivall; Joost M Tinbergen; Marco van der Velde; Kees van Oers; Tomasz Wilk; Wolfgang Winkel
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Eira Bermúdez-Cuamatzin; Alejandro A Ríos-Chelén; Diego Gil; Constantino Macías Garcia
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Character displacement of song and morphology in African tinkerbirds.

Authors:  Alexander N G Kirschel; Daniel T Blumstein; Thomas B Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Effects of road networks on bird populations.

Authors:  A V Kociolek; A P Clevenger; C C St Clair; D S Proppe
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Behavioral plasticity allows short-term adjustment to a novel environment.

Authors:  Karin Gross; Gilberto Pasinelli; Hansjoerg P Kunc
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Maternal effects contribute to the superior performance of extra-pair offspring.

Authors:  Michael J L Magrath; Oscar Vedder; Marco van der Velde; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  38 in total

1.  Are low-frequency songs sexually selected, and do they lose their potency in male-female interactions under noisy conditions?

Authors:  Marcel Eens; Hector Fabio Rivera-Gutierrez; Rianne Pinxten
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Is sociality required for the evolution of communicative complexity? Evidence weighed against alternative hypotheses in diverse taxonomic groups.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Joan Garcia-Porta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Erica L Morley; Gareth Jones; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Learning to cope: vocal adjustment to urban noise is correlated with prior experience in black-capped chickadees.

Authors:  Stefanie E LaZerte; Hans Slabbekoorn; Ken A Otter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  Mate choice in a polluted world: consequences for individuals, populations and communities.

Authors:  Ulrika Candolin; Bob B M Wong
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  On the evolution of noise-dependent vocal plasticity in birds.

Authors:  Sophie Schuster; Sue Anne Zollinger; John A Lesku; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Noise pollution alters ecological services: enhanced pollination and disrupted seed dispersal.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Nathan J Kleist; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Timing as a sexually selected trait: the right mate at the right moment.

Authors:  Michaela Hau; Davide Dominoni; Stefania Casagrande; C Loren Buck; Gabriela Wagner; David Hazlerigg; Timothy Greives; Roelof A Hut
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Plant-animal interactions in suburban environments: implications for floral evolution.

Authors:  Rebecca E Irwin; Paige S Warren; Adrian L Carper; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.