| Literature DB >> 33046114 |
Elin Videvall1,2, Se Jin Song3,4, Hanna M Bensch5, Maria Strandh5, Anel Engelbrecht6, Naomi Serfontein7, Olof Hellgren5, Adriaan Olivier8, Schalk Cloete6,9, Rob Knight3,4,10,11, Charlie K Cornwallis5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Imbalances in the gut microbial community (dysbiosis) of vertebrates have been associated with several gastrointestinal and autoimmune diseases. However, it is unclear which taxa are associated with gut dysbiosis, and if particular gut regions or specific time periods during ontogeny are more susceptible. We also know very little of this process in non-model organisms, despite an increasing realization of the general importance of gut microbiota for health.Entities:
Keywords: Disease; Dysbacteriosis; Gastrointestinal tract; Gut microbiota; Inflammation; Microbial diversity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33046114 PMCID: PMC7552511 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-020-00925-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1Mortality patterns of ostriches up to 12 weeks of age. a One of the ostrich chicks included in the study at 1 week old. b The cumulative mortality and mortality rate per week. c, d Log-transformed weights over time of control individuals that were randomly selected for euthanization at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 (blue lines in c), and individuals that died of suspected disease (red lines in d). Grey lines illustrate weights of all other individuals that survived the whole period. e Photographs during dissection illustrating widespread gut inflammation in a diseased individual (bottom) compared to a control individual (top)
Fig. 2Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities between the microbiomes of control individuals (blue) and diseased individuals (red). Ellipses denote 90% confidence intervals
PERMANOVA of microbiome dissimilarities across three gut regions
| Ileum | Cecum | Colon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | wUF | BC | wUF | BC | wUF | |
| Disease | 15.5 *** | 8.2 *** | 10.8 *** | 11.7 *** | 7.9 *** | 18.2 *** |
| Age | 2.1 * | 0.8 | 5.7 *** | 3.0 ** | 7.1 *** | 5.8 *** |
| Age2 | 1.6 * | 0.5 | 2.8 *** | 4.8 *** | 3.5 *** | 3.1 ** |
| Group | 3.1 | 4.9 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Sex | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Time since death | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
Effect sizes are displayed as R2 values in percentage with the number of stars indicating level of statistical significance, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. BC = Bray–Curtis distances, wUF = weighted UniFrac distances
Fig. 3Alpha diversity (Shannon index) during development in the ileum, cecum, and colon. Control individuals are shown in blue and diseased individuals in red. Lines display the fitted local regression smoothing curves and shaded areas the 95% confidence interval. Bottom right panel shows all alpha diversity values together
Fig. 4The proportion of bacterial classes per individual and gut region, sorted by age (left bars = youngest, right bars = oldest). Left column = control individuals, right column = diseased individuals. Top row = ileum, middle row = cecum, bottom row = colon
Fig. 5Differentially abundant OTUs (q < 0.01) between control and diseased individuals, separate for the three gut regions. y-axes show taxonomic families and OTUs have been colored at the class level. Positive log2 fold changes indicate higher OTU abundance in the control individuals and negative log2 fold changes indicate higher abundance in the diseased individuals. NA = OTUs without family classification
Fig. 6Abundances (normalised and log-transformed) of two bacterial families associated with disease in the weeks preceding death, measured by repeated fecal sampling of individuals. Points and error bars represent means ± SE
Fig. 7Environmental sources of bacteria present in the different gut sections. C = control individuals and D = diseased individuals