Literature DB >> 33044707

Biomechanical comparison of screw osteosyntheses and anatomical plating for coronoid shear fractures of the ulna.

Valentin Rausch1, Birger Jettkant2,3, Sebastian Lotzien2, Thomas Rosteius2, Eileen Mempel2, Thomas A Schildhauer2, Dominik Seybold2, Jan Geßmann2, Matthias Königshausen2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Among the few techniques described for the treatment of coronoid fractures, osteosynthesis techniques include screw osteosynthesis from anterior to posterior (AP) or from posterior to anterior (PA) and plate osteosynthesis. The aim of this study was to test the biomechanical stability of screw osteosynthesis and plate osteosynthesis using anatomical plates in coronoid process fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: On a total of 25 biomechanical synthetical ulnae, a coronoid shear fracture including 70% of the coronoid height was simulated. Osteosynthesis was then performed using two 2.7 mm screws from anterior, posterior and with use of three different anatomical plates of the coronoid process. For the biomechanical testing, axial load was applied to the fragment with 1000 cycles from 5 to 250 N, load to failure and load at 100 µm displacement. Displacements were measured using a point-based three-dimensional motion analysis system.
RESULTS: Osteosynthesis using the PA-screw showed significant more displacement during cyclic loading compared with all other osteosyntheses (0.99 mm), whereas AP-screw showed the smallest displacement (0.10 mm) during cyclic loading. The PA-screw technique showed a significant lower load to failure compared to all other osteosynthesis with the highest load in AP-screw osteosynthesis. The load for 100 µm displacement was the smallest in PA-screw with a significant difference to the AP-screw and one plate osteosynthesis.
CONCLUSION: Osteosynthesis of large coronoid shear fractures with two small-fragment screws from anterior allows stable fixation that is not inferior to anterior plate osteosynthesis and might be an alternative in specific fracture types. Posterior screw fixation was found as the weakest fixation method. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science study.
© 2020. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Coronoid fracture; Elbow; Elbow instability

Year:  2020        PMID: 33044707     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03621-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  11 in total

1.  The comparative stability of screw versus plate versus screw and plate coronoid fixation.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Budoff; D Nicole Meyers; Catherine G Ambrose
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Coronoid process and radial head as posterolateral rotatory stabilizers of the elbow.

Authors:  Alberto G Schneeberger; Michel M Sadowski; Hilaire A C Jacob
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  What Injury Mechanism and Patterns of Ligament Status Are Associated With Isolated Coronoid, Isolated Radial Head, and Combined Fractures?

Authors:  In Hyeok Rhyou; Ji-Ho Lee; Kyung Chul Kim; Kee Baek Ahn; Seong Cheol Moon; Hyeong Jin Kim; Jung Hyun Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Fixation of Regan-Morrey Type II Coronoid Fractures: A Comparison of Screws and Suture Lasso Technique for Resistance to Displacement.

Authors:  Nicholas P Iannuzzi; Adrian G Paez; Brent G Parks; Michael S Murphy
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Biomechanical comparison of headless antegrade screw versus retrograde cortical screw for coronoid fracture fixation.

Authors:  Onur Hapa; Ahmet Karakaşlı; Cemal Dinçer; Vadym Zhamilov; Mustafa Güvencer; Hasan Havitçioğlu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.511

6.  Transverse coronoid fracture: when does it have to be fixed?

Authors:  Robert U Hartzler; Manuel Llusa-Perez; Scott P Steinmann; Bernard F Morrey; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Management and outcome of 103 acute fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna.

Authors:  J E Adams; T L Hoskin; B F Morrey; S P Steinmann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-05

8.  Biomechanical analysis of the mechanism of elbow fracture-dislocations by compression force.

Authors:  Hirofumi Wake; Hiroyuki Hashizume; Keiichiro Nishida; Hajime Inoue; Noriyuki Nagayama
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 9.  Difficult elbow fractures: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Shawn W O'Driscoll; Jesse B Jupiter; Mark S Cohen; David Ring; Michael D McKee
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2003

10.  Optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid fractures.

Authors:  Jun-Gyu Moon; Mark E Zobitz; Kai-Nan An; Shawn W O'Driscoll
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Novel Suture-Preset Spring Plate System (SSPS) for Comminuted Coronoid Process Fracture in the Elbow.

Authors:  Ruijian Yan; Yifan Wu; Zhihui Xiang; Sihao Li; Yiying Qi; Hang Li; Chengyu Zhuang; Gang Feng
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.279

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.