Literature DB >> 24585321

Transverse coronoid fracture: when does it have to be fixed?

Robert U Hartzler1, Manuel Llusa-Perez, Scott P Steinmann, Bernard F Morrey, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After elbow fracture-dislocation, surgeons confront numerous treatment options in pursuing a stable joint for early motion. The relative contributions of the radial head and coronoid, in combination, to elbow stability have not been defined fully. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an approximately 50% transverse coronoid fracture and fixation in the setting of an intact or resected radial head on coronal (varus/valgus) and axial (internal and external rotational) laxity in (1) gravity varus stress; and (2) gravity valgus stress models.
METHODS: Kinematic data were collected on six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities tested with passive motion throughout the flexion arc under varus and valgus gravity stress with lateral collateral ligaments reconstructed. Testing included coronoid fracture and osteosynthesis with and without a radial head.
RESULTS: In the varus gravity stress model, fixation of the coronoid improved varus stability (fixed: 1.6° [95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.2], fractured: 5.6° [4.2-7.0], p < 0.001) and internal rotational stability (fixed: 1.8° [0.9-2.7], fractured: 5.4° [4.0-6.8], p < 0.001), but radial head fixation did not contribute to varus stability (intact head: 2.7° [1.3-4.1], resected head: 3.8° [2.3-5.3], p = 0.4) or rotational stability (intact: 2.7° [0.9-4.5], resected head: 3.9° [1.5-6.3], p = 0.4). With valgus stress, coronoid fixation improved valgus stability (fixed: 2.1° [1.0-3.1], fractured: 3.8° [1.8-5.8], p < 0.04) and external rotation stability (fixed: 0.8° [0.1-1.5], fractured: 2.1° [0.9-3.4], p < 0.04), but the radial head played a more important role in providing valgus stability (intact: 1.4° [0.8-2.0], resected head: 7.1° [3.5-10.7], p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Fixation of a 50% transverse coronoid fracture improves varus and internal rotatory laxity but is unlikely to meaningfully improve valgus or external rotation laxity. The radial head, on the other hand, is a stabilizer to resist valgus stress regardless of the status of the coronoid. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Determination as to whether it is necessary to fix a coronoid fracture should be based on the stability of the elbow when tested with a varus load. The elbow may potentially be stable with fractures involving less than 50% of the coronoid. Under all circumstances, the radial head should be fixed or replaced to ensure valgus external rotatory stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24585321      PMCID: PMC4048411          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3477-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  10 in total

1.  Coronoid process and radial head as posterolateral rotatory stabilizers of the elbow.

Authors:  Alberto G Schneeberger; Michel M Sadowski; Hilaire A C Jacob
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Stability of the elbow: osseous constraints.

Authors:  Bernard F Morrey; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 3.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.

Authors:  Ge Wu; Frans C T van der Helm; H E J DirkJan Veeger; Mohsen Makhsous; Peter Van Roy; Carolyn Anglin; Jochem Nagels; Andrew R Karduna; Kevin McQuade; Xuguang Wang; Frederick W Werner; Bryan Buchholz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Role of the coronoid process in varus osteoarticular stability of the elbow.

Authors:  Jason R Hull; John R Owen; Stephen E Fern; Jennifer S Wayne; N Douglas Boardman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Medial oblique compression fracture of the coronoid process of the ulna.

Authors:  Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Shawn W O'Driscoll; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  The contribution of the coronoid and radial head to the stability of the elbow.

Authors:  I H Jeon; J Sanchez-Sotelo; K Zhao; K N An; B M Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-01

7.  The role of the coronoid process in elbow stability. A biomechanical analysis of axial loading.

Authors:  R F Closkey; J R Goode; D Kirschenbaum; R P Cody
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The effect of suture fixation of type I coronoid fractures on the kinematics and stability of the elbow with and without medial collateral ligament repair.

Authors:  Daphne M Beingessner; Rebecca A Stacpoole; Cynthia E Dunning; James A Johnson; Graham J W King
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  The effect of anteromedial facet fractures of the coronoid and lateral collateral ligament injury on elbow stability and kinematics.

Authors:  J Whitcomb Pollock; Jamie Brownhill; Louis Ferreira; Colin P McDonald; James Johnson; Graham King
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna.

Authors:  W Regan; B Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.284

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Radial head reconstruction in elbow fracture-dislocation: monopolar or bipolar prosthesis?

Authors:  Robert U Hartzler; Bernard F Morrey; Scott P Steinmann; Manuel Llusa-Perez; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Terrible triad injury of the elbow: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Olivier Bozon; Sacha Chrosciany; Marie Loisel; Arthur Dellestable; Laura Gubbiotti; Raphaëlle Dumartinet-Gibaud; Elise Obrecht; Meagan Tibbo; Clara Sos; Pierre Laumonerie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 3.  Biomechanical Concepts for Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Christine E Schemitsch; Aaron Nauth; Milton Routt; Kenneth A Egol; Gillian E Cook; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Why the elbow? My experience and perspective.

Authors:  Bernard Morrey
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-06-09

5.  Hinged external fixation for Regan-Morrey type I and II fractures and fracture-dislocations.

Authors:  Alberto Castelli; Salvatore D'amico; Alberto Combi; Francesco Benazzo
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-02-13

6.  Complex elbow instability: surgical management of elbow fracture dislocations.

Authors:  Joaquín Sanchez-Sotelo; Mark Morrey
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

7.  Biomechanical comparison of screw osteosyntheses and anatomical plating for coronoid shear fractures of the ulna.

Authors:  Valentin Rausch; Birger Jettkant; Sebastian Lotzien; Thomas Rosteius; Eileen Mempel; Thomas A Schildhauer; Dominik Seybold; Jan Geßmann; Matthias Königshausen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Functional Outcome of Surgically Treated Isolated Coronoid Fractures With Elbow Dislocation in Young and Active Patients.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar; Praveen Sodavarapu; Karmesh Kumar; Aman Hooda; Deepak Neradi; Vikas Bachchal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-10-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.