Literature DB >> 33043557

Multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge in patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction on high-resolution manometry.

Amanda J Krause1, Hui Su2, Joseph R Triggs1,3, Claire Beveridge1,3, Alexandra J Baumann1, Erica Donnan1, John E Pandolfino1, Dustin A Carlson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) as defined by Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders (CCv3.0) encompasses a broad range of diagnoses, thus posing clinical challenges. Our aims were to evaluate multiple rapid swallow (MRS) and rapid drink challenge (RDC) during high-resolution manometry (HRM) to aid identifying clinically relevant EGJOO.
METHODS: Patients with a HRM diagnosis of EGJOO based on CCv3.0 that also completed MRS and RDC during HRM and barium esophagram were retrospectively identified. Radiographic EGJOO (RAD-EGJOO) was defined by either liquid barium retention or delayed passage of a barium tablet on barium esophagram. Thirty healthy asymptomatic controls that completed HRM were also included. MRS involved drinking 2 mL for 5 successive swallows. RDC involved rapid drinking of 200 mL liquid. Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and presence of panesophageal pressurization (PEP) during MRS and RDC were assessed. KEY
RESULTS: One hundred one patients, mean (SD) age 56 (16) years, were included; 32% had RAD-EGJOO, 68% did not. RAD-EGJOO patients more frequently had elevated (>12 mmHg) upright IRP (100%), MRS-IRP (56%), RDC-IRP (53%), and PEP during RDC (66%) than both controls [17%; 0%; 7%; 3%] and patients without RAD-EGJOO [83%; 35%; 39%; 41%] Having IRP >12 mmHg during both MRS and RDC was twice as likely to be associated with RAD-EGJOO (19%) than those without RAD-EGJOO (9%) among patients with upright IRP >12 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Adjunctive HRM maneuvers MRS and RDC appear to help identify clinically significant EGJOO. While future outcome studies are needed, comprehensive multimodal evaluation helps clarify relevance of EGJOO on HRM.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  achalasia; diagnostic tests; dysphagia; endoscopy; motility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33043557      PMCID: PMC7902305          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  33 in total

1.  Usefulness of low- and high-volume multiple rapid swallowing during high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Alessandra Elvevi; Aurelio Mauro; Delia Pugliese; Ivana Bravi; Andrea Tenca; Dario Consonni; Dario Conte; Roberto Penagini
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.088

2.  Normal values of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in healthy subjects: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  I Marin; D Cisternas; L Abrao; E Lemme; C Bilder; A Ditaranto; R Coello; A Hani; A M Leguizamo; A Meixueiro; J Remes-Troche; M A Zavala; A Ruiz de León; J Perez de la Serna; M A Valdovinos; J Serra
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Timed Barium Swallow: Diagnostic Role and Predictive Value in Untreated Achalasia, Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction, and Non-Achalasia Dysphagia.

Authors:  Wojciech Blonski; Ambuj Kumar; John Feldman; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.

Authors:  F B van Hoeij; A J P M Smout; A J Bredenoord
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Diagnostic yield of high-resolution manometry with a solid test meal for clinically relevant, symptomatic oesophageal motility disorders: serial diagnostic study.

Authors:  Daphne Ang; Benjamin Misselwitz; Michael Hollenstein; Kevin Knowles; Jeff Wright; Emily Tucker; Rami Sweis; Mark Fox
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-03

6.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Development and validation of the brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire.

Authors:  T H Taft; M Riehl; J B Sodikoff; P J Kahrilas; L Keefer; B Doerfler; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Functional and Anatomic Esophagogastic Junction Outflow Obstruction: Manometry, Timed Barium Esophagram Findings, and Treatment Outcomes.

Authors:  Steven B Clayton; Rupal Patel; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Vigor of peristalsis during multiple rapid swallows is inversely correlated with acid exposure time in patients with NERD.

Authors:  I Martinucci; E V Savarino; J E Pandolfino; S Russo; M Bellini; S Tolone; R Tutuian; S Roman; M Furnari; M Frazzoni; L Macchia; V Savarino; S Marchi; N de Bortoli
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  High-resolution impedance manometry parameters in the evaluation of esophageal function of non-obstructive dysphagia patients.

Authors:  Maartje J Singendonk; Zhiyue Lin; Charlotte Scheerens; Jan Tack; Dustin A Carlson; Taher I Omari; John E Pandolfino; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.960

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Dysphagia: Novel and Emerging Diagnostic Modalities.

Authors:  Amanda J Krause; Dustin A Carlson
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 2.  Esophageal Motility Disorders: Current Approach to Diagnostics and Therapeutics.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Rena Yadlapati; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 33.883

Review 3.  Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Peter J Kahrilas; Mark R Fox; Albert J Bredenoord; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; Arash Babaei; Ravinder K Mittal; Nathalie Rommel; Edoardo Savarino; Daniel Sifrim; André Smout; Michael F Vaezi; Frank Zerbib; Junichi Akiyama; Shobna Bhatia; Serhat Bor; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Daniel Cisternas; Charles Cock; Enrique Coss-Adame; Nicola de Bortoli; Claudia Defilippi; Ronnie Fass; Uday C Ghoshal; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Albis Hani; Geoffrey S Hebbard; Kee Wook Jung; Philip Katz; David A Katzka; Abraham Khan; Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Adriana Lazarescu; Johannes Lengliner; Sumeet K Mittal; Taher Omari; Moo In Park; Roberto Penagini; Daniel Pohl; Joel E Richter; Jordi Serra; Rami Sweis; Jan Tack; Roger P Tatum; Radu Tutuian; Marcelo F Vela; Reuben K Wong; Justin C Wu; Yinglian Xiao; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Evaluating esophageal motility beyond primary peristalsis: Assessing esophagogastric junction opening mechanics and secondary peristalsis in patients with normal manometry.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Alexandra J Baumann; Erica N Donnan; Amanda Krause; Wenjun Kou; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 5.  Chicago classification version 4.0© technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility.

Authors:  Mark R Fox; Rami Sweis; Rena Yadlapati; John Pandolfino; Albis Hani; Claudia Defilippi; Tack Jan; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.598

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.