Literature DB >> 33037690

Multi-hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales.

Anthony P Walker1, Abbey L Johnson1, Alistair Rogers2, Jeremiah Anderson2, Robert A Bridges3, Rosie A Fisher4,5, Dan Lu6, Daniel M Ricciuto1, Shawn P Serbin2, Ming Ye7.   

Abstract

Mechanistic photosynthesis models are at the heart of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) simulating the daily, monthly, annual and decadal rhythms of carbon assimilation (A). These models are founded on robust mathematical hypotheses that describe how A responds to changes in light and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Two predominant photosynthesis models are in common usage: Farquhar (FvCB) and Collatz (CBGB). However, a detailed quantitative comparison of these two models has never been undertaken. In this study, we unify the FvCB and CBGB models to a common parameter set and use novel multi-hypothesis methods (that account for both hypothesis and parameter variability) for process-level sensitivity analysis. These models represent three key biological processes: carboxylation, electron transport, triose phosphate use (TPU) and an additional model process: limiting-rate selection. Each of the four processes comprises 1-3 alternative hypotheses giving 12 possible individual models with a total of 14 parameters. To broaden inference, TBM simulations were run and novel, high-resolution photosynthesis measurements were made. We show that parameters associated with carboxylation are the most influential parameters but also reveal the surprising and marked dominance of the limiting-rate selection process (accounting for 57% of the variation in A vs. 22% for carboxylation). The limiting-rate selection assumption proposed by CBGB smooths the transition between limiting rates and always reduces A below the minimum of all potentially limiting rates, by up to 25%, effectively imposing a fourth limitation on A. Evaluation of the CBGB smoothing function in three TBMs demonstrated a reduction in global A by 4%-10%, equivalent to 50%-160% of current annual fossil fuel emissions. This analysis reveals a surprising and previously unquantified influence of a process that has been integral to many TBMs for decades, highlighting the value of multi-hypothesis methods.
© 2020 UT-Battelle, LLC. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon assimilation; high-resolution A-Ci curve; multi-hypothesis modelling; photosynthesis; process sensitivity analysis; terrestrial biosphere model

Year:  2020        PMID: 33037690      PMCID: PMC7894311          DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  19 in total

Review 1.  Vegetation dynamics--simulating responses to climatic change.

Authors:  F I Woodward; M R Lomas
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2004-08

2.  Acclimation and adaptation components of the temperature dependence of plant photosynthesis at the global scale.

Authors:  Dushan P Kumarathunge; Belinda E Medlyn; John E Drake; Mark G Tjoelker; Michael J Aspinwall; Michael Battaglia; Francisco J Cano; Kelsey R Carter; Molly A Cavaleri; Lucas A Cernusak; Jeffrey Q Chambers; Kristine Y Crous; Martin G De Kauwe; Dylan N Dillaway; Erwin Dreyer; David S Ellsworth; Oula Ghannoum; Qingmin Han; Kouki Hikosaka; Anna M Jensen; Jeff W G Kelly; Eric L Kruger; Lina M Mercado; Yusuke Onoda; Peter B Reich; Alistair Rogers; Martijn Slot; Nicholas G Smith; Lasse Tarvainen; David T Tissue; Henrique F Togashi; Edgard S Tribuzy; Johan Uddling; Angelica Vårhammar; Göran Wallin; Jeffrey M Warren; Danielle A Way
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 3.  The use and misuse of V(c,max) in Earth System Models.

Authors:  Alistair Rogers
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Optimal plant water economy.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley; Lawren Sack; Graham D Farquhar
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 7.228

5.  Phosphorus recycling in photorespiration maintains high photosynthetic capacity in woody species.

Authors:  David S Ellsworth; Kristine Y Crous; Hans Lambers; Julia Cooke
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 7.228

6.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C 3 species.

Authors:  G D Farquhar; S von Caemmerer; J A Berry
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  The coordination of leaf photosynthesis links C and N fluxes in C3 plant species.

Authors:  Vincent Maire; Pierre Martre; Jens Kattge; François Gastal; Gerd Esser; Sébastien Fontaine; Jean-François Soussana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The relationship of leaf photosynthetic traits - V cmax and J max - to leaf nitrogen, leaf phosphorus, and specific leaf area: a meta-analysis and modeling study.

Authors:  Anthony P Walker; Andrew P Beckerman; Lianhong Gu; Jens Kattge; Lucas A Cernusak; Tomas F Domingues; Joanna C Scales; Georg Wohlfahrt; Stan D Wullschleger; F Ian Woodward
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Multi-hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales.

Authors:  Anthony P Walker; Abbey L Johnson; Alistair Rogers; Jeremiah Anderson; Robert A Bridges; Rosie A Fisher; Dan Lu; Daniel M Ricciuto; Shawn P Serbin; Ming Ye
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  THE INFLUENCE OF LIGHT AND CARBON DIOXIDE ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS.

Authors:  E L Smith
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1937-07-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multi-hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales.

Authors:  Anthony P Walker; Abbey L Johnson; Alistair Rogers; Jeremiah Anderson; Robert A Bridges; Rosie A Fisher; Dan Lu; Daniel M Ricciuto; Shawn P Serbin; Ming Ye
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 10.863

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.