Literature DB >> 23564478

The use and misuse of V(c,max) in Earth System Models.

Alistair Rogers1.   

Abstract

Earth System Models (ESMs) aim to project global change. Central to this aim is the need to accurately model global carbon fluxes. Photosynthetic carbon dioxide assimilation by the terrestrial biosphere is the largest of these fluxes, and in many ESMs is represented by the Farquhar, von Caemmerer and Berry (FvCB) model of photosynthesis. The maximum rate of carboxylation by the enzyme Rubisco, commonly termed V c,max, is a key parameter in the FvCB model. This study investigated the derivation of the values of V c,max used to represent different plant functional types (PFTs) in ESMs. Four methods for estimating V c,max were identified; (1) an empirical or (2) mechanistic relationship was used to relate V c,max to leaf N content, (3) V c,max was estimated using an approach based on the optimization of photosynthesis and respiration or (4) calibration of a user-defined V c,max to obtain a target model output. Despite representing the same PFTs, the land model components of ESMs were parameterized with a wide range of values for V c,max (-46 to +77% of the PFT mean). In many cases, parameterization was based on limited data sets and poorly defined coefficients that were used to adjust model parameters and set PFT-specific values for V c,max. Examination of the models that linked leaf N mechanistically to V c,max identified potential changes to fixed parameters that collectively would decrease V c,max by 31% in C3 plants and 11% in C4 plants. Plant trait data bases are now available that offer an excellent opportunity for models to update PFT-specific parameters used to estimate V c,max. However, data for parameterizing some PFTs, particularly those in the Tropics and the Arctic are either highly variable or largely absent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23564478     DOI: 10.1007/s11120-013-9818-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photosynth Res        ISSN: 0166-8595            Impact factor:   3.573


  37 in total

Review 1.  Vegetation dynamics--simulating responses to climatic change.

Authors:  F I Woodward; M R Lomas
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2004-08

2.  Despite slow catalysis and confused substrate specificity, all ribulose bisphosphate carboxylases may be nearly perfectly optimized.

Authors:  Guillaume G B Tcherkez; Graham D Farquhar; T John Andrews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ribulose 1,5-diphosphate carboxylase from Hydrogenomonas eutropha and Hydrogenomonas facilis. II. Molecular weight, subunits, composition, and sulfhydryl groups.

Authors:  G D Kuehn; B A McFadden
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Possible explanation of the disparity between the in vitro and in vivo measurements of Rubisco activity: a study in loblolly pine grown in elevated pCO2.

Authors:  A Rogers; D S Ellsworth; S W Humphries
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Reliable estimation of biochemical parameters from C₃ leaf photosynthesis-intercellular carbon dioxide response curves.

Authors:  Lianhong Gu; Stephen G Pallardy; Kevin Tu; Beverly E Law; Stan D Wullschleger
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 6.  The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Alistair Rogers
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 7.  Rubisco: structure, regulatory interactions, and possibilities for a better enzyme.

Authors:  Robert J Spreitzer; Michael E Salvucci
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 8.  Structure and function of Rubisco.

Authors:  Inger Andersson; Anders Backlund
Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 4.270

9.  The biochemistry of Rubisco in Flaveria.

Authors:  David S Kubien; Spencer M Whitney; Paige V Moore; Linley K Jesson
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Net Exchange of CO2 in a Mid-Latitude Forest.

Authors:  S C Wofsy; M L Goulden; J W Munger; S M Fan; P S Bakwin; B C Daube; S L Bassow; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-28       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  26 in total

1.  Evolution and challenges of dynamic global vegetation models for some aspects of plant physiology and elevated atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  L F C Rezende; B C Arenque; S T Aidar; M S B Moura; C Von Randow; E Tourigny; R S C Menezes; J P H B Ometto
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Photosynthesis and the environment.

Authors:  Asaph B Cousins; Matt Johnson; Andrew D B Leakey
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Temperature responses of the Rubisco maximum carboxylase activity across domains of life: phylogenetic signals, trade-offs, and importance for carbon gain.

Authors:  J Galmés; M V Kapralov; L O Copolovici; C Hermida-Carrera; Ü Niinemets
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Rubisco Catalytic Properties and Temperature Response in Crops.

Authors:  Carmen Hermida-Carrera; Maxim V Kapralov; Jeroni Galmés
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Rapid evolution of leaf physiology in an introduced beach daisy.

Authors:  Claire R Brandenburger; Julia Cooke; William B Sherwin; Angela T Moles
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  A worldwide analysis of within-canopy variations in leaf structural, chemical and physiological traits across plant functional types.

Authors:  Ülo Niinemets; Trevor F Keenan; Lea Hallik
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Phylogenetic history of vascular plant metabolism revealed using a macroevolutionary common garden.

Authors:  Barbara M Neto-Bradley; Christopher D Muir; Jeannette Whitton; Matthew W Pennell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.530

8.  Global validation of a process-based model on vegetation gross primary production using eddy covariance observations.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Wenwen Cai; Jiangzhou Xia; Wenjie Dong; Guangsheng Zhou; Yang Chen; Haicheng Zhang; Wenping Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The relationship of leaf photosynthetic traits - V cmax and J max - to leaf nitrogen, leaf phosphorus, and specific leaf area: a meta-analysis and modeling study.

Authors:  Anthony P Walker; Andrew P Beckerman; Lianhong Gu; Jens Kattge; Lucas A Cernusak; Tomas F Domingues; Joanna C Scales; Georg Wohlfahrt; Stan D Wullschleger; F Ian Woodward
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 10.  Forest response and recovery following disturbance in upland forests of the Atlantic Coastal Plain.

Authors:  Karina V R Schäfer; Heidi J Renninger; Nicholas J Carlo; Dirk W Vanderklein
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.