Literature DB >> 33035393

Association of double product and pulse pressure with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the LURIC study.

Babak Yazdani1,2, Marcus E Kleber1,2, Gökhan Yücel1,2, Graciela E Delgado1,2,3, Urs Benck1, Bernd Krüger1,2, Winfried März1,2,4,5, Bernhard K Krämer1,2,3,6.   

Abstract

Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) are risk factors for cardiovascular mortality (CVM). Pulse pressure (PP) is considered as an easily available marker of vascular stiffness and the double product (DP) as a marker of cardiac workload. Therefore, we have examined the predictive value of PP and DP in the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health study, a monocentric cohort study of 3316 patients referred to coronary angiography. An increase of SBP or PP by 1mmHg increased the risk of CVM with hazard ratios of 1.009 (95% CI, 1.005-1.012) and 1.016 (1.012-1.020), respectively. Increasing DP by 100 mm Hg/min was associated with a 1.010 (1.007-1.013) higher risk of CVM. In patient subgroups with coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF), PP and DP predicted CVM better than SBP or MAP. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for sex, BMI, diabetes, eGFR, hazard ratios for CVM for z-standardized PP, DP, SBP, and HR were 1.20, 1.16, 1.12, and 1.14. After adding age to the multivariate analysis, only DP and HR remained significant. We provide evidence that PP and DP are powerful predictors of CVM and all-cause mortality in a CV medium- to high-risk population, especially in patients with CAD and HF. While DP proved to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality also in multivariate analysis, PP was no independent predictor in our cohort with widespread antihypertensive treatment (>85%). PP is associated with age, presence of diabetes, obesity, and impaired renal function.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac workload; coronary artery disease; double product; heart failure; hypertension; mortality; pulse pressure; rate pressure product; vascular stiffness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33035393      PMCID: PMC8030052          DOI: 10.1111/jch.14067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  24 in total

1.  Pulse pressure changes with six classes of antihypertensive agents in a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  W C Cushman; B J Materson; D W Williams; D J Reda
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  The association of rate pressure product (RPP) and myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) findings: a preliminary study.

Authors:  M Ansari; H Javadi; M Pourbehi; M Mogharrabi; M Rayzan; S Semnani; S Jallalat; A Amini; M Abbaszadeh; M Barekat; I Nabipour; M Assadi
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Non-invasive assessment of the age related changes in stiffness of major branches of the human arteries.

Authors:  T Kawasaki; S Sasayama; S Yagi; T Asakawa; T Hirai
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 10.787

4.  Higher pulse pressure and risk for cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension: The Campania Salute Network.

Authors:  Costantino Mancusi; Maria A Losi; Raffaele Izzo; Grazia Canciello; Maria V Carlino; Giovanni Albano; Nicola De Luca; Bruno Trimarco; Giovanni de Simone
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 7.804

5.  Pulse pressure and cardiovascular disease-related mortality: follow-up study of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT).

Authors:  Michael Domanski; Gary Mitchell; Marc Pfeffer; James D Neaton; James Norman; Kenneth Svendsen; Richard Grimm; Jerome Cohen; Jeremiah Stamler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Effects of blood pressure level on progression of diabetic nephropathy: results from the RENAAL study.

Authors:  George L Bakris; Matthew R Weir; Shahnaz Shanifar; Zhongxin Zhang; Janice Douglas; David J van Dijk; Barry M Brenner
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-07-14

Review 7.  Impact of pulse pressure on cerebrovascular events leading to age-related cognitive decline.

Authors:  Nathalie Thorin-Trescases; Olivia de Montgolfier; Anthony Pinçon; Adeline Raignault; Laurie Caland; Pauline Labbé; Eric Thorin
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Influence of resting heart rate on mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography (from the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health [LURIC] study).

Authors:  Bríain ó Hartaigh; Jos A Bosch; Stefan Pilz; Adrian Loerbroks; Marcus E Kleber; Tanja B Grammer; Joachim E Fischer; Bernhard O Boehm; G Neil Thomas; Winfried März
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Ten-year changes in ambulatory blood pressure: The prognostic value of ambulatory pulse pressure.

Authors:  Paolo Balietti; Francesco Spannella; Federico Giulietti; Giulia Rosettani; Beatrice Bernardi; Guido Cocci; Anna R Bonfigli; Riccardo Sarzani
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Association between preoperative pulse pressure and perioperative myocardial injury: an international observational cohort study of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  T E F Abbott; R M Pearse; R A Archbold; A Wragg; E Kam; T Ahmad; A W Khan; E Niebrzegowska; R N Rodseth; P J Devereaux; G L Ackland
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association of double product and pulse pressure with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the LURIC study.

Authors:  Babak Yazdani; Marcus E Kleber; Gökhan Yücel; Graciela E Delgado; Urs Benck; Bernd Krüger; Winfried März; Bernhard K Krämer
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.