Literature DB >> 28974076

Association between preoperative pulse pressure and perioperative myocardial injury: an international observational cohort study of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

T E F Abbott1, R M Pearse1, R A Archbold2, A Wragg2, E Kam1, T Ahmad1, A W Khan3, E Niebrzegowska2, R N Rodseth4, P J Devereaux5, G L Ackland1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of elevated blood pressure before non-cardiac surgery remains controversial. Pulse pressure is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular morbidity in the general population than systolic blood pressure alone. We hypothesized that preoperative pulse pressure was associated with perioperative myocardial injury.
METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the Vascular Events in Non-cardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION) international cohort study. Participants were aged ≥45 yr and undergoing non-cardiac surgery at 12 hospitals in eight countries. The primary outcome was myocardial injury, defined using serum troponin concentration, within 30 days after surgery. The sample was stratified into quintiles by preoperative pulse pressure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis explored associations between pulse pressure and myocardial injury. We accounted for potential confounding by systolic blood pressure and other co-morbidities known to be associated with postoperative cardiovascular complications.
RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and ninety-one of 15 057 (7.9%) patients sustained myocardial injury, which was more frequent amongst patients in the highest two preoperative pulse pressure quintiles {63-75 mm Hg, risk ratio (RR) 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.28], P =0.03; >75 mm Hg, RR 1.15 [95% CI: 1.03-1.29], P =0.02}. After adjustment for systolic blood pressure, preoperative pulse pressure remained the dominant predictor of myocardial injury (63-75 mm Hg, RR 1.20 [95% CI: 1.05-1.37], P <0.01; >75 mm Hg, RR 1.25 [95% CI: 1.06-1.48], P <0.01). Systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg was not associated with myocardial injury in the absence of pulse pressure >62 mm Hg (RR 0.67 [95% CI: 0.30-1.44], P =0.31).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative pulse pressure >62 mm Hg was associated with myocardial injury, independent of systolic blood pressure. Elevated pulse pressure may be a useful clinical sign to guide strategies to reduce perioperative myocardial injury.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cohort studies; high; hypertension; pulse pressure; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28974076     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  10 in total

1.  Preoperative systemic inflammation and perioperative myocardial injury: prospective observational multicentre cohort study of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  G L Ackland; T E F Abbott; D Cain; M R Edwards; P Sultan; S N Karmali; A J Fowler; J R Whittle; N J MacDonald; A Reyes; L Gallego Paredes; R C M Stephens; A Gutierrez Del Arroyo; S Woldman; R A Archbold; A Wragg; E Kam; T Ahmad; A W Khan; E Niebrzegowska; R M Pearse
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Association of double product and pulse pressure with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the LURIC study.

Authors:  Babak Yazdani; Marcus E Kleber; Gökhan Yücel; Graciela E Delgado; Urs Benck; Bernd Krüger; Winfried März; Bernhard K Krämer
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Perioperative factors associated with postoperative morbidity after emergency laparotomy: a retrospective analysis in a university teaching hospital.

Authors:  M Ahmed; E Garry; A Moynihan; W Rehman; J Griffin; D J Buggy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The burden of perioperative hypertension/hypotension: A systematic review.

Authors:  Irene Lizano-Díez; Stephen Poteet; Adrià Burniol-Garcia; Mónica Cerezales
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Prospective International Multicentre Cohort Study of Intraoperative Heart Rate and Systolic Blood Pressure and Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery: Results of the VISION Study.

Authors:  Tom E F Abbott; Rupert M Pearse; R Andrew Archbold; Tahania Ahmad; Edyta Niebrzegowska; Andrew Wragg; Reitze N Rodseth; Philip J Devereaux; Gareth L Ackland
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Elevated preoperative heart rate associated with increased risk of cardiopulmonary complications after resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  Danxia Fu; Chaoshuang Wu; Xiaoyu Li; Junping Chen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Perioperative myocardial infarction: diagnostic clues and prevention.

Authors:  Larry Nichols
Journal:  Autops Case Rep       Date:  2018-07-30

8.  Cardiac vagal dysfunction and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery: a planned secondary analysis of the measurement of Exercise Tolerance before surgery study.

Authors:  T E F Abbott; R M Pearse; B H Cuthbertson; D N Wijeysundera; G L Ackland
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Can routine perioperative haemodynamic parameters predict postoperative morbidity after major surgery?

Authors:  Jean-Francois Bonnet; Eleanor Buggy; Barbara Cusack; Aislinn Sherwin; Tom Wall; Maria Fitzgibbon; Donal J Buggy
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-03-24

10.  Perioperative management of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers: a survey of perioperative medicine practitioners.

Authors:  Sophie L M Walker; Tom E F Abbott; Katherine Brown; Rupert M Pearse; Gareth L Ackland
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.