Literature DB >> 11641316

Pulse pressure changes with six classes of antihypertensive agents in a randomized, controlled trial.

W C Cushman1, B J Materson, D W Williams, D J Reda.   

Abstract

Pulse pressure has been more strongly associated with cardiovascular outcomes, especially myocardial infarction and heart failure, than has systolic, diastolic, or mean arterial pressure in a variety of populations. Little is known, however, of the comparative effects of various classes of antihypertensive agents on pulse pressure. In retrospective analyses of the Veterans Affairs Single-Drug Therapy for Hypertension Study, we compared changes in pulse pressure with 6 classes of antihypertensive agents: 1292 men with diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 109 mm Hg on placebo were randomized to receive hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, captopril, clonidine, diltiazem, prazosin, or placebo. Drug doses were titrated to achieve a goal diastolic blood pressure of <90 mm Hg during a 4- to 8-week medication titration phase. Pulse pressure change (placebo subtracted) was assessed from baseline to the end of the 3-month titration and 1-year maintenance. Mean baseline systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures were 152, 99, and 53 mm Hg, respectively. Reductions in pulse pressure during titration were greater (P<0.001) with clonidine (6.7 mm Hg) and hydrochlorothiazide (6.2 mm Hg) than with captopril (2.5 mm Hg), diltiazem (1.6 mm Hg), and atenolol (1.4 mm Hg); reduction with prazosin (3.9 mm Hg) was similar to all but clonidine. After 1 year, pulse pressure was reduced significantly more (P<0.001) with hydrochlorothiazide (8.6 mm Hg) than with captopril and atenolol (4.1 mm Hg with both); clonidine (6.3 mm Hg), diltiazem (5.5 mm Hg), and prazosin (5.0 mm Hg) were intermediate. These data show that classes of antihypertensive agents differ in their ability to reduce pulse pressure. Whether these differences affect rates of cardiovascular events remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11641316     DOI: 10.1161/hy1001.096212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  15 in total

Review 1.  Why beta-blockers are not cardioprotective in elderly patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Ehud Grossman; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Pulse pressure and adverse outcomes in women: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE).

Authors:  R David Anderson; B Clay Sizemore; Genevieve M Barrow; B Delia Johnson; C Noel Bairey Merz; George Sopko; Gregory O von Mering; Eileen M Handberg; Wilmer W Nichols; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Reduced density gradient as a novel approach for estimating QSAR descriptors, and its application to 1, 4-dihydropyridine derivatives with potential antihypertensive effects.

Authors:  Christiaan Jardínez; Alberto Vela; Julián Cruz-Borbolla; Rodrigo J Alvarez-Mendez; José G Alvarado-Rodríguez
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Impact of aortic root size on left ventricular afterload and stroke volume.

Authors:  Anders Sahlén; Nadira Hamid; Mohammed Rizwan Amanullah; Jiang Ming Fam; Khung Keong Yeo; Yee How Lau; Carolyn S P Lam; Zee Pin Ding
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Pulse pressure and subclinical cardiovascular disease in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Ginger J Winston; Walter Palmas; Joao Lima; Joseph F Polak; Alain G Bertoni; Gregory Burke; John Eng; Rebecca Gottesman; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 6.  The J-curve in hypertension.

Authors:  John Cruickshank
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Increased preoperative pulse pressure predicts procedural complications and mortality in patients who undergo tibial interventions for critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Sara L Zettervall; Dominique B Buck; Jeremy D Darling; Vanessa Lee; Marc L Schermerhorn; Raul J Guzman
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  Advanced glycation endproduct crosslinking in the cardiovascular system: potential therapeutic target for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Susan J Zieman; David A Kass
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Sex-specific effects of ACE I/D and AGT-M235T on pulse pressure: the HyperGEN Study.

Authors:  Amy I Lynch; Donna K Arnett; James S Pankow; Michael B Miller; Kari E North; John H Eckfeldt; Steven C Hunt; Dabeeru C Rao; Luc Djoussé
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Abnormal Pulsatile Hemodynamics in Hypertensive Patients With Normalized 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure by Combination Therapy of Three or More Antihypertensive Agents.

Authors:  Dai-Yin Lu; Li-Kai You; Shih-Hsien Sung; Hao-Min Cheng; Shing-Jong Lin; Fu-Tien Chiang; Chen-Huan Chen; Wen-Chung Yu
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.