Literature DB >> 33031563

Patient-specific in vitro testing for evaluating TAVR clinical performance-A complementary approach to current ISO standard testing.

Brandon J Kovarovic1, Oren M Rotman1, Puja Parikh2, Marvin J Slepian3,4, Danny Bluestein1.   

Abstract

Following in vitro tests established for surgical prosthetic heart valves, transcatheter aortic valves (TAV) are similarly tested in idealized geometries-excluding effects that may hamper TAVR performance in situ. Testing in vitro in pulse duplicator systems that incorporated patient-specific replicas would enhance the testing veracity by bringing it closer to the clinical scenario. To that end we compare TAV hemodynamic performance tested in idealized geometries according to the ISO standard (baseline performance) to that obtained by testing the TAVs following deployment in patient-specific replicas. Balloon-expandable (n = 2) and self-expandable (n = 3) TAVs were tested in an idealized geometry in mock-circulation system (following ISO 5840-3 guidelines) and compared to the measurements in a dedicated mock-circulation system adapted for the five patient-specific replicas. Patient-specific deployments resulted in a decline in performance as compared to the baseline idealized testing, as well as a variation in performance that depended on the design features of each device that was further correlated with the radial expansion and eccentricity of the deployed TAV stent (obtained with CT-scans of the deployed valves). By excluding the deployment effects in irregular geometries, the current idealized ISO testing is limited to characterize the baseline device performance. Utilizing patient-specific anatomic contours provides performance indicators under more stringent conditions likely encountered in vivo. It has the potential to enhance testing and development complementary to the ISO standard, for improved TAV safety and effectiveness.
© 2020 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ISO 5840; calcific aortic valve disease; in vitro hemodynamic testing; patient-specific testing; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33031563      PMCID: PMC8068093          DOI: 10.1111/aor.13841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  25 in total

1.  The bioprosthetic versus mechanical valve debate: Unwinnable and increasingly irrelevant?

Authors:  Joanna Chikwe
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Aortic Stenosis: Then and Now.

Authors:  Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Principles of TAVR valve design, modelling, and testing.

Authors:  Oren M Rotman; Matteo Bianchi; Ram P Ghosh; Brandon Kovarovic; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Patient-specific simulation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of deployment options on paravalvular leakage.

Authors:  Matteo Bianchi; Gil Marom; Ram P Ghosh; Oren M Rotman; Puja Parikh; Luis Gruberg; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2018-11-20

5.  Body surface area as a predictor of aortic and pulmonary valve diameter.

Authors:  S B Capps; R C Elkins; D M Fronk
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Ron Waksman; Toby Rogers; Rebecca Torguson; Paul Gordon; Afshin Ehsan; Sean R Wilson; John Goncalves; Robert Levitt; Chiwon Hahn; Puja Parikh; Thomas Bilfinger; David Butzel; Scott Buchanan; Nicholas Hanna; Robert Garrett; Federico Asch; Gaby Weissman; Itsik Ben-Dor; Christian Shults; Roshni Bastian; Paige E Craig; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Paul Kolm; Quan Zou; Lowell F Satler; Paul J Corso
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Aortic valve calcification as an incidental finding at CT of the elderly: severity and location as predictors of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Franklin Liu; Courtney A Coursey; Cairistine Grahame-Clarke; Robert R Sciacca; Anna Rozenshtein; Shunichi Homma; John H M Austin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Assessment of paravalvular regurgitation following TAVR: a proposal of unifying grading scheme.

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Rebecca T Hahn; Neil J Weissman; Mark J Monaghan
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03

9.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.

Authors:  Howard C Herrmann; Samuel A Daneshvar; Gregg C Fonarow; Amanda Stebbins; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Nimesh D Desai; David J Malenka; Vinod H Thourani; Jennifer Rymer; Andrzej S Kosinski
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-23       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Left Ventricular Myocardial Mechanics After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Frédéric Poulin; Teerapat Yingchoncharoen; William M Wilson; Eric M Horlick; Philippe Généreux; E Murat Tuzcu; William Stewart; Mark D Osten; Anna Woo; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  3 in total

1.  Validating In Silico and In Vitro Patient-Specific Structural and Flow Models with Transcatheter Bicuspid Aortic Valve Replacement Procedure.

Authors:  Salwa B Anam; Brandon J Kovarovic; Ram P Ghosh; Matteo Bianchi; Ashraf Hamdan; Rami Haj-Ali; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.495

2.  Visions of TAVR Future: Development and Optimization of a Second Generation Novel Polymeric TAVR.

Authors:  Brandon Kovarovic; Ryan Helbock; Kyle Baylous; Oren M Rotman; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.899

3.  A Robot Mimicking Heart Motions: An Ex-Vivo Test Approach for Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Rolf Vogel; Andreas Haeberlin; Adrian Zurbuchen; Aloïs Pfenniger; Sammy Omari; Tobias Reichlin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.305

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.