Literature DB >> 35318480

Visions of TAVR Future: Development and Optimization of a Second Generation Novel Polymeric TAVR.

Brandon Kovarovic1, Ryan Helbock1, Kyle Baylous1, Oren M Rotman1, Marvin J Slepian2, Danny Bluestein1.   

Abstract

Tissue-based transcatheter aortic valve (AV) replacement (TAVR) devices have been a breakthrough approach for treating aortic valve stenosis. However, with the expansion of TAVR to younger and lower risk patients, issues of long-term durability and thrombosis persist. Recent advances in polymeric valve technology facilitate designing more durable valves with minimal in vivo adverse reactions. We introduce our second-generation polymeric transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) device, designed and optimized to address these issues. We present the optimization process of the device, wherein each aspect of device deployment and functionality was optimized for performance, including unique considerations of polymeric technologies for reducing the volume of the polymer material for lower crimped delivery profiles. The stent frame was optimized to generate larger radial forces with lower material volumes, securing robust deployment and anchoring. The leaflet shape, combined with varying leaflets thickness, was optimized for reducing the flexural cyclic stresses and the valve's hydrodynamics. Our first-generation polymeric device already demonstrated that its hydrodynamic performance meets and exceeds tissue devices for both ISO standard and patient-specific in vitro scenarios. The valve already reached 900 × 106 cycles of accelerated durability testing, equivalent to over 20 years in a patient. The optimization framework and technology led to the second generation of polymeric TAV design- currently undergoing in vitro hydrodynamic testing and following in vivo animal trials. As TAVR use is rapidly expanding, our rigorous bio-engineering optimization methodology and advanced polymer technology serve to establish polymeric TAV technology as a viable alternative to the challenges facing existing tissue-based TAV technology.
Copyright © 2022 by ASME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35318480      PMCID: PMC8990719          DOI: 10.1115/1.4054149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   1.899


  35 in total

1.  Durability Data for Bioprosthetic Surgical Aortic Valve: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Benish Fatima; Divyanshu Mohananey; Fazal W Khan; Yash Jobanputra; Ramyashree Tummala; Kinjal Banerjee; Amar Krishnaswamy; Stephanie Mick; E Murat Tuzcu; Eugene Blackstone; Lars Svensson; Samir Kapadia
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Biological Valves in Younger Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: A Word of Caution.

Authors:  Norman Briffa; John B Chambers
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J Ross; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Design, development, testing at ISO standards and in vivo feasibility study of a novel polymeric heart valve prosthesis.

Authors:  Joanna R Stasiak; Marta Serrani; Eugenia Biral; James V Taylor; Azfar G Zaman; Samantha Jones; Thomas Ness; Francesco De Gaetano; Maria Laura Costantino; Vito D Bruno; Saadeh Suleiman; Raimondo Ascione; Geoff D Moggridge
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.843

Review 5.  Polymeric heart valves for surgical implantation, catheter-based technologies and heart assist devices.

Authors:  Deon Bezuidenhout; David F Williams; Peter Zilla
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Toward optimization of a novel trileaflet polymeric prosthetic heart valve via device thrombogenicity emulation.

Authors:  Thomas E Claiborne; Michalis Xenos; Jawaad Sheriff; Wei-Che Chiu; Joao Soares; Yared Alemu; Shikha Gupta; Stefan Judex; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Daniel Alejandro Lerman; Sai Prasad; Nasri Alotti
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2015

8.  Patient-specific in vitro testing for evaluating TAVR clinical performance-A complementary approach to current ISO standard testing.

Authors:  Brandon J Kovarovic; Oren M Rotman; Puja Parikh; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.094

9.  Device Thrombogenicity Emulation: An In Silico Predictor of In Vitro and In Vivo Ventricular Assist Device Thrombogenicity.

Authors:  Wei Che Chiu; Phat L Tran; Zain Khalpey; Eric Lee; Yi-Ren Woo; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Pressure gradient vs. flow relationships to characterize the physiology of a severely stenotic aortic valve before and after transcatheter valve implantation.

Authors:  Nils P Johnson; Jo M Zelis; Pim A L Tonino; Patrick Houthuizen; R Arthur Bouwman; Guus R G Brueren; Daniel T Johnson; Jacques J Koolen; Hendrikus H M Korsten; Inge F Wijnbergen; Frederik M Zimmermann; Richard L Kirkeeide; Nico H J Pijls; K Lance Gould
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Designing a Novel Asymmetric Transcatheter Aortic Valve for Stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valves Using Patient-Specific Computational Modeling.

Authors:  Ryan T Helbock; Salwa B Anam; Brandon J Kovarovic; Marvin J Slepian; Ashraf Hamdan; Rami Haj-Ali; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.219

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.