BACKGROUND: The cause of most fetal anomalies is not determined prenatally. Exome sequencing has transformed genetic diagnosis after birth, but its usefulness for prenatal diagnosis is still emerging. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF), a fetal abnormality that is often lethal, has numerous genetic causes; the extent to which exome sequencing can aid in its diagnosis is unclear. METHODS: We evaluated a series of 127 consecutive unexplained cases of NIHF that were defined by the presence of fetal ascites, pleural or pericardial effusions, skin edema, cystic hygroma, increased nuchal translucency, or a combination of these conditions. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for detecting genetic variants that were classified as either pathogenic or likely pathogenic according to the criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of cases associated with specific genetic disorders and the proportion of variants that were inherited. RESULTS: In 37 of the 127 cases (29%), we identified diagnostic genetic variants, including those for disorders affecting the RAS-MAPK cell-signaling pathway (known as RASopathies) (30% of the genetic diagnoses); inborn errors of metabolism and musculoskeletal disorders (11% each); lymphatic, neurodevelopmental, cardiovascular, and hematologic disorders (8% each); and others. Prognoses ranged from a relatively mild outcome to death during the perinatal period. Overall, 68% of the cases (25 of 37) with diagnostic variants were autosomal dominant (of which 12% were inherited and 88% were de novo), 27% (10 of 37) were autosomal recessive (of which 95% were inherited and 5% were de novo), 1 was inherited X-linked recessive, and 1 was of uncertain inheritance. We identified potentially diagnostic variants in an additional 12 cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this large case series of 127 fetuses with unexplained NIHF, we identified a diagnostic genetic variant in approximately one third of the cases. (Funded by the UCSF Center for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03412760.).
BACKGROUND: The cause of most fetal anomalies is not determined prenatally. Exome sequencing has transformed genetic diagnosis after birth, but its usefulness for prenatal diagnosis is still emerging. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF), a fetal abnormality that is often lethal, has numerous genetic causes; the extent to which exome sequencing can aid in its diagnosis is unclear. METHODS: We evaluated a series of 127 consecutive unexplained cases of NIHF that were defined by the presence of fetal ascites, pleural or pericardial effusions, skin edema, cystic hygroma, increased nuchal translucency, or a combination of these conditions. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for detecting genetic variants that were classified as either pathogenic or likely pathogenic according to the criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of cases associated with specific genetic disorders and the proportion of variants that were inherited. RESULTS: In 37 of the 127 cases (29%), we identified diagnostic genetic variants, including those for disorders affecting the RAS-MAPK cell-signaling pathway (known as RASopathies) (30% of the genetic diagnoses); inborn errors of metabolism and musculoskeletal disorders (11% each); lymphatic, neurodevelopmental, cardiovascular, and hematologic disorders (8% each); and others. Prognoses ranged from a relatively mild outcome to death during the perinatal period. Overall, 68% of the cases (25 of 37) with diagnostic variants were autosomal dominant (of which 12% were inherited and 88% were de novo), 27% (10 of 37) were autosomal recessive (of which 95% were inherited and 5% were de novo), 1 was inherited X-linked recessive, and 1 was of uncertain inheritance. We identified potentially diagnostic variants in an additional 12 cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this large case series of 127 fetuses with unexplained NIHF, we identified a diagnostic genetic variant in approximately one third of the cases. (Funded by the UCSF Center for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03412760.).
Authors: Carlo Bellini; Gloria Donarini; Dario Paladini; Maria Grazia Calevo; Tommaso Bellini; Luca A Ramenghi; Raoul C Hennekam Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Martina A Steurer; Shabnam Peyvandi; Rebecca J Baer; Tippi MacKenzie; Ben C Li; Mary E Norton; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Anita J Moon-Grady Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Rachael T Overcash; Christopher K Gibu; Marilyn C Jones; Gladys A Ramos; Tara S Andreasen Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Ronald J Wapner; Christa Lese Martin; Brynn Levy; Blake C Ballif; Christine M Eng; Julia M Zachary; Melissa Savage; Lawrence D Platt; Daniel Saltzman; William A Grobman; Susan Klugman; Thomas Scholl; Joe Leigh Simpson; Kimberly McCall; Vimla S Aggarwal; Brian Bunke; Odelia Nahum; Ankita Patel; Allen N Lamb; Elizabeth A Thom; Arthur L Beaudet; David H Ledbetter; Lisa G Shaffer; Laird Jackson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Christopher Derderian; Shivika Trivedi; Jody Farrell; Roberta L Keller; Larry Rand; Ruth Goldstein; Vickie A Feldstein; Shinjiro Hirose; Tippi C MacKenzie Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Teresa N Sparks; Kao Thao; Billie R Lianoglou; Nina M Boe; Kari G Bruce; Ilina Datkhaeva; Nancy T Field; Victoria M Fratto; Jennifer Jolley; Louise C Laurent; Anne H Mardy; Aisling M Murphy; Emily Ngan; Naseem Rangwala; Catherine A M Rottkamp; Lisa Wilson; Erica Wu; Cherry C Uy; Priscila Valdez Lopez; Mary E Norton Journal: Genet Med Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Bruce D Gelb; Hélène Cavé; Mitchell W Dillon; Karen W Gripp; Jennifer A Lee; Heather Mason-Suares; Katherine A Rauen; Bradley Williams; Martin Zenker; Lisa M Vincent Journal: Genet Med Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Jenny Lord; Dominic J McMullan; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Gabriele Rinck; Susan J Hamilton; Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones; Elena Prigmore; Rebecca Keelagher; Sunayna K Best; Georgina K Carey; Rhiannon Mellis; Sarah Robart; Ian R Berry; Kate E Chandler; Deirdre Cilliers; Lara Cresswell; Sandra L Edwards; Carol Gardiner; Alex Henderson; Simon T Holden; Tessa Homfray; Tracy Lester; Rebecca A Lewis; Ruth Newbury-Ecob; Katrina Prescott; Oliver W Quarrell; Simon C Ramsden; Eileen Roberts; Dagmar Tapon; Madeleine J Tooley; Pradeep C Vasudevan; Astrid P Weber; Diana G Wellesley; Paul Westwood; Helen White; Michael Parker; Denise Williams; Lucy Jenkins; Richard H Scott; Mark D Kilby; Lyn S Chitty; Matthew E Hurles; Eamonn R Maher Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Akos Herzeg; Graça Almeida-Porada; R Alta Charo; Anna L David; Juan Gonzalez-Velez; Nalin Gupta; Larissa Lapteva; Billie Lianoglou; William Peranteau; Christopher Porada; Stephan J Sanders; Teresa N Sparks; David H Stitelman; Evi Struble; Charlotte J Sumner; Tippi C MacKenzie Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Kate Swanson; Mary E Norton; Billie R Lianoglou; Angie C Jelin; Ugur Hodoglugil; Jessica Van Ziffle; Patrick Devine; Teresa N Sparks Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2022-07-03 Impact factor: 3.242
Authors: Mary E Norton; Jessica Van Ziffle; Billie R Lianoglou; Ugur Hodoglugil; W Patrick Devine; Teresa N Sparks Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Kate Swanson; Teresa N Sparks; Billie R Lianoglou; Flavia Chen; Sarah Downum; Sachi Patel; Shannon Rego; Tiffany Yip; Jessica Van Ziffle; Barbara A Koenig; Anne M Slavotinek; Mary E Norton Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 3.242
Authors: F Mone; R Y Eberhardt; M E Hurles; D J Mcmullan; E R Maher; J Lord; L S Chitty; E Dempsey; T Homfray; J L Giordano; R J Wapner; L Sun; T N Sparks; M E Norton; M D Kilby Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2021-10 Impact factor: 8.678