| Literature DB >> 36106778 |
Akos Herzeg1,2,3, Graça Almeida-Porada4,5, R Alta Charo6, Anna L David7,8, Juan Gonzalez-Velez1,9, Nalin Gupta10,11,12, Larissa Lapteva13, Billie Lianoglou1,2, William Peranteau14, Christopher Porada4,5, Stephan J Sanders1,15,16,17, Teresa N Sparks1,9, David H Stitelman18, Evi Struble13, Charlotte J Sumner19, Tippi C MacKenzie1,2,9,12.
Abstract
We are living in a golden age of medicine in which the availability of prenatal diagnosis, fetal therapy, and gene therapy/editing make it theoretically possible to repair almost any defect in the genetic code. Furthermore, the ability to diagnose genetic disorders before birth and the presence of established surgical techniques enable these therapies to be delivered safely to the fetus. Prenatal therapies are generally used in the second or early third trimester for severe, life-threatening disorders for which there is a clear rationale for intervening before birth. While there has been promising work for prenatal gene therapy in preclinical models, the path to a clinical prenatal gene therapy approach is complex. We recently held a conference with the University of California, San Francisco-Stanford Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation, researchers, patient advocates, regulatory (members of the Food and Drug Administration), and other stakeholders to review the scientific background and rationale for prenatal somatic cell gene therapy for severe monogenic diseases and initiate a dialogue toward a safe regulatory path for phase 1 clinical trials. This review represents a summary of the considerations and discussions from these conversations.Entities:
Keywords: drug development; fetal medicine; immunopharmacology; neurology; pediatrics; perinatology; pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics; rare diseases; regulatory/scientific affairs; women's health
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36106778 PMCID: PMC9547535 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Pharmacol ISSN: 0091-2700 Impact factor: 2.860