Literature DB >> 35723972

The utility of pathologic examination and comprehensive phenotyping for accurate diagnosis with perinatal exome sequencing.

Kate Swanson1,2, Mary E Norton1,2,3,4, Billie R Lianoglou3, Angie C Jelin5, Ugur Hodoglugil6, Jessica Van Ziffle6, Patrick Devine6, Teresa N Sparks1,3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Exome sequencing (ES) offers the ability to assess for variants in thousands of genes and is particularly useful in the setting of fetal anomalies. However, the ES pipeline relies on a thorough understanding of an individual patient's phenotype, which may be limited in the prenatal setting. Additional pathology evaluations in the pre- and postnatal settings can add phenotypic details important for clearly establishing and characterizing a diagnosis.
METHODS: This is a case series of prenatal ES performed at our institution in which pathology evaluations, including autopsy, dysmorphology examination, histology, and peripheral blood smear, augmented the understanding of the fetal phenotype. ES was performed at our institution and a multidisciplinary panel reviewed and classified the variants for each case.
RESULTS: We present four cases wherein pathology evaluations were beneficial for supporting a perinatal diagnosis identified with ES. In each of these cases, pathology findings provided additional data to support a more complete understanding of the relationship between the perinatal phenotype and variants identified with ES.
CONCLUSION: These cases highlight challenges of perinatal ES related to incomplete prenatal phenotyping, demonstrate the utility of pathology evaluations to support diagnoses identified with ES, and further characterize the disease manifestations of specific genetic variants.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35723972      PMCID: PMC9531346          DOI: 10.1002/pd.6197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.242


  21 in total

1.  Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Slavé Petrovski; Vimla Aggarwal; Jessica L Giordano; Melissa Stosic; Karen Wou; Louise Bier; Erica Spiegel; Kelly Brennan; Nicholas Stong; Vaidehi Jobanputra; Zhong Ren; Xiaolin Zhu; Caroline Mebane; Odelia Nahum; Quanli Wang; Sitharthan Kamalakaran; Colin Malone; Kwame Anyane-Yeboa; Russell Miller; Brynn Levy; David B Goldstein; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul D Griffiths; Michael Bradburn; Michael J Campbell; Cindy L Cooper; Ruth Graham; Deborah Jarvis; Mark D Kilby; Gerald Mason; Cara Mooney; Stephen C Robson; Allan Wailoo
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Yaping Yang; Donna M Muzny; Jeffrey G Reid; Matthew N Bainbridge; Alecia Willis; Patricia A Ward; Alicia Braxton; Joke Beuten; Fan Xia; Zhiyv Niu; Matthew Hardison; Richard Person; Mir Reza Bekheirnia; Magalie S Leduc; Amelia Kirby; Peter Pham; Jennifer Scull; Min Wang; Yan Ding; Sharon E Plon; James R Lupski; Arthur L Beaudet; Richard A Gibbs; Christine M Eng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clinical diagnostics in human genetics with semantic similarity searches in ontologies.

Authors:  Sebastian Köhler; Marcel H Schulz; Peter Krawitz; Sebastian Bauer; Sandra Dölken; Claus E Ott; Christine Mundlos; Denise Horn; Stefan Mundlos; Peter N Robinson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing.

Authors:  Sunayna Best; Karen Wou; Neeta Vora; Ignatia B Van der Veyver; Ronald Wapner; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Interpretable Clinical Genomics with a Likelihood Ratio Paradigm.

Authors:  Peter N Robinson; Vida Ravanmehr; Julius O B Jacobsen; Daniel Danis; Xingmin Aaron Zhang; Leigh C Carmody; Michael A Gargano; Courtney L Thaxton; Guy Karlebach; Justin Reese; Manuel Holtgrewe; Sebastian Köhler; Julie A McMurry; Melissa A Haendel; Damian Smedley
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Clinical phenotype-based gene prioritization: an initial study using semantic similarity and the human phenotype ontology.

Authors:  Aaron J Masino; Elizabeth T Dechene; Matthew C Dulik; Alisha Wilkens; Nancy B Spinner; Ian D Krantz; Jeffrey W Pennington; Peter N Robinson; Peter S White
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  A Cross-Sectional Study of Nemaline Myopathy.

Authors:  Kimberly Amburgey; Meryl Acker; Samia Saeed; Reshma Amin; Alan H Beggs; Carsten G Bönnemann; Michael Brudno; Andrei Constantinescu; Jahannaz Dastgir; Mamadou Diallo; Casie A Genetti; Michael Glueck; Stacy Hewson; Courtney Hum; Minal S Jain; Michael W Lawlor; Oscar H Meyer; Leslie Nelson; Nicole Sultanum; Faiza Syed; Tuyen Tran; Ching H Wang; James J Dowling
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  An approach to integrating exome sequencing for fetal structural anomalies into clinical practice.

Authors:  Neeta L Vora; Kelly Gilmore; Alicia Brandt; Chelsea Gustafson; Natasha Strande; Lori Ramkissoon; Emily Hardisty; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Kirk Wilhelmsen; Phillips Owen; Karen E Weck; Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Powell; Bradford C Powell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Second-trimester fetal autopsy: A morphological study with prenatal USG correlations and clinical implications.

Authors:  Chaitra Venkataswamy; Umamaheswari Gurusamy; S Vidhya Lakshmi
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.