| Literature DB >> 33016889 |
Xiaopeng Yao1,2, Xinqiao Huang3, Chunmei Yang3, Anbin Hu1,2, Guangjin Zhou4, Jianbo Lei1,5, Jian Shu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiomics can improve the accuracy of traditional image diagnosis to evaluate extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC); however, this is limited by variations across radiologists, subjective evaluation, and restricted data. A radiomics-based particle swarm optimization and support vector machine (PSO-SVM) model may provide a more accurate auxiliary diagnosis for assessing differentiation degree (DD) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) of ECC.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; PSO-SVM algorithm; algorithm; cancer; differentiation degree; extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; lymph; lymph node metastases; magnetic resonance imaging; oncology; radiomics; radiomics feature
Year: 2020 PMID: 33016889 PMCID: PMC7573697 DOI: 10.2196/23578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Med Inform
Figure 1Flow diagram of patient cohort selection (n=110). DD: differentiation degree; ECC: extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; LNM: lymph node metastases; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.
The acquisition parameters of the abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol.
| Acquisition parameters | Imaging protocol | |||
|
| T1WIa | T2WIb | DWIc | ADCd |
| Repetition time (milliseconds) | 300 | 2610 | 2103 | N/Ae |
| Echo time (milliseconds) | 14 | 70 | 70 | N/A |
| Flip angle (degrees) | 10 | 90 | 90 | N/A |
| Field of view (mm×mm) | 365×305 | 280×305 | 375×305 | N/A |
| Matrix size (mm×mm) | 204×154 | 176×20 1 | 128×256 | N/A |
| Slice thickness (mm)/gap(mm) | 7/1 | 7/1 | 7/1 | N/A |
| Slices (mm) | 24 | 24 | 72 | 24 |
| Averaged number of signals | 1 | 2 | 4 | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | 0 and 800 | 800 | |
aT1WI: T1-weighted imaging high spatial resolution isotropic volume exam.
bT2WI: fat-suppressed turbo spin-echo T2-weighted imaging spectral attenuated inversion recovery.
cDWI: diffusion-weighted imaging.
dADC: apparent diffusion coefficient.
eN/A: not available.
Figure 2Research workflow of the paper. ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient; DD: differentiation degree; DWI: diffusion-weighted imaging; ECC: extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; GLCM: grey-level co-occurrence matrix; LMN: lymph node metastases; PSO-SVM: particle swarm optimization and support vector machine; RLM: grey-level run-length matrix; ROI: receiver operating characteristic curve; T1WI: T1-weighted imaging high spatial resolution isotropic volume exam; T2WI: fat-suppressed turbo spin-echo T2-weighted imaging spectral attenuated inversion recovery.
Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC; n=110).
| Characteristics | Differentiation degree of ECC | LNMa of ECC | |||||||||||
|
| High-risk group | Low-medium risk group | Non-LNM | LNM | |||||||||
| Age in years, mean (SD) | 56.4 (10.3) | 57.5 (9.8) | .957 | 58.0 (9.6) | 54.4 (10.6) | .272 | |||||||
|
| .434 | .969 | |||||||||||
|
| Male | 22(50) | 38(57.6) |
| 43(54.4) | 17(54.8) |
| ||||||
|
| Female | 22(50) | 28(42.4) |
| 36(45.6) | 14(45.2) |
| ||||||
|
| .876 |
| .174 | ||||||||||
|
| Porta | 20(45.5) | 29(43.9) |
| 32(40.5) | 17(54.8) |
| ||||||
|
| Distal bile duct | 24(54.5) | 37(56.1) |
| 47(59.5) | 14(45.2) |
| ||||||
| Lesion areab (mm2), mean (SD) | 115.144 (SD 78.425) | 131.8649 (SD 73.069) | .495 | 133.199 (SD 86.93) | 103.515 (SD 70.998) | .816 | |||||||
aLymph node metastases.
bLesion size was defined as the maximum diameter on transverse images.
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the intra-observer and inter-observer.
| Data | Intra-observer | Inter-observer | ||
| Patients, n | 30 | 30 | ||
| MRI sequence | T1WI, T2WI, DWI | T1WI, T2WI, DWI | ||
|
| ||||
|
| Mean | 0.9849 | 0.9749 | |
|
| Maximum | 0.9999 | 1 | |
|
| Minimum | 0.8256 | 0.8641 | |
|
| SD | 0.0278 | 0.0333 | |
Figure 3Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) of the performance evaluation for (a) differentiation degree prediction of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the training and testing cohorts and (b) lymphatic node metastasis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the training and testing cohorts. AUC: area under the curve.
The performance of the radiomics prediction model for predicting differentiation degree (DD) and lymph node metastases (LNM) of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) by using a particle swarm optimization and support vector machine (PSO-SVM) model.
| Evaluation indicators (%) | DD of ECC | LNM of ECC | ||
|
| Training group | Testing group | Training group | Testing group |
| Average AUCa | 89.1b | 84.6 | 90.4b | 88.9 |
| Average accuracy | 82.6 | 80.9 | 83.6 | 81.2 |
| Average sensitivityc | 80.5 | 78.1 | 85.8 | 83.2 |
| Average specificityd | 83.1 | 81.5 | 82.1 | 79.6 |
| Average PPVe | 77.2 | 75.6 | 79.1 | 76.9 |
| Average NPVf | 84.6 | 81.8 | 89.5 | 86.8 |
aAUC: area under the curve.
bP<.001.
cSensitivity is computed at average radiologist specificity.
dSpecificity is computed at average radiologist sensitivity.
ePPV: positive predictive value; positive predictive value is computed at average radiologist sensitivity.
fNPV: negative predictive value.