Literature DB >> 14746840

Fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.

Christopher D Anderson1, Michael H Rice, C Wright Pinson, William C Chapman, Ravi S Chari, Dominique Delbeke.   

Abstract

Our goal was to evaluate fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in staging patients with biliary tract cancers. Fifty consecutive patients who underwent FDG-PET for suspected cholangiocarcinoma (n=36) or gallbladder carcinoma (n=14) were reviewed. Patients with cholangiocarcinoma were divided into two groups: group 1 had nodular type (mass=1 cm) (n=22) and group 2 had infiltrating type (n=14) cholangiocarcinoma. Thirty-one of 36 patients evaluated for cholangiocarcinoma had cholangiocarcinoma and five did not. Sensitivity was 85% for nodular morphology but only 18% for infiltrating morphology. Sensitivity for metastases was 65% but false negative for carcinomatosis in three of three patients. One false positive result occurred in a patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis who had acute cholangitis. Seven (58%) of 12 patients had FDG uptake along the tract of a biliary stent. FDG-PET led to a change in surgical management in 30% (11 of 36) of patients evaluated for cholangiocarcinoma because of detection of unsuspected metastases. Eleven of 14 patients with gallbladder carcinoma were newly diagnosed by cholecystectomy or another type of exploratory procedure, whereas three patients were undergoing follow-up. Nine had residual gallbladder carcinoma at the time of PET. Sensitivity for gallbladder carcinoma was 78%. Sensitivity for extrahepatic metastases was 50% in eight patients; six of them had carcinomatosis. These data suggest that PET is accurate in predicting the presence of nodular cholangiocarcinoma (mass>1cm) but was not helpful for the infiltrating type. PET was also helpful for detecting residual gallbladder carcinoma following cholecystectomy, but was not helpful in patients with carcinomatosis. Although FDG-PET led to a change in management in 30% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma, it must be interpreted with caution in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and with stents in place, as well as in those with known granulomatous disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14746840     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  25 in total

1.  Glucose-6-phosphatase activity in normal, pre-cancerous, and neoplastic tissues.

Authors:  G WEBER; A CANTERO
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1955-02       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Positron emission tomography: a financial and operational analysis.

Authors:  P S Conti; J S Keppler; J M Halls
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Positron emission tomography and cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Authors:  A Widjaja; H Mix; S Wagner; K F Graz; J van den Hoff; T Petrich; P N Meier; M P Manns
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Detection of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  S Keiding; S B Hansen; H H Rasmussen; A Gee; A Kruse; K Roelsgaard; U Tage-Jensen; J F Dahlerup
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Positron emission tomography scanning in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  M A Khan; C S Combs; E M Brunt; V J Lowe; M K Wolverson; H Solomon; B T Collins; A M Di Bisceglie
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 25.083

6.  Possibility of Differential Diagnosis of Small Polypoid Lesions in the Gallbladder Using FDG-PET.

Authors:  T Koh; H Taniguchi; S Kunishima; H Yamagishi
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  2000-09

7.  Positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose for diagnosis and staging of bile duct cancer.

Authors:  R Kluge; F Schmidt; K Caca; H Barthel; S Hesse; P Georgi; A Seese; D Huster; F Berr
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Physicochemical properties and isoenzyme composition of hexokinase from normal and malignant human tissues.

Authors:  N K Monakhov; E L Neistadt; M M Shavlovskil; A L Shvartsman; S A Neĭfakh
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Evaluation of liver tumors using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET: characterization of tumor and assessment of effect of treatment.

Authors:  S Okazumi; K Isono; K Enomoto; T Kikuchi; M Ozaki; H Yamamoto; H Hayashi; T Asano; M Ryu
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  In vivo assessment of glucose metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with FDG-PET.

Authors:  T Torizuka; N Tamaki; T Inokuma; Y Magata; S Sasayama; Y Yonekura; A Tanaka; Y Yamaoka; K Yamamoto; J Konishi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  85 in total

1.  Successful diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma coexisting with adenomyomatosis by 18F-FDG-PET--report of a case.

Authors:  Keiichi Suzuki; Susumu Watada; Mitsui Yoko; Tadaki Nakahara; Yusuke Kumamoto
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2011-12

2.  Update of PET and PET/CT for hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies.

Authors:  Dominique Delbeke; William H Martin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging characteristics of unusual cystic metastasis on the liver surface arising from gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Sandip Basu; Ramesh Rao
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: a European and global perspective.

Authors:  Matthew David Hale; Keith J Roberts; James Hodson; Nigel Scott; Maria Sheridan; Giles J Toogood
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Cross-sectional Imaging of Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Update.

Authors:  Naveen Kalra; Pankaj Gupta; Manphool Singhal; Rajesh Gupta; Vikas Gupta; Radhika Srinivasan; Bhagwant R Mittal; Radha K Dhiman; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-30

Review 6.  Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009.

Authors:  Murad Aljiffry; Mark J Walsh; Michele Molinari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nataliya Razumilava; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis mimicking gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Ofor Ewelukwa; Omair Ali; Salma Akram
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-08

Review 9.  Imaging of liver cancer.

Authors:  Ben Ariff; Claire R Lloyd; Sameer Khan; Mohamed Shariff; Andrew V Thillainayagam; Devinder S Bansi; Shahid A Khan; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Adrian K P Lim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Staging of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Eun Chung; Myeong-Jin Kim; Young Nyun Park; Yoon-Hee Lee; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.