Literature DB >> 12243159

Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers.

Larry E Humes1.   

Abstract

This paper reports the aided and unaided speech-recognition scores from a group of 171 elderly hearing-aid wearers. All hearing-aid wearers were fit with identical instruments (linear Class-D amplifiers with output-limiting compression) and evaluated with a standard protocol. In addition to including multiple measures of speech recognition, an extensive set of physiological and perceptual measures of auditory function, as well as general measures of cognitive function, were completed prior to the hearing-aid fitting. Comparison of the results from this study to available norms suggested that this group of participants was fairly typical or representative for their hearing loss and age. Approaches to the prediction of general speech-recognition performance that were examined included methods based on an acoustical index, the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII), and others based on linear-regression statistical analysis. The latter approach proved to be the most successful, accounting for about two-thirds of the variance in speech-recognition performance, with the primary predictive factors being measures of hearing loss and cognitive function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12243159     DOI: 10.1121/1.1499132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  47 in total

1.  Modeling and predicting hearing aid outcome.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

2.  Auditory temporal-order processing of vowel sequences by young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Determination of the potential benefit of time-frequency gain manipulation.

Authors:  Michael C Anzalone; Lauren Calandruccio; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sheetal Desai; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Development and efficacy of a frequent-word auditory training protocol for older adults with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Matthew H Burk; Lauren E Strauser; Dana L Kinney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Integrating cognitive and peripheral factors in predicting hearing-aid processing effectiveness.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Individual differences in categorical perception of speech: Cue weighting and executive function.

Authors:  Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2016-09-23

9.  The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jennifer J Lister; Anthony T Cacace; Karen J Cruickshanks; George A Gates; Richard H Wilson; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.