Literature DB >> 33000376

The value of mammography in women with focal breast complaints in addition to initial targeted ultrasound.

L Appelman1, P T M Appelman2, C C N Siebers1, P Bult3, H L S Go4, M Schlooz5, R M Mann6,7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the added value of mammography in women with focal breast complaints and the utility of initial targeted ultrasound in this setting.
METHODS: Women with symptomatic breast disease who were evaluated by breast imaging (mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound) between January 2016 and December 2016 in the Radboud University Medical Centre were included. We retrospectively collected the following data: date of birth, indication of imaging, visibility on mammography/ultrasound, whether biopsy was taken, additional findings, BI-RADS-classification, pathology and follow-up results.
RESULTS: A total of 494 women were included (mean age 46.5, range 30 to 93). In 49 women (9.9%), symptomatic breast cancer was diagnosed, all visible during targeted ultrasound. The negative predictive value of targeted ultrasound was very high (99.8%). Additional findings on mammography were significantly more often malignant when the symptomatic lesion was also malignant (3.8% vs 70%, P < 0.05). In only one patient with symptoms caused by a benign finding, an incidental malignancy was detected on mammography outside the area of complaint (detection rate 2.2/1000 examinations).
CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of mammography for cancer detection in women with focal breast complaints is very low when targeted ultrasound is performed. Additional findings are most common in patients with symptomatic breast cancer. Our results suggest that initial targeted ultrasound is a more appropriate initial tool for the evaluation of focal breast complaints. Mammography could be performed on indication only.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Focal breast symptoms; Initial targeted ultrasound; Mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33000376      PMCID: PMC7867512          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05943-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  15 in total

1.  Psychological impact of benign breast biopsy: a longitudinal, comparative study.

Authors:  Michael A Andrykowski; Janet S Carpenter; Jamie L Studts; Matthew J Cordova; Lauren L C Cunningham; Abbie Beacham; David Sloan; Daniel Kenady; Patrick McGrath
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 2.  Investigation of suspected breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Britton; Ruchi Sinnatamby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-18

Review 3.  How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population?

Authors:  H A Moss; P D Britton; C D Flower; A H Freeman; D J Lomas; R M Warren
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  New Palpable Breast Lump With Recent Negative Mammogram: Is Repeat Mammography Necessary?

Authors:  Stephanie E Leung; Ilanit Ben-Nachum; Anat Kornecki
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors.

Authors:  P Skaane
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1999

6.  Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Les Irwig; Judy M Simpson; Merran McKessar; Steven Blome; Jennie Noakes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Accuracy and value of breast ultrasound for primary imaging evaluation of symptomatic women 30-39 years of age.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Christoph I Lee; Vilert A Loving; Michael S Portillo; Sue Peacock; Wendy B DeMartini
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Comparative accuracy of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms according to age and breast density.

Authors:  Emine Devolli-Disha; Suzana Manxhuka-Kërliu; Halit Ymeri; Arben Kutllovci
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.363

9.  Referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times after introduction of two week wait rule for breast cancer: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shelley Potter; Sasi Govindarajulu; Mike Shere; Fiona Braddon; Geoffrey Curran; Rosemary Greenwood; Ajay K Sahu; Simon J Cawthorn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-13

10.  Characterizing breast symptoms in family practice.

Authors:  Margaret M Eberl; Robert L Phillips; Henk Lamberts; Inge Okkes; Martin C Mahoney
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.