Literature DB >> 12646432

Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms.

Nehmat Houssami1, Les Irwig, Judy M Simpson, Merran McKessar, Steven Blome, Jennie Noakes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the age-specific sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in symptomatic women to determine the age below which sonography may be the more accurate imaging test, which may guide the choice of initial breast imaging examination based on the woman's age.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighty subjects were sampled from all women consecutively attending a symptomatic breast clinic between 1994 and 1996 and ranging in age from 25 to 55 years. We included all 240 women shown to have breast cancer (thus avoiding selection bias) and 240 age-matched women shown not to have cancer. Mammograms and sonograms were prospectively interpreted independently and without knowledge of age by two radiologists in a blinded manner, with a third radiologist arbitrating disagreements. Sensitivity and specificity of each imaging test in relation to age were examined using logistic regression modeling, and accuracy was compared using the chi-square test for paired proportions.
RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of each test were not linearly associated with age; however, the sensitivity of mammography increased substantially in women older than 50 years. Sonographic sensitivity of 81.7% was not significantly greater than mammographic sensitivity of 75.8% (chi(2)(1) = 2.06, p = 0.15). However, in women 45 years old or younger, the sensitivity of sonography was 13.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.1-24.3%) greater than that of mammography. The specificity of both tests was approximately 88.0%.
CONCLUSION: These data show that sonography is the more accurate imaging test in women 45 years old or younger who present with breast symptoms and may be an appropriate initial imaging examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12646432     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.4.1800935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  30 in total

1.  Design-related bias in estimates of accuracy when comparing imaging tests: examples from breast imaging research.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Stefano Ciatto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Computer-aided simple triage.

Authors:  Roman Goldenberg; Nathan Peled
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  The use of ultrasonography and digital mammography in women under 40 years with symptomatic breast cancer: a 7-year Irish experience.

Authors:  C E Redmond; G M Healy; C F Murphy; A O'Doherty; A Foster
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.

Authors:  Bonnie C Yankaskas; Sebastien Haneuse; Julie M Kapp; Karla Kerlikowske; Berta Geller; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Use of shear wave elastography to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Deniz Çebi Olgun; Bora Korkmazer; Fahrettin Kılıç; Atilla Süleyman Dikici; Mehmet Velidedeoğlu; Fatih Aydoğan; Fatih Kantarcı; Mehmet Halit Yılmaz
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 6.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Surgical mammography reporting in a limited resource environment.

Authors:  John P Mouton; Justus Apffelstaedt; Karin Baatjes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Andriy I Bandos; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Roberta A Jong; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Clinicopathological characteristics of mucinous carcinoma of the breast in Korea: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma-not otherwise specified.

Authors:  Seho Park; Jaseung Koo; Joo-Hee Kim; Woo Ick Yang; Byeong-Woo Park; Kyong Sik Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Potential for Raman spectroscopy to provide cancer screening using a peripheral blood sample.

Authors:  Andrew T Harris; Anxhela Lungari; Christopher J Needham; Stephen L Smith; Michael A Lones; Sheila E Fisher; Xuebin B Yang; Nicola Cooper; Jennifer Kirkham; D Alastair Smith; Dominic P Martin-Hirsch; Alec S High
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2009-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.