Literature DB >> 19001305

Characterizing breast symptoms in family practice.

Margaret M Eberl1, Robert L Phillips, Henk Lamberts, Inge Okkes, Martin C Mahoney.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The frequency and outcome of breast symptoms have not been well characterized in primary care settings. To enhance and inform physician practice, this study aims to establish the proportion of visits and resultant diagnoses by age by examining longitudinal data on breast-related reasons for encounter.
METHODS: We used data from a prospective longitudinal sample of patients seeking care in Dutch family physician offices between 1985 and 2003 to provide routine family practice data on breast symptoms as the reason for encounter; all visits were coded using the International Classification of Primary Care. Data on breast symptom prevalence are based upon 84,285 active female patients and 367,834 total encounters.
RESULTS: Overall breast symptoms were reported in about 3% of all visits by female patients (29.7 per 1,000 active female patients per year); breast pain and breast mass were the most common breast-related complaints. Breast symptom complaints were highest among women aged 25 to 44 years (48 of 1,000) and among women aged 65 years and older (33 per 1,000). Of the women complaining of breast symptoms, 81 (3.2%) had breast cancer diagnosed. Breast mass had a markedly elevated positive likelihood ratio for breast cancer (15.04; 95% confidence interval, 11.74-19.28).
CONCLUSIONS: As expected, of patients with breast symptoms only a small subset was subsequently given a diagnosis of breast cancer (3.2%); however, the presence of a breast mass was associated with an elevated likelihood of breast cancer. These data illustrate the use of systematic data collection and classification from primary care offices to extract information regarding disease symptoms and diagnoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001305      PMCID: PMC2582463          DOI: 10.1370/afm.905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  8 in total

1.  The March 2002 update of the electronic version of ICPC-2. A step forward to the use of ICD-10 as a nomenclature and a terminology for ICPC-2.

Authors:  I M Okkes; H W Becker; R M Bernstein; H Lamberts
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 2.  Diagnosing the cause of chest pain.

Authors:  William E Cayley
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  Consultations for breast disease in general practice and hospital referral patterns.

Authors:  M M Roberts; R A Elton; S E Robinson; K French
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Management of female breast disease by Southampton general practitioners.

Authors:  S Nichols; W E Waters; M J Wheeler
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-11-29

5.  The presentation and management of female breast symptoms in general practice in Sheffield.

Authors:  P Newton; D R Hannay; R Laver
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  A qualitative study of delay among women reporting symptoms of breast cancer.

Authors:  C Burgess; M S Hunter; A J Ramirez
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Breast cancer in 120 women under 35 years old. A 10-year community-wide survey.

Authors:  M H Max; T W Klamer
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Tiredness in Dutch family practice. Data on patients complaining of and/or diagnosed with "tiredness".

Authors:  E G H Kenter; I M Okkes; S K Oskam; H Lamberts
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.267

  8 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Benign Breast Disease in Women.

Authors:  Angrit Stachs; Johannes Stubert; Toralf Reimer; Steffi Hartmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Reported breast symptoms in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  A Blythe Ryerson; Jacqueline Miller; Christie R Eheman
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 3.  Positive predictive values of ≥5% in primary care for cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  Mark Shapley; Gemma Mansell; Joanne L Jordan; Kelvin P Jordan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Cancer diagnosis in primary care.

Authors:  William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  A Family Medicine Health Technology Strategy for Achieving the Triple Aim for US Health Care.

Authors:  Robert L Phillips; Andrew W Bazemore; Jennifer E DeVoe; Thomas J Weida; Alex H Krist; Michael F Dulin; Frances E Biagioli
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  The clinician's role in the diagnosis of breast disease.

Authors:  S Poma; A Longo
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2011-05-04

Review 7.  The role of primary care in early detection and follow-up of cancer.

Authors:  Jon D Emery; Katie Shaw; Briony Williams; Danielle Mazza; Julia Fallon-Ferguson; Megan Varlow; Lyndal J Trevena
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: a case-control study using electronic records.

Authors:  Sarah Walker; Chris Hyde; William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule to identify suspected breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rose Galvin; Doireann Joyce; Eithne Downey; Fiona Boland; Tom Fahey; Arnold K Hill
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer control interventions in Peru.

Authors:  Sten G Zelle; Tatiana Vidaurre; Julio E Abugattas; Javier E Manrique; Gustavo Sarria; José Jeronimo; Janice N Seinfeld; Jeremy A Lauer; Cecilia R Sepulveda; Diego Venegas; Rob Baltussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.