Literature DB >> 17631514

Referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times after introduction of two week wait rule for breast cancer: prospective cohort study.

Shelley Potter1, Sasi Govindarajulu, Mike Shere, Fiona Braddon, Geoffrey Curran, Rosemary Greenwood, Ajay K Sahu, Simon J Cawthorn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long term impact of the two week wait rule for breast cancer on referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: A specialist breast clinic in a teaching hospital in Bristol. PARTICIPANTS: All patients referred to breast clinic from primary care between 1999 and 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number, route, and outcome of referrals from primary care and waiting times for urgent and routine appointments.
RESULTS: The annual number of referrals increased by 9% over the seven years from 3499 in 1999 to 3821 in 2005. Routine referrals decreased by 24% (from 1748 to 1331), but two week wait referrals increased by 42% (from 1751 to 2490) during this time. The percentage of patients diagnosed with cancer in the two week wait group decreased from 12.8% (224/1751) in 1999 to 7.7% (191/2490) in 2005 (P<0.001), while the number of cancers detected in the "routine" group increased from 2.5% (43/1748) to 5.3% (70/1331) (P<0.001) over the same period. About 27% (70/261) of people with cancer are currently referred in the non-urgent group. Waiting times for routine referrals have increased with time.
CONCLUSION: The two week wait rule for breast cancer is failing patients. The number of cancers detected in the two week wait population is decreasing, and an unacceptable proportion is now being referred via the routine route. If breast cancer services are to be improved, the two week wait rule should be reviewed urgently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17631514      PMCID: PMC1941875          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39258.688553.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  12 in total

1.  Breast cancer: delays, dilemmas, and delusions.

Authors:  A S Coates
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-03       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Impact of the '2 week wait' directive for suspected cancer on service provision in a symptomatic breast clinic.

Authors:  P J Cant; D S Yu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Two week rule for cancer referrals. Specialists, not GPs, may be best qualified to assess urgency.

Authors:  P Sauven
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-13

4.  Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working?

Authors:  R Jones; G Rubin; P Hungin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-30

5.  Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 1995.

Authors:  F Bray; R Sankila; J Ferlay; D M Parkin
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  One stop breast clinics--victims of their own success? A prospective audit of referrals to a specialist breast clinic.

Authors:  R S Patel; D C Smith; I Reid
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Has the breast cancer 'two week wait' guarantee for assessment made any difference?

Authors:  A R Khawaja; S M Allan
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 8.  The 2-week wait for suspected cancer: time for a rethink?

Authors:  S J Hanna; A Muneer; K H Khalil
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Implementing the 2-week wait rule for cancer referral in the UK: general practitioners' views and practices.

Authors:  W Dodds; M Morgan; C Wolfe; K S Raju
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.520

10.  Impact of the '2 week wait' on referrals to breast units in the UK.

Authors:  P Sauven
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.380

View more
  42 in total

1.  Aiming to reduce late detection of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Hiten Joshi; David McPartlin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Diagnosis: Cancer diagnosis in UK primary care.

Authors:  William Hamilton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Two-week cancer referrals: what do you tell the patient?

Authors:  Relton Cummings; Maria Vincent
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

5.  Fast track referral for cancer.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa; Christobel Saunders
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-11

6.  Two week rule: Breast cancer growth rates favour abolition of rule.

Authors:  Emma J Helm; Edward Nash
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-25

7.  Two week rule: Breast cancer experience has wider implications.

Authors:  S Michael Crawford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-25

8.  [Paradoxes in referral from primary to specialist care].

Authors:  Juan Gérvas; Luis Miguel García Olmos; Juan Simó; Salvador Peiró
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.137

9.  Who should run breast clinics, surgeons or radiologists?

Authors:  Tom Dehn
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  The impact of the two-week wait rule on the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer in a single UK institution.

Authors:  Christopher Blick; David Bailey; Neil Haldar; Amarjit Bdesha; John Kelleher; Asif Muneer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.