| Literature DB >> 32986125 |
Eslam Bahgat1, Hanan El-Halaby2, Ashraf Abdelrahman3, Nehad Nasef4,5,6, Hesham Abdel-Hady1,2.
Abstract
Sonographic assessment of diaphragmatic thickness and excursion has been found to be an accurate tool in predicting successful extubation of adult patients from invasive mechanical ventilation. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of sonographic assessment of diaphragmatic thickness and excursion in predicting successful extubation of preterm infants from invasive conventional mechanical ventilation. Preterm infants less than 32 weeks gestation who required invasive conventional mechanical ventilation were evaluated by diaphragmatic sonography within 1 h of their planned extubation. Infants were classified into successful or failed extubation groups based on their ability to stay off invasive mechanical ventilation for 72 h after extubation. Inspiratory and expiratory thickness plus excursion of the right and left hemidiaphragm as well as diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF) measures were compared between groups. We included 43 eligible infants, of whom 34 infants succeeded and 9 infants failed extubation. Infants in the successful extubation group had a significantly higher expiratory thickness of the right and left hemidiaphragm, excursion of the right and left hemidiaphragm, inspiratory thickness of the left hemidiaphragm, and DTF of the left hemidiaphragm compared with infants who failed extubation. The receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that excursion of the right and left hemidiaphragm has the highest significant accuracy in predicting successful extubation of preterm infants among all diaphragmatic parameters (AUC is 0.98 and 0.96, respectively; p value < 0.001 for both).Entities:
Keywords: Diaphragm; Extubation predictor; Mechanical ventilation; Preterm infant; Ultrasound waves
Year: 2020 PMID: 32986125 PMCID: PMC7520377 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-020-03805-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Pediatr ISSN: 0340-6199 Impact factor: 3.183
Fig. 1Diagram showing the flow of participants in the study
Baseline characteristics of the studied groups
| Characteristics | Successful extubation group | Failed extubation group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (weeks) | 29.5 | 29.2 | 0.66 |
| Birth weight (g) | 1206 | 1111 | 0.28 |
| Male sex | 10 (29%) | 3 (33%) | 0.98 |
| Apgar score | |||
| • 1 min | 5 (3–6) | 4 (4–6) | 0.62 |
| • 5 min | 8 (6–9) | 8 (7–8) | 0.86 |
| Mode of delivery | |||
| • Vaginal delivery | 9 (26%) | 4 (44%) | 0.41 |
| • Cesarean section | 25 (74%) | 5 (56%) | |
| Small for gestational age | 3 (9%) | 1 (11%) | 0.98 |
| Antenatal steroid therapy | 30 (88%) | 8 (89%) | 0.98 |
| Surfactant therapy | 10 (29%) | 5 (56%) | 0.24 |
| Culture proven early-onset neonatal sepsis | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1.0 |
| Caffeine therapy | 33 (97%) | 9 (100%) | 0.98 |
| Postnatal age at extubation (days) | 13 (10.5–15.5) | 16 (14.5–17) | 0.02 |
| Body weight at extubation (g) | 1177 ± 245 | 1047 ± 146 | 0.1 |
| Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (days) | 6.5 (4–9) | 10 (7.5–11.5) | 0.04 |
| Pre-extubation mean airway pressure (cm H2O) | 6.3 ± 0.5 | 6.6 ± 0.3 | 0.03 |
| Pre-extubation fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) | 21.1 ± 0.6 | 23.6 ± 2.0 | <0.001 |
Data expressed as mean + SD, median (inter-quartile range), or number (percentage)
Sonographic diaphragmatic parameters of the studied groups
| Characteristics | Successful extubation group | Failed extubation group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inspiratory thickness of the right hemidiaphragm (mm) | 1.38 ± 0.10 | 1.32 ± 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Expiratory thickness of the right hemidiaphragm (mm) | 1.29 ± 0.13 | 1.19 ± 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Excursion of the right hemidiaphragm (mm) | 3.43 ± 0.41 | 2.37 ± 0.37 | < 0.001 |
| Inspiratory thickness of the left hemidiaphragm (mm) | 1.35 ± 0.14 | 1.23 ± 0.14 | 0.03 |
| Expiratory thickness of the left hemidiaphragm (mm) | 1.24 ± 0.10 | 1.16 ± 0.07 | 0.03 |
| Excursion of the left hemidiaphragm (mm) | 3.08 ± 0.36 | 2.0 ± 0.53 | < 0.001 |
| Diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) of the right hemidiaphragm (%) | 38.4 ± 9.4 | 32.1 ± 7.5 | 0.07 |
| Diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) of the left hemidiaphragm (%) | 35.4 ± 14.2 | 23.3 ± 15.1 | 0.03 |
Data expressed as mean + SD
Fig. 2Sonographic images showing M-mode measurements of inspiratory thickness, expiratory thickness, and excursion of the right hemidiaphragm in an infant (case number 5) from the successful extubation group and an infant (case number 11) from the failed extubation group
Correlation between duration of pre-extubation (invasive) mechanical ventilation and sonographic diaphragmatic parameters of the studied groups
| Characteristics | All infants | |
|---|---|---|
| Inspiratory thickness of the right hemidiaphragm (mm) | − 0.63 | < 0.001 |
| Expiratory thickness of the right hemidiaphragm (mm) | − 0.58 | < 0.001 |
| Excursion of the right hemidiaphragm (mm) | − 0.31 | 0.04 |
| Inspiratory thickness of the left hemidiaphragm (mm) | − 0.64 | < 0.001 |
| Expiratory thickness of the left hemidiaphragm (mm) | − 0.53 | < 0.001 |
| Excursion of the left hemidiaphragm (mm) | − 0.25 | 0.09 |
| Diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) of the right hemidiaphragm (%) | − 0.61 | < 0.001 |
| Diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) of the left hemidiaphragm (%) | − 0.64 | < 0.001 |
Fig. 3Receiver-operating characteristic curves show area under the curve (AUC) and p value of significance for inspiratory thickness of the right hemidiaphragm (a), expiratory thickness of the right hemidiaphragm (b), excursion of the right hemidiaphragm (c), inspiratory thickness of the left hemidiaphragm (d), expiratory thickness of the left hemidiaphragm (e), excursion of the left hemidiaphragm (f), and diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) of the right hemidiaphragm (g) and the left hemidiaphragm (h) in predicting successful extubation of preterm infants from mechanical ventilation
• • | |
• • |