Literature DB >> 14992363

Normal diaphragmatic motion and the effects of body composition: determination with M-mode sonography.

Fatih Kantarci1, Ismail Mihmanli, Mustafa Kemal Demirel, Kemal Harmanci, Canan Akman, Fatih Aydogan, Aydanur Mihmanli, Omer Uysal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quantitative measurement of diaphragmatic motion in healthy subjects and to investigate the effects of different variables such as body mass index and waist circumference on the diaphragmatic motion.
METHODS: The study included 164 healthy subjects. The subjects were grouped according to age, sex, body mass index, and waist circumference. Measurements of diaphragmatic motion were made by a 3.5-MHz sonographic unit in the M-mode of the system. The posterior diaphragm on both sides was identified, and measurements were performed during deep inspiration.
RESULTS: The mean diaphragmatic motion measurements +/- SD were 49.23 +/- 10.98 and 50.17 +/- 11.73 mm on right and left sides, respectively. Female subjects had statistically significantly (P < .05) decreased diaphragmatic motion (right, 46.93 +/- 10.37 mm; left, 47.57 +/- 10.36 mm) than male subjects. The mean diaphragmatic motion (right, 40.90 +/- 8.89 mm; left, 39.37 +/- 9.15 mm) was less in subjects who were underweight (P < .05) when compared with subjects who were of normal weight, overweight, and obese. Subjects who had a waist circumference of less than 70 cm showed a statistically significant decrease (P < .05) in diaphragmatic motion (right, 42.55 +/- 9.12 mm; left, 42.24 +/- 9.73 mm) when compared with subjects who had a waist circumference of 70 to 85, 85 to 100, and greater than 100 cm. Also, subjects younger than 30 years had statistically significantly (P < .05) decreased diaphragmatic motion (right, 44.57 +/- 10.57 mm; left, 44.44 +/- 11.37 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: Sex, body mass index, waist circumference, and age may affect the diaphragmatic motion to some extent. Healthy persons of younger age with a smaller body mass index and waist circumference may show a decreased amount of diaphragmatic motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14992363     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.2.255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  24 in total

1.  Respiratory-induced errors in tumor quantification and delineation in CT attenuation-corrected PET images: effects of tumor size, tumor location, and respiratory trace: a simulation study using the 4D XCAT phantom.

Authors:  Parham Geramifar; Mojtaba Shamsaie Zafarghandi; Pardis Ghafarian; Arman Rahmim; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  A New Method for Diaphragmatic Maximum Relaxation Rate Ultrasonographic Measurement in the Assessment of Patients With Diaphragmatic Dysfunction.

Authors:  Christos P Loizou; Dimitrios Matamis; Giorgos Minas; Theodoros Kyprianou; Christakis D Loizou; Eleni Soilemezi; Entela Kotco; Constantinos S Pattichis
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.316

3.  Impact of data-driven cardiac respiratory motion correction on the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects with free-breathing CZT SPECT.

Authors:  Doumit Daou; Rémy Sabbah; Carlos Coaguila; Hatem Boulahdour
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Doppler waveform of the hepatic veins in an obese population.

Authors:  Nevzat Karabulut; Selçuk Kazil; Baki Yagci; Nuran Sabir
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Effects of Weight Loss on Acoustic Parameters After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Lourdes Bernadete Rocha de Souza; Marquiony Marques Dos Santos; Leandro Araújo Pernambuco; Cynthia Meira de Almeida Godoy; Deysianne Meire da Silva Lima
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  An evaluation of diaphragmatic movements in hemiplegic patients.

Authors:  N Voyvoda; C Yücel; G Karatas; I Oguzülgen; S Oktar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Diaphragm Thickness and Contractility in Individuals with Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain.

Authors:  Alieh Zendehdel Jadehkenari; Hamid Reza Haghighatkhah; Javad Sarrafzadeh; Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani; Amir Massoud Arab; Maryam Ziaeifar
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2022-06-18

Review 8.  Neuromuscular ultrasound for evaluation of the diaphragm.

Authors:  Aarti Sarwal; Francis O Walker; Michael S Cartwright
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Diaphragmatic motion studied by M-mode ultrasonography in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema.

Authors:  Li He; Wanguang Zhang; Jiahong Zhang; Le Cao; Lan Gong; Jingping Ma; He Huang; Jinwu Zeng; Chuanbin Zhu; Jianhua Gong; Yongjian Xu; Zhenxiang Zhang; Jianping Zhao; Huilan Zhang
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 10.  Diaphragm and Phrenic Nerve Ultrasound in COVID-19 Patients and Beyond: Imaging Technique, Findings, and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Zaid Patel; Colin K Franz; Ankit Bharat; James M Walter; Lisa F Wolfe; Igor J Koralnik; Swati Deshmukh
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.