Literature DB >> 32982601

Evaluating the Effects of Cell Sorting on Gene Expression.

Andrew Box1, Monica DeLay2, Scott Tighe3, Sridar V Chittur4, Alan Bergeron5, Matthew Cochran6, Peter Lopez7, E Michael Meyer8, Alan Saluk9, Sherry Thornton10, Kathleen Brundage11.   

Abstract

Cell sorting is a commonly used technology to isolate highly purified cell populations for downstream applications. Because the sorted cells are destined for further analysis, i.e., gene expression assays or functional assays, ensuring that the sorting process itself has little effect on the cells is of utmost importance. Previous studies examining the effects of sorting on cellular function have primarily focused on a specific cell type or condition. One of the goals of the Flow Cytometry Research Group of the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities is to establish best practice guidelines for cell sorting conditions that minimize cell stress, perturbation, or injury to the sorted cell population. In this study, the effects of nozzle size, sample pressure, UV exposure, and instrument type were evaluated for their effects on gene expression and cell cycle using both established cell lines and primary cells across several flow cytometry shared facilities. Results indicate that nozzle size and pressure, as well as UV exposure and instrument type, have only minor effects on gene expression, which were diminished by subsequent culturing of the sorted cells. In this assessment, these data demonstrate that cell sorting itself, regardless of instrumentation used, has minimal effects on downstream cellular applications. © Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities.

Keywords:  RNA microarray; flow cytometry; immune cells

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32982601      PMCID: PMC7497499          DOI: 10.7171/jbt.20-3103-004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  14 in total

1.  Computer simulations of the energy dissipation rate in a fluorescence-activated cell sorter: Implications to cells.

Authors:  Mike Mollet; Ruben Godoy-Silva; Claudia Berdugo; Jeffrey J Chalmers
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  A review of the effects of shear and interfacial phenomena on cell viability.

Authors:  J Hua; L E Erickson; T Y Yiin; L A Glasgow
Journal:  Crit Rev Biotechnol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 8.429

3.  Does FACS perturb gene expression?

Authors:  Graham M Richardson; Joanne Lannigan; Ian G Macara
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  The effect of cell subset isolation method on gene expression in leukocytes.

Authors:  Nadejda Beliakova-Bethell; Marta Massanella; Cory White; Steven Lada; Pinyi Du; Florin Vaida; Julià Blanco; Celsa A Spina; Christopher H Woelk
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.355

5.  Evaluation of EBV transformation of human memory B-cells isolated by FACS and MACS techniques.

Authors:  Sanam Sadreddini; Farhad Jadidi-Niaragh; Vahid Younesi; Tala Pourlak; Amir Afkham; Fazel Shokri; Mehdi Yousefi
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  An Evaluation of T-Cell Functionality After Flow Cytometry Sorting Revealed p38 MAPK Activation.

Authors:  Immanuel Andrä; Hanna Ulrich; Susi Dürr; Dominik Soll; Lynette Henkel; Corinne Angerpointner; Julia Ritter; Sabine Przibilla; Herbert Stadler; Manuel Effenberger; Dirk H Busch; Matthias Schiemann
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 7.  Ultraviolet radiation-mediated damage to cellular DNA.

Authors:  Jean Cadet; Evelyne Sage; Thierry Douki
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts.

Authors:  J A Thomson; J Itskovitz-Eldor; S S Shapiro; M A Waknitz; J J Swiergiel; V S Marshall; J M Jones
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Molecular mechanisms of ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage and repair.

Authors:  Rajesh P Rastogi; Ashok Kumar; Madhu B Tyagi; Rajeshwar P Sinha
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2010-12-16

10.  Sorting cells alters their redox state and cellular metabolome.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Llufrio; Lingjue Wang; Fuad J Naser; Gary J Patti
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 11.799

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cell Sorter Cleaning Practices and Their Impact on Instrument Sterility.

Authors:  Andrew Box; Laura Holmes; Monica DeLay; Dave Adams; Alan Bergeron; Karen Clise-Dwyer; Matt Cochran; Roxana Del Rio Guerra; E Michael Meyer; Kathleen M Brundage
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2022-02-02

2.  High efficiency sorting and outgrowth for single-cell cloning of mammalian cell lines.

Authors:  Adonary Munoz; José M Morachis
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.716

3.  Unraveling patterns of disrupted gene expression across a complex tissue.

Authors:  Kelsie E Hunnicutt; Jeffrey M Good; Erica L Larson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  INTACT vs. FANS for Cell-Type-Specific Nuclei Sorting: A Comprehensive Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison.

Authors:  Monika Chanu Chongtham; Tamer Butto; Kanak Mungikar; Susanne Gerber; Jennifer Winter
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Inside the Joint of Inflammatory Arthritis Patients: Handling and Processing of Synovial Tissue Biopsies for High Throughput Analysis.

Authors:  Achilleas Floudas; Aine Gorman; Nuno Neto; Michael G Monaghan; Zoe Elliott; Ursula Fearon; Viviana Marzaioli
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-14

6.  Sheath fluid impacts the depletion of cellular metabolites in cells afflicted by sorting induced cellular stress (SICS).

Authors:  Kamilah Ryan; Rebecca E Rose; Drew R Jones; Peter A Lopez
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.714

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.