Literature DB >> 34069481

INTACT vs. FANS for Cell-Type-Specific Nuclei Sorting: A Comprehensive Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison.

Monika Chanu Chongtham1, Tamer Butto2, Kanak Mungikar2, Susanne Gerber2, Jennifer Winter1,2.   

Abstract

Increasing numbers of studies seek to characterize the different cellular sub-populations present in mammalian tissues. The techniques "Isolation of Nuclei Tagged in Specific Cell Types" (INTACT) or "Fluorescence-Activated Nuclei Sorting" (FANS) are frequently used for isolating nuclei of specific cellular subtypes. These nuclei are then used for molecular characterization of the cellular sub-populations. Despite the increasing popularity of both techniques, little is known about their isolation efficiency, advantages, and disadvantages or downstream molecular effects. In our study, we compared the physical and molecular attributes of sfGFP+ nuclei isolated by the two methods-INTACT and FANS-from the neocortices of Arc-CreERT2 × CAG-Sun1/sfGFP animals. We identified differences in efficiency of sfGFP+ nuclei isolation, nuclear size as well as transcriptional (RNA-seq) and chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq) states. Therefore, our study presents a comprehensive comparison between the two widely used nuclei sorting techniques, identifying the advantages and disadvantages for both INTACT and FANS. Our conclusions are summarized in a table to guide researchers in selecting the most suitable methodology for their individual experimental design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATAC-Seq; FANS; INTACT; RNA-Seq; neuronal nuclei; nuclei sorting

Year:  2021        PMID: 34069481      PMCID: PMC8159132          DOI: 10.3390/ijms22105335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


  65 in total

1.  Molecular adaptations underlying susceptibility and resistance to social defeat in brain reward regions.

Authors:  Vaishnav Krishnan; Ming-Hu Han; Danielle L Graham; Olivier Berton; William Renthal; Scott J Russo; Quincey Laplant; Ami Graham; Michael Lutter; Diane C Lagace; Subroto Ghose; Robin Reister; Paul Tannous; Thomas A Green; Rachael L Neve; Sumana Chakravarty; Arvind Kumar; Amelia J Eisch; David W Self; Francis S Lee; Carol A Tamminga; Donald C Cooper; Howard K Gershenfeld; Eric J Nestler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner.

Authors:  Alexander Dobin; Carrie A Davis; Felix Schlesinger; Jorg Drenkow; Chris Zaleski; Sonali Jha; Philippe Batut; Mark Chaisson; Thomas R Gingeras
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Evaluating the Effects of Cell Sorting on Gene Expression.

Authors:  Andrew Box; Monica DeLay; Scott Tighe; Sridar V Chittur; Alan Bergeron; Matthew Cochran; Peter Lopez; E Michael Meyer; Alan Saluk; Sherry Thornton; Kathleen Brundage
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-09

4.  Immediate and deferred epigenomic signatures of in vivo neuronal activation in mouse hippocampus.

Authors:  Jordi Fernandez-Albert; Michal Lipinski; María T Lopez-Cascales; M Jordan Rowley; Ana M Martin-Gonzalez; Beatriz Del Blanco; Victor G Corces; Angel Barco
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  A simple method for gene expression and chromatin profiling of individual cell types within a tissue.

Authors:  Roger B Deal; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Decoding a signature-based model of transcription cofactor recruitment dictated by cardinal cis-regulatory elements in proximal promoter regions.

Authors:  Christopher Benner; Sergiy Konovalov; Carlos Mackintosh; Kasey R Hutt; Rieka Stunnenberg; Ivan Garcia-Bassets
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Osmotic modulation of chromatin impacts on efficiency and kinetics of cell fate modulation.

Authors:  A F Lima; G May; J Díaz-Colunga; S Pedreiro; A Paiva; L Ferreira; T Enver; F J Iborra; R Pires das Neves
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A scalable platform for the development of cell-type-specific viral drivers.

Authors:  Sinisa Hrvatin; Christopher P Tzeng; M Aurel Nagy; Hume Stroud; Charalampia Koutsioumpa; Oren F Wilcox; Elena G Assad; Jonathan Green; Christopher D Harvey; Eric C Griffith; Michael E Greenberg
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Applying univariate vs. multivariate statistics to investigate therapeutic efficacy in (pre)clinical trials: A Monte Carlo simulation study on the example of a controlled preclinical neurotrauma trial.

Authors:  Hristo Todorov; Emily Searle-White; Susanne Gerber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Widening spinal injury research to consider all supraspinal cell types: Why we must and how we can.

Authors:  Murray Blackmore; Elizabeth Batsel; Pantelis Tsoulfas
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Resilience and the Gut Microbiome: Insights from Chronically Socially Stressed Wild-Type Mice.

Authors:  Malena Dos Santos Guilherme; Francesco Valeri; Jennifer Winter; Marianne B Müller; Andreas Schwiertz; Kristina Endres
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.