Literature DB >> 31944553

An Evaluation of T-Cell Functionality After Flow Cytometry Sorting Revealed p38 MAPK Activation.

Immanuel Andrä1, Hanna Ulrich2, Susi Dürr1, Dominik Soll1, Lynette Henkel1, Corinne Angerpointner1, Julia Ritter2, Sabine Przibilla3, Herbert Stadler4,5, Manuel Effenberger1, Dirk H Busch1,6,7, Matthias Schiemann1.   

Abstract

Cell alterations during isolation and preparation for flow cytometry cell sorting by antibodies, temperature, homogenization, buffer composition and mitogens are well known. In contrast, little is known about cell alteration caused by the instrument or the sorting process itself. We systematically evaluated cellular responses to different sorter-induced physical forces. In summary, flow cytometry cell-sorting induced forces can affect cellular signaling cascades, especially the MAPK p38. Functional assays, related to the p38 MAPK pathway, of human primary T cells after flow cytometry sorting did lead to minor physiological modulation but no functional impairments.
© 2020 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. © 2020 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MAPK; T cells; cell purification; cell sorting; cell stress; flow cytometry cell sorting; p38 activation; traceless affinity cell selection

Year:  2020        PMID: 31944553     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  8 in total

1.  Evaluating the Effects of Cell Sorting on Gene Expression.

Authors:  Andrew Box; Monica DeLay; Scott Tighe; Sridar V Chittur; Alan Bergeron; Matthew Cochran; Peter Lopez; E Michael Meyer; Alan Saluk; Sherry Thornton; Kathleen Brundage
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-09

2.  Evaluating the Effects of Cell Sorting on Gene Expression.

Authors:  Andrew Box; Monica DeLay; Scott Tighe; Sridar V Chittur; Alan Bergeron; Matthew Cochran; Peter Lopez; E Michael Meyer; Alan Saluk; Sherry Thornton; Kathleen Brundage
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-06-22

3.  Cell Sorter Cleaning Practices and Their Impact on Instrument Sterility.

Authors:  Andrew Box; Laura Holmes; Monica DeLay; Dave Adams; Alan Bergeron; Karen Clise-Dwyer; Matt Cochran; Roxana Del Rio Guerra; E Michael Meyer; Kathleen M Brundage
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  Microfluidic cell sorter sample preparation for genomic assays.

Authors:  Nicole Jagnandan; Jose Morachis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.258

5.  INTACT vs. FANS for Cell-Type-Specific Nuclei Sorting: A Comprehensive Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison.

Authors:  Monika Chanu Chongtham; Tamer Butto; Kanak Mungikar; Susanne Gerber; Jennifer Winter
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Soluble and Microparticle-Based Delivery of TLR4 and TLR9 Agonists Differentially Modulate 3D Chemotaxis of Bone Marrow-Derived Dendritic Cells.

Authors:  Alexandra Atalis; J Brandon Dixon; Krishnendu Roy
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.092

7.  I-KCKT allows dissection-free RNA profiling of adult Drosophila intestinal progenitor cells.

Authors:  Kasun Buddika; Jingjing Xu; Ishara S Ariyapala; Nicholas S Sokol
Journal:  Development       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 6.862

8.  Sheath fluid impacts the depletion of cellular metabolites in cells afflicted by sorting induced cellular stress (SICS).

Authors:  Kamilah Ryan; Rebecca E Rose; Drew R Jones; Peter A Lopez
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.714

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.