Literature DB >> 34882778

Unraveling patterns of disrupted gene expression across a complex tissue.

Kelsie E Hunnicutt1, Jeffrey M Good2, Erica L Larson1.   

Abstract

Whole tissue RNASeq is the standard approach for studying gene expression divergence in evolutionary biology and provides a snapshot of the comprehensive transcriptome for a given tissue. However, whole tissues consist of diverse cell types differing in expression profiles, and the cellular composition of these tissues can evolve across species. Here, we investigate the effects of different cellular composition on whole tissue expression profiles. We compared gene expression from whole testes and enriched spermatogenesis populations in two species of house mice, Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus, and their sterile and fertile F1 hybrids, which differ in both cellular composition and regulatory dynamics. We found that cellular composition differences skewed expression profiles and differential gene expression in whole testes samples. Importantly, both approaches were able to detect large-scale patterns such as disrupted X chromosome expression, although whole testes sampling resulted in decreased power to detect differentially expressed genes. We encourage researchers to account for histology in RNASeq and consider methods that reduce sample complexity whenever feasible. Ultimately, we show that differences in cellular composition between tissues can modify expression profiles, potentially altering inferred gene ontological processes, insights into gene network evolution, and processes governing gene expression evolution.
© 2021 The Authors. Evolution © 2021 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluorescence-activated cell sorting; RNASeq; gene expression evolution; hybrid sterility; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34882778      PMCID: PMC9355168          DOI: 10.1111/evo.14420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   4.171


  114 in total

1.  A multitude of genes expressed solely in meiotic or postmeiotic spermatogenic cells offers a myriad of contraceptive targets.

Authors:  Nikolaus Schultz; F Kent Hamra; David L Garbers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The murine testicular transcriptome: characterizing gene expression in the testis during the progression of spermatogenesis.

Authors:  James E Shima; Derek J McLean; John R McCarrey; Michael D Griswold
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Rates of protein evolution are positively correlated with developmental timing of expression during mouse spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Good; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Strategic adjustments in sperm production within and between two island populations of house mice.

Authors:  Renée C Firman; Ines Klemme; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Dmrt1, a gene related to worm and fly sexual regulators, is required for mammalian testis differentiation.

Authors:  C S Raymond; M W Murphy; M G O'Sullivan; V J Bardwell; D Zarkower
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Transcriptomics of colour patterning and coloration shifts in crows.

Authors:  J W Poelstra; N Vijay; M P Hoeppner; J B W Wolf
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Functionality of intergenic transcription: an evolutionary comparison.

Authors:  Philipp Khaitovich; Janet Kelso; Henriette Franz; Johann Visagie; Thomas Giger; Sabrina Joerchel; Ekkehard Petzold; Richard E Green; Michael Lachmann; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Determining cell type abundance and expression from bulk tissues with digital cytometry.

Authors:  Aaron M Newman; Chloé B Steen; Chih Long Liu; Andrew J Gentles; Aadel A Chaudhuri; Florian Scherer; Michael S Khodadoust; Mohammad S Esfahani; Bogdan A Luca; David Steiner; Maximilian Diehn; Ash A Alizadeh
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 9.  Transcriptomics of Meiosis in the Male Mouse.

Authors:  Adriana Geisinger; Rosana Rodríguez-Casuriaga; Ricardo Benavente
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-03-05

10.  Chromosome Synapsis and Recombination in Male-Sterile and Female-Fertile Interspecies Hybrids of the Dwarf Hamsters (Phodopus, Cricetidae).

Authors:  Tatiana I Bikchurina; Katerina V Tishakova; Elena A Kizilova; Svetlana A Romanenko; Natalya A Serdyukova; Anna A Torgasheva; Pavel M Borodin
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.096

View more
  3 in total

1.  Stage-specific disruption of X chromosome expression during spermatogenesis in sterile house mouse hybrids.

Authors:  Erica L Larson; Emily E K Kopania; Kelsie E Hunnicutt; Dan Vanderpool; Sara Keeble; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.542

2.  Molecular Evolution across Mouse Spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Emily E K Kopania; Erica L Larson; Colin Callahan; Sara Keeble; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Extensive transgressive gene expression in testis but not ovary in the homoploid hybrid Italian sparrow.

Authors:  Homa Papoli Yazdi; Mark Ravinet; Melissah Rowe; Glenn-Peter Saetre; Caroline Ø Guldvog; Fabrice Eroukhmanoff; Alfonso Marzal; Sergio Magallanes; Anna Runemark
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.622

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.